![]() |
The DL is more self-suffient.
Some factoids about our passrush:
The Chiefs ended the year 2nd in the league in sacks, with 55 total. Jones had 15.5 -- ridiculous. The next four top sack-rackers were our DEs, which I guess is good. Karlaftis 6, Clark 5, Danna 5, Dunlap 4. Saunders/Wharton/Williams combined for 5 sacks on the season. The blitzers put up 14.5 all year. 7 from the LBs. 7.5 from the DBs. I noticed around the bye week that blitzers accounted for roughly a third of our sacks. I haven't looked up pressures, but I'm going to assume the numbers are similar there. End of the season, they accounted for 26% of our sacks. The number dropped exactly for the reason you think: Week 12 vs. Rams: 3 total sacks, 1 from blitz Week 13 vs Bengals: 1 total sack, 0 from blitz Week 14 vs. Broncos: 6 total sacks, 1.5 from blitz Week 15 vs. Texans: 1 total sack, 0 from blitz Week 16 vs. Seahawks: 2 total sacks, 0 from blitz Week 17 vs. Broncos: 4 total sacks, 1 from blitz Week 18 vs. Raiders: 6 total sacks, 1 from blitz The last seven games of the season, blitzes accounted for 4.5 out of 23 sacks, or 19%. I don't know if Spags is blitzing less, or if the blitzes are getting less effective. I think the biggest factor is that the DL is rushing somewhat more effectively, led by Jones and Karlaftis. --> In that same 7 week timespan, Jones has put up 6.5 sacks, and Karlaftis has put up 5.5 sacks. Considering how important it's going to be to beat Burrow (and maybe Allen?) without blitzing, that's a very big development for the defense. |
Danna seems to have a knack for knocking the ball loose when he gets to the QB. I really like him.
|
I'd like to see Georgie continue his hot streak into the playoffs, and playoffs Clark to come out of the wood work.
|
Quote:
|
If you can add a real edge bending speed guy across the from Karlaftis and have Jones and add maybe another interior DT, this DL gets really interesting.
|
Quote:
|
I want nothing more than for Clark to set the all time postseason sack record
|
Danna had a much better performances than I gave him credit for during the last couple games. Looking forward to him continuing that trend. DL has been making some plays recently. Also, someone recognized it; Spags is blitzing quite bit less the last few weeks, and we're still getting sacks.
|
It's interesting how the defense looks better against shitty teams.
|
Quote:
He’s been a valuable Jack of all trades player who has been an excellent interior rusher next to Chris Jones on passing downs. I wonder if Veach tries to extend him early to a team friendly deal? Say what you want but this was a fantastic draft pick for a day 3 guy |
If I'm not mistaking, I actually saw a double team on George at one point last game. He's had an even bigger impact than what's been said. Partly as a result, Jones had a field day. Lol
(One of the few games our pass rush was stale was against CIN. They had a pair of good T's and doubled Jones. Since then George has been ramping it up and CIN lost a key piece in their OL with Collins going to IR. We're going to need to have every ounce this DL has in order to disrupt Burrow and the three headed monster that is CIN's passing game.) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We're sacrificing some elite edge setting for pressuring the QB but so far it appears to be working.
|
Quality of opponents is definitely in play here.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jones - 40 Clark - 23 Karlaftis - 20 Dunlap - 17 Danna - 16 Sneed - 10 Saunders - 8 Bolton - 7 Wharton - 5 Reid - 4 Gay - 4 Cook - 3 Chenal - 3 Thornhill - 2 McDuffie - 2 Harris - 2 B. Williams - 2 J. Williams - 1 Fenton - 1 Stallworth - 1 |
Quote:
|
it's so ****ing awesome that karlaftis is getting hot right at the perfect time.
and Dunlop has had a very amazing season too. everything coming together nicely. I am looking forward to these guys getting tested by a playoff team |
Quote:
|
I wouldn’t be surprised if Williams has helped a lot.
|
Quote:
They're good until they play elite offenses. |
Quote:
Our safety play has drastically improved. Next year tho has a chance to be special defense, like a legit top 10. Just need to find another edge rusher to replace Clark. But I knew this year would be a learning year. |
Quote:
|
They have been better at pass rush but we play better teams in the playoffs. I was unimpressed when we played the Chargers, Bengals and Buffalo. We gotta be able to get home against them but we did get Lawence more so hopefully we play them if not the dream game of the Ravens.
|
Just get to Burrow.
The rest is masturbating. I cannot for the life of me figure out why this team cannot touch Joe Burrow. The rest of the league beats him like a rented mule when they send 3 and yet we can't even get his damn jersey dirty when we send 6. I don't get it and at this point I don't even care what the cause is. Fix it. Go hit that MFer. The rest will sort itself out. |
Quote:
I believe you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who's down on Mike Danna. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I want 2019 playoff Frank Clark to show up.
Dude wrecked games singlehandedly. |
Quote:
|
Danna basically getting 5 sacks from the DT position this year is underrated Spags genious
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
4th meeting. Entire right side of his OL is out. It’s time to finally take one from them. |
Quote:
Sent from my moto g stylus 5G using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Like I said, I don't even care about the Why of it. Largely because I'm flummoxed by it. But it just can't happen again. Those WRs are just too good to give Burrow that kind of time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Regardless, the Bengals punted 1 time the entire game and moved the ball at will. KC’s offense was the only solid defense against Cincy’s offense. Chiefs offense ran a lot of clock and kept Burrow/Chase on sidelines. Obviously the Bengals did the same thing to keep Mahomes on the sideline as much as possible. Both teams were using ball control approach, which helped keep the score below 30 for each team. |
Quote:
Pay them no nevermind. If 'Playoff Frank' actually exists then **** that dude for taking his other 60 games off. |
Quote:
It was completely unacceptable to only manage 1 sack against that OL with that type of lead. The defense was alright overall, but that was an inexcusable performance from the pass rush. Great time for Jones to have a dominant performance and leave no doubt that he’s one of the true stars of the league. He should be motivated for it. |
Quote:
There's other things as well, like the fact that his OL was pretty bad early in the season, but improved rapidly, so when we faced them they were gelling and not the same OL they were early. But yeah, if we can't get consistent pressure, and cover much better than the last two times we faced him, it'll be a long day. The issue, imo, is mostly about consistency. We have the athletes to be a top-10-12 defense, the players with the higher football IQ, etc., but we've really lacked consistency in communication, situational awareness and execution. Particularly at LB and S. So, while the defense as improved statistically these last 5 weeks or so, it's also true that KC has faced a significantly lower quality of opponent over that stretch, making it tougher to read. What's concerning is that while playing the likes of DEN/HOU, they allowed a very high scoring efficiency, mostly TDs vs. FGs. That's a big problem, especially when viewed through the lens of the QBs/offenses KC faced. In nearly every other statistical respect, the Chiefs defense played fairly well, but not in that one, which is obviously the most important one. Of course, turnovers didn't help them, but at least twice against both DEN and HOU they allowed TDs that were just far too easy. Especially when the QBs that executed those scoring drives were guys like Wilson, Davis, etc. However, they've been playing better over the last couple weeks. Just lacked consistency in the DEN game, and a couple ticky-tack penalties in the second half of the DEN game make it look a little worse than it was. Anway, I don't entirely discount the edge that recent success/confidence can bring either. They could take that and run with it through the playoffs, but at the end of the day, the front 7 will have to play better and be more consistent to beat CIN, period. It will help a ton if we don't have to face Cheffers in the playoffs as well.:thumb: |
Quote:
He was sacked 19 times in 4 post season games last year. Hell Pat went 14 games in the 2019 regular season and was only sacked 17 times. Raiders - 2 times Titans - 9! times Chiefs - 1 time Rams - 7 times If we can't get to him, then it's gonna be a close game. I like our chances, because if Jones is getting double teamed I think Karlaftis can beat the 1 on 1 more now, since he looks to be getting better week after week. |
Quote:
Frank's not a game-wrecker; never has been. Okay, maybe one year when he was still with SEA. But his career doesn't suggest he's ever been a game-wrecker. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yep, Spags started having Sneed follow their WR1 around in the SEA game with DK. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was talking about just following a guy around the whole game. That's not Spags style really, but since the SEA game, Sneed has pretty much been following the other team's WR1 around from start to finish, I think. Whatever. It's not just Sneed being on their WR1 that's making the difference. The significant side benefit is that it has moved Trent to the slot, which has paid some nice dividends in the secondary, allowing him to be a kind of HB lite there. That should cover some of the issues we've been having with Reid/Thornhill, allows Reid to play closer to the LoS, and still allows Thorny to protect the deep zones on whatever guy Sneed isn't on. |
Shart is gonna explode in the playoffs
|
Quote:
I hope that he gets healthy, and has something similar to his 2019 playoff performance. That would go a long way towards helping the team earn another Ring. |
We led the league in sacks the last year grandpa Bob was here.
Sack totals do not necessarily matter. When you can reliably get pressure on the QB does and in key situations. Garbage time sacks should not even be a stat. Like if you are up 30 to 10 in 4th quarter. Who cares but what you can dial up on 3rd downs when it matters or on 2nd and short and how your defense plays the run and pass well at the same time |
Quote:
2019 308 2020 362 2021 364 2022 369 QB Pressures : 2019 145 2020 156 2021 183 2022 171 Sacks : 2019 45 2020 32 2021 31 2022 55 Interceptions : 2019 16 2020 16 2021 15 2022 11 Total Yards Allowed 2019 5,593 2020 6,117 2021 6,619 2022 6,201 Missed Tackles : 2019 101 2020 119 2021 93 2022 77 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course it's possible the Bengals don't make it past Buffalo. That's one advantage KC now has on the Bengals. Last year Cincy got to play weaker QB's in Carr/Tannehill, while KC had a full blown knock down drag-out fight with Josh Allen & Buffalo. This year it's the reverse. Burrow & Cincy will have to get past Buffalo, which could be some kind of crazy overtime game. |
Can they sack/hurry the good QBs who aren't statues and have multiple weapons?
|
Quote:
It's not easy to contain/sack mobile QBs, even if they aren't that good, but now you want to do it all the time against good ones? With multiple top-tier weapons? What year do you think this is? They're better than average, statistically speaking. Considering the players we have on the table, that's pretty good. You want the 85 Bears, you're simply out of luck. We don't have HOFers/perennial All-Pros all over the defense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It obviously remains to be seen. My opinion, which can't get you a cup of coffee anywhere, is that Spags will have to dial up some blitzes in key moments and roll the dice with the LBs/Ss covering better than they have most of the season. It's just the reality of the situation. Reid and Thornhill played their best games last Saturday, so there's some hope they won't get gashed repeatedly when he does send an extra blitzer. But even then, sometimes the OL blocks everybody. It happens. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2012 425 26.5 PPG (2-11) 2013 305 19.0 PPG (11-5) 2014 281 17.5 PPG (9-7) 2015 287 17.9 PPG (11-5) 2016 311 19.4 PPG (12-4) 2017 339 21.18 PPG (10-6) 2018 421 26.3 PPG (12-4) 2019 308 19.2 PPG (12-4) 2020 362 22.6 PPG (14-2) 2021 364 21.4 PPG (12-5) 2022 369 21.7 PPG (14-3) QB Pressures : 2018 197 12.3 PrPG 2019 145 9.0 PrPG 2020 156 9.7 PrPG 2021 183 10.76 PrPG 2022 171 10.05 PrPG Sacks : 2018 52 3.2 SPG 2019 45 2.8 SPG 2020 32 2.0 SPG 2021 31 1.8 SPG 2022 55 3.2 SPG Interceptions : 2018 15 2019 16 2020 16 2021 15 2022 11 Total Yards Allowed 2018 6,810 425.6 YPG 2019 5,593 349.5 YPG 2020 6,117 382.3 YPG 2021 6,619 389.3 YPG 2022 6,201 364.76 YPG YAC: 2018 2067 129.1 YACPG 2019 1865 116.5 YACPG 2020 2087 130.4 YACPG 2021 2446 143.8 YACPG 2022 2037 119.8 YACPG Missed Tackles : 2018 116 2019 101 2020 119 2021 93 2022 77 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah, 7 tackles, 4 solo, a run stuff, a PD, and the INT. |
Quote:
I swear he does that with the secondary. Anyway, i think he's figured out somethings about what works and doesn't work on the DL, or rather Cullen has. So I think there's a better than even chance the DL will be able to be significantly more effective against the CIN OL if they meet in the playoffs. I wouldn't necessarily bet my house on it, but I think it'll happen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Some things that come to mind...
-Holy shit! 2nd in sacks in a year the entire fanbase believes we have a poor pass rush -Keep Jones. -Karlaftis will continue to improve, this was his floor for the next 5 years+ -Not sure if DL is as high a draft need as prev thought, but imagine adding another star! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Spags doesn't really have a 'scheme' in the way a Fangio has a 'scheme'. Other than generally showing one thing pre-snap and doing something else post-snap and creative blitzes. One of the reasons he doesn't just lock a specific corner up on a specific receiver all that much is because that's one easy read for the QB. I think the idea is that the QB theoretically should have to instantly read the defense post snap as we don't show them any truth beforehand. We can debate the merits of that, but I find the concept solid. |
I think the fact that our safety play has improved is huge. For most of the season our safety unit was horrible. They were on the field, but not making any plays at all. They weren't supporting our LBs on tackles and they sure as hell weren't providing over-the-top support for our corners. I cannot imagine that they suddenly became better football players, so I suspect a scheme change of some sort has yielded tremendous results in their effectiveness. Have any of you noticed a scheme change???
|
Quote:
But given all the things he does do well, plus his length and willingness to be physical, he can play press man with the opposing team's WR1, and even if he gets beat early, he has the speed and length to get back into the fight. And really, if I understand Spags philosophy at all, that's all Sneed has to do. Be physical, delay the WR long enough to kill any timing routes, and be sticky enough downfield to make most QBs cancel that route. For about 4 seconds. For the top-tier/elite QBs that are going to try and come back to their WR1 down the sideline, Sneed's long speed, physicality, and length forces the QB to make a great-to-elite throw in a tight spot, and if our deep safety is doing their job correctly, they're throwing into a rapidly closing window, and the ball has to be perfectly placed to even have a chance. I mean, when I think about how Burrow and Chase like to operate, which is a lot of deep sideline back shoulder type plays, what you need is a DB that is very physical, sticky, has great long speed, and has that height/length to fight for those 50/50 balls downfield. A guy like Trent, as good as he is, and that much more fluid, just isn't as hard to throw over as Sneed is. Plus, Trent's ability to flip his hips and short area acceleration, make him an ideal slot DB. And since most slot receivers aren't much bigger than he is, his lack of size isn't a big deal. And, technically just based on how the slot lines up, he doesn't have to be very physical, though I think McDuffie is a pretty physical DB. Anyway, my theory is that Sneed doesn't have to be Darrelle Revis the way Spags schemes his defense. he doesn't have to stick to the guy forever on an island. He just has to be able to do it for about 4 seconds, then he's probably either going to get help, or it's a footrace down the sideline, and Sneed can hold his own in that scenario. He's pretty good at using the sideline and his body to slow down receivers. You're going to have to make a very low-percentage/high-level of difficulty throw to beat Sneed 35+ yards down field along the sideline. Anyway, if all that is working, and Reid is patrolling closer to the LoS, it takes some heat off the LBs in coverage; they just have less area to cover, and one less responsibility. Then we just have to get pressure in less than 4 seconds (probably ideally less than 3) from the down four, force the QB off his spot, which destroys a timing route, and make a scrambling QB have to checkdown, or run, or throw it away. Or put it up for grabs. Anyway, that's the general idea, from what Spags has said and from what the analysts are breaking down from the tape. The weak links this season have been the rookie DBs outside of Trent, and the LBs poor coverage. Having Reid in/near the box, and Trent in the slot mitigates some of those short-comings. Or it's supposed to. Oh, an before someone freaks out, I'm not saying our rooks are bad. I think they're doing a pretty good job. But they aren't Sneed, or Trent. If you're a QB playing our D, you're going to pick on those guys every time instead of throwing at Sneed/Trent, just from the math perspective. Anyway, at this point I don't know if I even answered the question. But I got to go. If I didn't, I'll try to do better next time. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.