Cheetah contract rumors
 

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chiefs giving Cheetah a 4 year 85 million dollar extension. 70 Guaranteed. <a href="https://twitter.com/610SportsKC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@610SportsKC</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ClayWendler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ClayWendler</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/1_ChiefsKingdom?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@1_ChiefsKingdom</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/benmaller?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@benmaller</a></p>&mdash; JudgeReid (@JudgeReid92) <a href="https://twitter.com/JudgeReid92/status/1499474840260161550?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

You just couldn’t resist another L huh?

69 followers, seems like another trustworthy source.

he has some connections

i'd put this at 90%

We’ll see.

Can you point to his connections or when he's been right in the past?

Rumor: Cheetah had originally requested $69 million guaranteed, because, uh, you know, but his hate for EB cost the Chiefs an extra mil.

**** EB! :cuss:

Intentionally posting misleading threads/thread titles in The Lounge is ban-worthy, correct?

Nice

Thread title is not misleading.

When has he called anything?

There is absolutely no truth to this whatsoever.

It’s not even a good shot at connecting the dots.

When his deal gets signed, it will be for more than 25m per.

Somebody posted last night that Tony Pauline said Tyreek was getting an extension. They didn't post a tweet or anything, just that Pauline said it.

I don't have a huge issue with this thread. Rumors aren't really a big deal (especially in the offseason) as long as we treat them as such. If nothing else, it's interesting to think about what IS a reasonable contract.

This seems high to me, but the cap is going up a lot, so it's not insane.

The extra mil is for duces expenses

Who is JudgeReids neighbor???

Just giving you grief.

What’s the lady working at the liquor store across from Arrowhead say??

Wanna see that contract......Almost


https://g.redditmedia.com/ZXaJ8dz1ps...gmented=false&

Source: Chiefs and Tyreek Hill's agent Drew Rosenhaus have engaged in positive talks on a possible extension for the WR #chiefskingdom @610SportsKC

Bob Fescoe

I believe.

4/85 would be a solid deal for KC, honestly. We'll see if it's true given the sources. ;)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Source: Chiefs and Tyreek Hill&#39;s agent Drew Rosenhaus have engaged in positive talks on a possible extension for the WR <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/chiefskingdom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#chiefskingdom</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/610SportsKC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@610SportsKC</a></p>&mdash; Bob Fescoe (@bobfescoe) <a href="https://twitter.com/bobfescoe/status/1499482516331405312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I'm just the opposite. I think this seems really reasonable and would take that immediately if I'm the Chiefs.

Bob's always saying vague ass shit that anyone could pull out of their ass with any knowledge of the team.

That actually seems like a pretty reasonable deal, if true.

Tyreek apparently not looking to break the bank on his next contract.


Good for the Chiefs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . if true.

Also if clay is endorsing this guy, then Im not liking the odds of this happening. Dammit

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I promise using that credit card hit different ��</p>&mdash; Ty Hill (@cheetah) <a href="https://twitter.com/cheetah/status/1499415346641621000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Tyreek Hill extension creates another 12.5 million dollars in cap space for Chiefs. Tyreek’s biggest cap hit will be 27.5 mill in 2026.</p>&mdash; JudgeReid (@JudgeReid92) <a href="https://twitter.com/JudgeReid92/status/1499481003328512004?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I'm betting the deal is closer to 4 years $100 mil. I've seen Davante Adams projected to get $25-$27 mil per year. Since Tyreek got ****ed last go around, then he's not going to take some team friendly deal.

I have corroborated this information with a back channel source.

Marty said sure?

Sir Martin is not involved in this scoop.

**** off. **** all the way off with your "back channel" sources. You have been proven to be a fraud with zero credibility.

Reek may very well get a contract extension, but you have zero inside information and you need to get hit by a bus.

bad fellowship detected

THAT DUDE NEEDS TO CHILL OUT

Not sure how anyone can buy what's being sold here after the last debacle.

We have Clay to thank for this extension. Many wanted reek out of here but Clay was able to expose the fake news.

4/85 seems like a bargain nowadays.

Which is another reason why this smells like bullshit.

Is the deal with the Chlefs

How a contract extension between Reek and Veach caused a season long rift??

Veach: “No, sign this”

Tyrann Mathieu: “What the ****.”

Orlando Brown Jr: “We’re blowing this offseason.”

Mahomes: “Sign the ****ing contract or I will.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I&#39;m told the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> and receiver Tyreek Hill&#39;s camp are indeed having positive conversations towards an extension, as first reported by <a href="https://twitter.com/TonyPauline?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TonyPauline</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/bobfescoe?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@bobfescoe</a>.<br><br>Talks are being described to me as in the early stages between the team and six-time Pro Bowler.</p>&mdash; Matt Verderame (@MattVerderame) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattVerderame/status/1499493472482566147?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chiefs off season objectives:<br>* Re-sign Orlando Brown<br>* Get a pass rusher<br>* Bring in a receiver<br>* Extend Tyreek Hill<a href="https://t.co/TprDsZNdCS">https://t.co/TprDsZNdCS</a></p>&mdash; Tony Pauline (@TonyPauline) <a href="https://twitter.com/TonyPauline/status/1499430469296955398?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Veach is about to use this money for a DE or WR in the first couple of days of FA.

His agent is Drew ****ing Rosenhaus.

No way in hell he’s accepting a deal for Tyreek that’s 20% lower than market value.

If an extension is for 4 years, it’s going to be for 105-115m…but I can see Tyreek taking 4-100 flat if the guarantees are way above average.

Hope it happens we need to get him and especially our OBJ handled. Leaves the possibility of tagging Badger available.

That + Hitch + Pat's probable restructure should have us sitting ready to spend.

Just because they can convert PMs $ for cap relief that doesn't mean the should.

If they can keep from doing so it keeps his cap hit in the future from being an issue.

I'm not saying we push it to the limit for this year (I think its a possible $26M?) but maybe half of it would be helpful for getting some work done.

They only have until March 8th to use the tag.

We may pay a lot for him but his last contract was an absolute steal.

I prefer to tag OBJ instead of HB.

It likely means a bigger payday next year, but I'd rather we get a bigger sample size of success before committing a huge amount to our 2nd most important position.

Poor non-ChiefsPlanet people have to settle for lukewarm updates like this. Fortunately for us we have the comfort and assuredness of knowing that the deal is basically already done.

Mathieu isn’t getting tagged. I remember seeing somewhere that it would be an exorbitant amount.

Let me see if I can find it.

Tyrann is as good as gone. They aren’t tagging him even if they get a deal done with Brown before the deadline.

Gotta agree, there's zero chance HB gets tagged.

They're going to tag Brown almost certainly, unless by some miracle they get a deal done over the weekend.

Sauces say Reek was gonna ask for 4/45 but since Clay wasn't banned from CP he bumped it to 4/85 for shit talkin his boy EB

But Clay helped exonerate him!

Bigger sample size?

Browns went to the last 3 probowls with half that time playing RT and half at LT.

He vastly improved as the year went on as a LT.

He doesn’t have injury concerns.

Hes young.

He’s got a HOF pedigree.

**** the noise…give him the appropriate contract and move on to other positions.

Dude. I could literally make tweets connecting the dots that would end up vastly more accurate than the junk you’ve posted today and over the last couple weeks.

Brown is going to get the tag but he won't end up playing on it. I'd say it's 99% likely that he's tagged and then signs later in the offseason.

Yup.

While I don't buy it, if that's indeed something Hill's willing to do, you take that shit and RUN.

If for no other reason than you've cut Brown's legs out from under him in contract negotiations. Now the threat of Hill on the tag evaporates so you've got Brown for this year at $14 millionish and next year at $18 millionish for a total of $32 million over the next two years.

If I can lock my LT in for 2 years at $16 million per and another 3 years at $23 million/per after that, it gives me 5 years, $101 million. It's more than Ronnie Stanley got so that should satisfy Brown and it's largely a sane figure. It uses the leverage from the tags to its fullest effect.

Honestly, I think it happens kinda fast, but I could see it taking till the deadline like it did with Chris. The tag money will count a lot towards the usable space for FA, so I’m sure Veach is trying to knock it out as fast as he can. Getting those 2 deals done dictates the rest of their moves ability to happen.

Rosenhaus has had a pretty good relationship with the KC brass for quite some time.

It's not been Steinberg's crew manipulating information to ensure Mahomes lands with Reid or anything, but it's been awfully cozy.

No, I don't think Rosenhaus signs off on this deal, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him come in under market. Moreover, Rosenhaus isn't QUITE the behemoth he was in the Terrell Owens days.

CAA is the big swinging dick right now with Condon and Dogra. Those are really the guys that can run your ass over the coals.

After that bullshit EB story, you should probably sit out the next couple plays.

Marty and I are not reporting on any Tyreek Hill news, thank you for reading the thread, however.

Uh...

Kinda feels like you're trying to have your cake and eat it too, here...

I didn't say anything about reporting.

I was inferring that you should probably just stop posting altogether.

You are very welcome for the thread I posted in which you are now posting, giving you something to do to distract you from this dreary thing we call life.

A post is not a report.

Hello Clay

YOU seem nice.

Like others, I’m skeptical on these numbers, 4/85 seems cheap when this is his in my prime deal. And he has Drew as an agent. Drew would not let him sign that deal.

Oh I'm well aware of how you intend to straddle the fence here.

It just felt worthwhile to point it out.

Could it also include a big signing bonus? I don't understand any of this shit so...