![]() |
Lions cutting Trey Flowers
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Lions have informed DE Trey Flowers that he will be released on the first day of the 2022 league year next week. Flowers has been nothing but class in Detroit, a good player hit hard by injuries the past 2 seasons.</p>— Dave Birkett (@davebirkett) <a href="https://twitter.com/davebirkett/status/1501988202294517770?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 10, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Does he have anything left?
|
There’s going to be a lot of talent added to the free agent DE group after cuts.
We know for sure we’ll get at least one, just a matter of who. I don’t think Flowers fits the profile, and he’s starting to look like a brokedick, but the more the better. |
I'm sure he has a few million laying around
|
Quote:
I’m sorry. |
He's been injured and more than likely would be on the cheaper side. Probably a one year deal to try and build his value again.
Has familiarity with Brendan Daly who is now the LB coach. |
not really interested unless vet minimum and is cool with being depth
|
He'll probably go back to New England though.
|
If you get cut by a last place team like Detroit, makes you wonder about the guy. Detroit needs all the help they can get.
|
Quote:
Really? Cutting a great player seems like the kind of thing a perennially terrible franchise would do. |
He will be 29 when the season starts and apart from last year, Trey has been really good every other year for the past 5.
If his price tag is reasonably low, he seems like a perfect 1-2 year reclamation project with high upside. Being he will be released, he also wouldn’t count against the comp pick formula, which is huge in an offseason we will lose Ward, Tyrann, Nnadi, Reed, Pringle and a few others to FA on expired contracts that should all land elsewhere on new deals. |
Quote:
|
If hes healthy he could probably be Clark for less than what we would pay Clark should we retain him.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think he’s the one guy we keep. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The problem is really that Flowers has had 2 seasons lost to injury rather than Ingrams 1. And when that starts to happen, to whatever those guys are ever 'healthy' again, they've really lost something in the exchange. They never seem to get back to even a reasonable facsimile of what they once were. I wouldn't be willing to outbid NE for him and NE will probably not have to offer him much more than a couple million. |
Quote:
I'd do this thing, now. If we're going to beef up this DL, we're going to need some solid additions that won't break the bank and, I hope, one big ticket addition. DeForest Buckner getting cut in San Francisco, maybe? |
Assuming both Flowers and Collins cost the same - who do you take?
I think it's far more likely that Collins makes a meaningful contribution, though I think the change to truly make an impact would be a little higher for Flowers. With Collins I think you have an 80% chance of getting a valuable rotational box safety and clear upgrade on Sorensen. A 20% chance he's a brokedick. With Flowers I think you get a 66% chance of a dude that's not healthy enough to mean anything and not effective enough when on the field due to those injuries to matter. That leaves about a 33% chance he's a genuine starting caliber SDE. Of the two, I prefer Collins. You just can't count on a guy with that kind of bust potential. |
Quote:
You thinking Armstead? |
LMAO
|
Quote:
Veach gets a lot of credit for what he did for the OL last season, but he didn't get enough credit for the depth he built. That OL was two-deep at every position. Niang, Long, Allegretti, Blythe, and Wylie could have started on other teams. We need that depth here. I suspect we bring back Ingram, but Ingram has an injury history -- back that position up. We only have one legit backup on the team right now in Danna. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
two questions: is he cheaper than frank clark? is he better than frank clark?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We have a desperate need for bodies at both positions. Personally, I take the DE. |
:facepalm:
There is absolutely no chance that the Colts cut DeForest Buckner LMAO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And S > IR You have to weigh the potential return against the odds of actually getting that. It's how you calculate the settlement value of a lawsuit. If you have a case with say $10 million in potential damages and a 40% chance of actually winning, you have a case worth roughly $4 million dollars. If you have a case worth $6 million and an 70% chance of winning, your $6 million case is actually worth roughly $4.2 million (after subtracting the costs of litigation, but now we're going too deep in the weeds). In other words, the more lucrative case is actually the less 'valuable' one. In this case you have a DE in Flowers who may be a $10 million player if he hits, but he's 35% likely to be that guy. So he's 'worth' $3.5 million. Whereas in Collins case he may be a $5 million dollar player but he's 80% likely to hit that mark so he's 'worth' $4 million. Such is my calculus anyway. It's the variation in the figures that creates the question. I'm just saying that when it gets down to it, the latter is the guy I'd rather have with the values that I'm assigning them. |
Lorenzo Carter and Landon Collins please
|
Quote:
I minimize my fears of injury, though. I figure if I can get him on the field for 50% of the downs this coming season, he'll stay healthy and it'll be a win. |
Quote:
Guy has a base salary of $11 million. Teams would be lining up around the block to throw no worse than a 3rd rounder Indy's way to take on that deal at that cap hit. You could probably get a 2nd out of him. He'll likely get cut NEXT season. But there's no way they're cutting him this year with $70 million in cap room and no genuine reason to do so. |
Quote:
I mean it ain't like we have a ton of depth behind him if he's truly broken down. |
Quote:
But the cost of Collins compared to what we’re going to ask him to do….isn’t worth it. |
Quote:
If you got 2016 Dan Sorensen out of him, you wouldn't think that was a damn good use of $4-5 million in cap? I think Collins could easily give you that level of play. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I'm not interested in a safety that struggles in coverage.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Teams are too good at identifying matchups like that. You need versatility, no specialization.
|
Quote:
That absolutely has value, albeit limited. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Didn’t he play for Spags in NY? |
pay a free agent safety or pay Ward...prob cost the same
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.