ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Poop Did anyone get the new SI swimsuit edition? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=339111)

Titty Meat 07-19-2021 03:38 PM

Did anyone get the new SI swimsuit edition?
 
Who's that hottie on the cover Wow.

Hammock Parties 07-19-2021 03:53 PM

1985 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1yKy6gUMwL.jpg

1990 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN

https://vault.si.com/.image/t_share/...over-image.jpg

1995 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN

https://swimsuit.si.com/.image/t_sha...97finaljpg.jpg

2000 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN

https://images.wolfgangsvault.com/m/...zine-2000.webp

2005 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN

https://pisces.bbystatic.com/image2/...6991749_so.jpg

2010 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN

https://swimsuit.si.com/.image/t_sha...lder-title.png

2015 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN

https://swimsuit.si.com/.image/t_sha...swim-2015.webp

2016 FAT ACCEPTANCE

https://swimsuit.si.com/.image/t_sha...0-widthjpg.jpg

2018 BLM

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1MdsAAF9cL.jpg

2021 TRANS RIGHTS

https://media1.popsugar-assets.com/f...-interview.jpg

Hammock Parties 07-19-2021 03:56 PM

2022??????

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...Fg_400x400.jpg

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today, on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/JUNETEENTH2020?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#JUNETEENTH2020</a> a Fat Black Trans Woman Looks over NEW YORK !!! �������� <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BlackTransLivesMatter?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BlackTransLivesMatter</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BlackLivesMatter?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BlackLivesMatter</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ProudinMyCalvins?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ProudinMyCalvins</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/CalvinKlein?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CalvinKlein</a> <a href="https://t.co/Kvth3oCXw4">pic.twitter.com/Kvth3oCXw4</a></p>&mdash; Jari Jones (@IAmJariJones) <a href="https://twitter.com/IAmJariJones/status/1274028930626924546?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

KCUnited 07-19-2021 03:58 PM

Troy Polamalu is rocking that one piece though

Hammock Parties 07-19-2021 04:02 PM

2030??????????????

https://memegenerator.net/img/images...y-tranny-2.jpg

Kman34 07-19-2021 04:05 PM

Magazines are dying… This one is almost dead..

Rain Man 07-19-2021 04:11 PM

The swimsuit edition is such an oddity. It would be like Readers Digest or The Economist devoting one issue a year to women in bikinis. It has nothing to do with the magazine's core topic at all.

It also looks like they were on the precipice of outright porn in the 2015 cover before they walked it back.

I'm not complaining at all, and I understand that scantily clad women sell magazines (or at least they did before the internet), but it's just odd.

FloridaMan88 07-19-2021 04:18 PM

So Naomi Osaka is over her "social anxiety" that forced her to quit at Wimbledon?

https://imagesvc.meredithcorp.io/v3/...aomi-osaka.jpg

Hammock Parties 07-19-2021 04:21 PM

This stopped being relevant when I could find 50 hotter pics on my instagram five years ago.

Why the **** would you put anything but society's highest standard of beauty on the cover of your magazine for this?

What did you think the largest demographic subscribing to your magazine WAS?

Hint: they don't want to look at Mr. Bloom.

BWillie 07-19-2021 04:24 PM

WHAT IN THE ****

I came in here to make a joke that sooner or later they will put a trans on the cover.....in no way expecting that to actually be the case.

Sorce 07-19-2021 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15746787)
So Naomi Osaka is over her "social anxiety" that forced her to quit at Wimbledon?



https://imagesvc.meredithcorp.io/v3/...aomi-osaka.jpg

So a table, OK...

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

dlphg9 07-19-2021 04:46 PM

How brave lmao

No one wants to see a transgender person on the cover or any pages of the swimsuit edition.

eDave 07-19-2021 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15746787)
So Naomi Osaka is over her "social anxiety" that forced her to quit at Wimbledon?

You don't seem to understand even the basics what social anxiety is. Start with the word social.

lewdog 07-19-2021 05:01 PM

That trans is still out of Billay’s league.

Hammock Parties 07-19-2021 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 15746849)
That trans is still out of Billay’s league.

Not if he tucks.

FloridaMan88 07-19-2021 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15746839)
You don't seem to understand even the basics what social anxiety is. Start with the word social.

You don't seem to understand even the basics of what a fraud is... which is Naomi Osaka.

She claimed to have "social anxiety" and couldn't participate in the required media obligations at the French Open... which is why she quit mid-tournament. And then she refused to even participate in Wimbledon over this same "social anxiety" with regards to media obligations.

Yet apparently this same media "social anxiety" didn't impact her ability to pose for the SI Swimsuit Issue and the cover of TIME Magazine during the same time-frame.

srvy 07-19-2021 05:05 PM

Not swimsuit but Playmate of the Year Patty McGuire St Lou Mo girl. One of my Favorite bunnies.
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/olcAA...IIP/s-l400.jpg
https://64.media.tumblr.com/5d936646...915933d69b.jpg

BWillie 07-19-2021 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15746839)
You don't seem to understand even the basics what social anxiety is. Start with the word social.

I have or had social anxiety at least when I was a teen. I couldn't imagine a more terrifying experience than posing in front of a bunch of people I don't know.

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2021 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15746855)
You don't seem to understand even the basics of what a fraud is... which is Naomi Osaka.

She claimed to have "social anxiety" and couldn't participate in the required media obligations at the French Open... which is why she quit mid-tournament. And then she refused to even participate in Wimbledon over this same "social anxiety" with regards to media obligations.

Yet apparently this same media "social anxiety" didn't impact her ability to pose for the SI Swimsuit Issue and the cover of TIME Magazine during the same time-frame.

These photos were taken earlier this year and I'd imagine there were only a handful people present, not 14,000, while being broadcast to millions and millions.

Furthermore, the only person who's been "hurt" by her withdrawing from Wimbledon and other tournaments is her bank account.

Graystoke 07-19-2021 05:12 PM

Pepperidge Farm remembers

RealSNR 07-19-2021 05:16 PM

Billay was really hoping for Orlando Bloom on the cover, but Leyna Bloom is an okay Plan B.

Titty Meat 07-19-2021 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 15746878)
Billay was really hoping for Orlando Bloom on the cover, but Leyna Bloom is an okay Plan B.

I dont know who Orlando Bloom is RIP old person I've never heard of before

RealSNR 07-19-2021 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 15746888)
I dont know who Orlando Bloom is RIP old person I've never heard of before

My bad I thought you were into elves and shit like that

eDave 07-19-2021 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 15746888)
I dont know who Orlando Bloom is RIP old person I've never heard of before

https://i.imgur.com/bCC0VPM.jpg

Hammock Parties 07-19-2021 05:53 PM

Orlando Bloom ****ing died?

eDave 07-19-2021 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15746926)
Orlando Bloom ****ing died?

Yes. The day after tomorrow.

Hammock Parties 07-19-2021 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15746927)
Yes. The day after tomorrow.

****.

Spott 07-19-2021 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15746930)
****.

He can only come back every 10 years.

Bowser 07-19-2021 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15746927)
Yes. The day after tomorrow.

Rescuing Hobbits being taken to Isengard is dangerous business.

mr. tegu 07-19-2021 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15746855)
You don't seem to understand even the basics of what a fraud is... which is Naomi Osaka.

She claimed to have "social anxiety" and couldn't participate in the required media obligations at the French Open... which is why she quit mid-tournament. And then she refused to even participate in Wimbledon over this same "social anxiety" with regards to media obligations.

Yet apparently this same media "social anxiety" didn't impact her ability to pose for the SI Swimsuit Issue and the cover of TIME Magazine during the same time-frame.


Did you bet on her or something? What a weird thing to be mad about. And I know nothing of her story but social anxiety doesn’t simply mean you can’t do anything with or around others. There are plenty of reasons why she might feel the need to withdraw from the tournament while also being able to take photos.

KChiefs1 07-19-2021 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 15746856)
Not swimsuit but Playmate of the Year Patty McGuire St Lou Mo girl. One of my Favorite bunnies.
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/olcAA...IIP/s-l400.jpg
https://64.media.tumblr.com/5d936646...915933d69b.jpg


Jimmy Connors really liked her too.

smithandrew051 07-19-2021 07:52 PM

Elle MacPherson and Brooke Burke will always be my favorites.

stevieray 07-19-2021 07:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
ooh la la

srvy 07-19-2021 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 15747061)
Jimmy Connors really liked her too.

Yep and still married too.

Also about to turn 70.

FloridaMan88 07-19-2021 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15746869)
Furthermore, the only person who's been "hurt" by her withdrawing from Wimbledon and other tournaments is her bank account.

Wimbledon and the French Open were certainly “hurt” by not having arguably the most marketable player… men’s or women’s play in their respective tournaments.

The TV broadcasters and their advertisers were “hurt” by her quitting.

The shareholders and anyone with a business interest in her endorsement companies were “hurt” by her not playing in two of the most high profile tournaments in the sport.

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2021 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15747106)
Wimbledon and the French Open were certainly “hurt” by not having arguably the most marketable player… men’s or women’s play in their respective tournaments.

The TV broadcasters and their advertisers were “hurt” by her quitting.

The shareholders and anyone with a business interest in her endorsement companies were “hurt” by her not playing in two of the most high profile tournaments in the sport.

This is completely false.

Those broadcast deals were made years in advance of her even hitting the scene.

Players bow out to injury all of the time and the ratings don't take a nosedive because of it.

FloridaMan88 07-19-2021 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15747140)
This is completely false.

Those broadcast deals were made years in advance of her even hitting the scene.

Players bow out to injury all of the time and the ratings don't take a nosedive because of it.

The TV ratings would not have been higher if Osaka was in the final rounds of either tournament? Seriously?

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2021 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15747175)
The TV ratings would not have been higher if Osaka was in the final rounds of either tournament? Seriously?

People that watch tennis watch tennis, regardless of who's in the finals.

Do you watch the Chiefs if Tyreek Hill is injured? What if Patrick Mahomes is injured? Do you still watch the games?

Of course you do, just like tennis lovers watch Wimbledon and all of the majors.

Osaka has social anxiety, so it was the right move for her personally to sit out until she's well because she certainly doesn't want to end up like Jennifer Capriati.

Remember her?

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2021 10:28 PM

Wimbledon draws miniscule ratings, anyway. They used to average about 2 million last decade but they've been up and down in the past decade, although they're not too far off from their numbers from the 2000's.

These are US numbers only.

https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/202...all-star-game/

Wimbledon ratings down from 2019, up from 2018.

Last Sunday’s Novak Djokovic-Matteo Berrettini Wimbledon men’s final averaged 1.76 million viewers on ESPN, down 54% from the previous men’s final in 2019, Djokovic’s five-set marathon win over Roger Federer (3.83M), but up 8% from Djokovic-Kevin Anderson in 2018 (1.64M).

The full telecast window averaged 1.5 million, down 57% from 2019 but up 37% from 2018.

The previous day’s Ashleigh Barty-Karolína Plíšková women’s final averaged just 1.09 million — down 55% from Simona Halep-Serena Williams in 2019 (2.44M) and the smallest audience for any Wimbledon singles final since ESPN began airing the event exclusively in 2011. The previous low was 1.33 million for Petra Kvitova-Eugenie Bouchard in 2014.

The full telecast averaged 729,000 (-40%).

Fish 07-19-2021 10:36 PM

Back in high school, mid 90s. No internet. But our high school library got regular magazine subscriptions. So, I would read the Sports Illustrated during study hall, taking turns with tons of other guys. We had a stereotypical librarian woman in her late 40s, the type of woman who probably hadn't seen a penis in her life. When the yearly swimsuit edition came out, she would cut out all the bikini pics, but leave the stories. LOL. **** you, Linda.....

BigRedChief 07-19-2021 10:43 PM

I’m waiting for the on/off ranking list.

Rain Man 07-19-2021 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15746743)
1985 BEAUTIFUL SLIM WHITE WOMAN


Can you get all of the covers? We should have a tournament to pick the best swimsuit edition cover.

wazu 07-19-2021 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15746778)
The swimsuit edition is such an oddity. It would be like Readers Digest or The Economist devoting one issue a year to women in bikinis. It has nothing to do with the magazine's core topic at all.

It also looks like they were on the precipice of outright porn in the 2015 cover before they walked it back.

I'm not complaining at all, and I understand that scantily clad women sell magazines (or at least they did before the internet), but it's just odd.

Back in the 80s it was a shameless way to sell Sports Illustrated subscriptions. Men generally had an interest in the magazine to begin with. There was no internet, though, so if they wanted a bunch of sexy girlie pics they had to buy them in a setting where that was explicitly the only reason they were making the purchase.

Enter Sports Illustrated. You're buying the great sports journalism. You can't help it they also throw in one issue full of gorgeous women posing in bikinis. You are completely innocent of being a perv, and your wife/girlfriend/mom cannot complain or judge you because liking sports is totally acceptable and getting the swimsuit issue is just a byproduct of that completely innocent fact.

jjjayb 07-19-2021 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15746778)
The swimsuit edition is such an oddity. It would be like Readers Digest or The Economist devoting one issue a year to women in bikinis. It has nothing to do with the magazine's core topic at all.

It also looks like they were on the precipice of outright porn in the 2015 cover before they walked it back.

I'm not complaining at all, and I understand that scantily clad women sell magazines (or at least they did before the internet), but it's just odd.

It used to be a magazine geared towards men. Men liked boobs. They showed boobs. They sold lots of magazines.

Apparently these days they're geared towards a different market. One that doesn't seem to buy their magazines anyway. :shrug:

007 07-19-2021 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15747210)
Can you get all of the covers? We should have a tournament to pick the best swimsuit edition cover.


Kathy Ireland

Rain Man 07-19-2021 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 007 (Post 15747225)
Kathy Ireland

I might have to go Tyra Banks on this one.

007 07-19-2021 11:23 PM

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....10y7JBXKUL.jpg

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1f1xMBJ2CL.jpg

https://www.si.com/.image/t_share/MT...land_01jpg.jpg

listopencil 07-20-2021 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 15746931)
He can only come back every 10 years.

Orlando Brigadoon?

Coochie liquor 07-20-2021 08:10 AM

Megan the Stallion is the best of the 2 that count. And by a mile!

Hammock Parties 07-20-2021 09:00 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Since Victoria’s Secret turned woke, it has had to close hundreds of stores, and lost $275.2 Million this last quarter.</p>&mdash; ����ProudArmyBrat (@leslibless) <a href="https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1417328741408288768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

loochy 07-20-2021 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15746787)
So Naomi Osaka is over her "social anxiety" that forced her to quit at Wimbledon?

https://imagesvc.meredithcorp.io/v3/...aomi-osaka.jpg


I don't get it. That dude isn't even hot...not a sexy body and not pretty. At least put a hot dude on the cover. That dude is dumpy, flat, and non shapely. At least Ashley Graham was pretty shaped sexily (albeit a bit too thick for my tastes).

ptlyon 07-20-2021 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15747428)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Since Victoria’s Secret turned woke, it has had to close hundreds of stores, and lost $275.2 Million this last quarter.</p>&mdash; ����ProudArmyBrat (@leslibless) <a href="https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1417328741408288768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Good

Bowser 07-20-2021 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15747428)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Since Victoria’s Secret turned woke, it has had to close hundreds of stores, and lost $275.2 Million this last quarter.</p>&mdash; ����ProudArmyBrat (@leslibless) <a href="https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1417328741408288768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Something woke, something something broke

Hammock Parties 07-20-2021 09:15 AM

You have to admit it's funny SI put a chick who looks like a dude, and a dude who looks like a chick on the cover of their magazine.

Maybe they should rebrand as a MAD-style magazine.

FloridaMan88 07-20-2021 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15747182)
People that watch tennis watch tennis, regardless of who's in the finals.

And again you miss the point... Osaka brings in the casual fan/viewer... the non-hardcore tennis fan who probably isn't going to watch an Ashleigh Barty-Karolina Pliskova Wimbledon final.

Similar to when Tiger Woods was in contention to win golf tournaments on Sunday's. Casual viewers are drawn in and the viewership goes up.

Not that hard to understand.

FloridaMan88 07-20-2021 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15747196)
The previous day’s Ashleigh Barty-Karolína Plíšková women’s final averaged just 1.09 million — down 55% from Simona Halep-Serena Williams in 2019 (2.44M) and the smallest audience for any Wimbledon singles final since ESPN began airing the event exclusively in 2011. The previous low was 1.33 million for Petra Kvitova-Eugenie Bouchard in 2014.

The Wimbledon women's final was down 55% when there was a lack of star power involved... which again proves the impact of no Osaka on TV ratings.

The TV ratings would have still likely been down in 2021 vs. 2019 because Osaka is not Serena in terms of star power, but they wouldn't have been 55% down.

Spott 07-20-2021 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15747458)
You have to admit it's funny SI put a chick who looks like a dude, and a dude who looks like a chick on the cover of their magazine.

Maybe they should rebrand as a MAD-style magazine.

I just assumed they were both dudes.

eDave 07-20-2021 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15747428)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Since Victoria’s Secret turned woke, it has had to close hundreds of stores, and lost $275.2 Million this last quarter.</p>&mdash; ����ProudArmyBrat (@leslibless) <a href="https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1417328741408288768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 15747438)
Good

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 15747443)
Something woke, something something broke

Their Q2 net sales were $1B. That's an increase of 77.7% from $626M for Q2 last year. They have been closing stores for quite some time.

You don't have to be woke to be awake, Gentlemen.

Bowser 07-20-2021 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15748096)
Their Q2 net sales were $1B. That's an increase of 77.7% from $626M for Q2 last year.

https://78.media.tumblr.com/19fdd86d...yq24o3_400.gif

Hammock Parties 07-20-2021 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15748096)
Their Q2 net sales were $1B. That's an increase of 77.7% from $626M for Q2 last year. They have been closing stores for quite some time.

Uh, COVID, dummy.

eDave 07-20-2021 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15748110)
Uh, COVID, dummy.

What about it? And where's the $275M loss and store closures rooted in being "woke"?

loochy 07-20-2021 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15748117)
What about it? And where's the $275M loss and store closures rooted in being "woke"?

Karma for being douchebags

eDave 07-20-2021 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 15748121)
Karma for being douchebags

They aren't douchebags. Just guys with an agenda.

But if you are referencing VS, outperforming previous periods through times of immense change and movement away from brick and mortor is the karma I'd like to have.

loochy 07-20-2021 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15748124)
Outperforming previous periods, through times of immense change and movement away from brick and mortor, is the karma I'd like to have.

Sorry, I read it as $275M loss instead of you questioning that.

I guess their douche karma didn't come yet. But they built up massive amounts of positive karma over the years by showing hot, scantily clad women in lacy things.

Rausch 07-20-2021 03:27 PM

I've changed, but not that much...

Bowser 07-20-2021 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15748124)
They aren't douchebags. Just guys with an agenda.

But if you are referencing VS, outperforming previous periods, through times of immense change and movement away from brick and mortor, is the karma I'd like to have.

Everybody give Dave a rousing round of boos for only giving a fraction of the story. Victoria's Secret is part of L Brands that also houses Bath and BodyWorks which drug Victoria's Secret out of the mud with their strong showing. AND, L Brands plans on separating the two entities in the near future.

https://www.just-style.com/news/l-br...et-sales-lift/

Point stands - get woke go broke. Eat that shit sammich you ordered, Dave.

Hammock Parties 07-20-2021 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 15748117)
What about it? And where's the $275M loss and store closures rooted in being "woke"?

Literally every retail ****ing tanked so of course they have massive "gains" now year over year.

They are losing money because their business model of catering to less attractive groups is ****ing shit.

JohnnyV13 07-21-2021 06:02 PM

You guys just aren't real men.

If a real man starts taking off his gf's clothes and finds a hard schlong, he gets on his hands and knees and gets right to work.

The rest of you are just transphobes.

Bowser 07-21-2021 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyV13 (Post 15749837)
You guys just aren't real men.

If a real man starts taking off his gf's clothes and finds a hard schlong, he gets on his hands and knees and gets right to work.

The rest of you are just transphobes.

Remember - it's not a chick with a dick, it's a dude with tits.

ptlyon 07-21-2021 09:09 PM

Holy shit! Johnny V sighting! And he likes to suck cock! Did. Not. Know. That!

Titty Meat 07-21-2021 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyV13 (Post 15749837)
You guys just aren't real men.

If a real man starts taking off his gf's clothes and finds a hard schlong, he gets on his hands and knees and gets right to work.

The rest of you are just transphobes.

Exactly. My fav is hitting it from the back with their toolie smacking your thigh


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.