ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL Trade Rumors: Rams WR Allen Robinson to Patrick Mahomes' Chiefs? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348197)

DenverChief 04-02-2023 06:45 PM

Trade Idea: Rams WR Allen Robinson to Patrick Mahomes' Chiefs
 
Quote:


The Los Angeles Rams need high picks in order to retool the roster and turn the ship around.

Only problem? They don't have that many.

While the 11 selections the Rams have are valuable, eight of those picks come after No. 150 overall. The team's three picks outside of those come on Day 2, and

Los Angeles could use another one.

Bleacher Report suggests an idea that could land them another mid-round pick, trading wide receiver Allen Robinson II to the Kansas City Chiefs.

The Chiefs are seeking a top wideout for Patrick Mahomes after JuJu Smith-Schuster signed with the New England Patriots in free agency, and Robinson fits the build.

The timing of this deal could be a little tricky though.
If the Rams were to trade Robinson before the draft in order to acquire a pick for this year, Los Angeles would save a mere $1.6 million in cap space. However, if the team had some patience and waited until after June 1, the Rams would save $10 million.

Last spring, Robinson signed a three-year, $46.5 million deal with the Rams. His contract carries cap hits north of $18 million for the upcoming 2023 and 2024 seasons -- clearly a situation the front office wants to avoid taking on.

Robinson is talented but managed to catch just 33 passes for 339 yards and three touchdowns in his first season with the Rams, failing to reach the high expectations placed upon him when he came to Los Angeles.

A divorce could be best for both sides, and the Chiefs could bring out the best in Robinson with arguably the league's best quarterback throwing to him.

https://www.si.com/nfl/rams/.amp/new...atrick-mahomes

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sean McVay today, on the Rams giving WR Allen Robinson permission to seek a trade: &quot;Clear communication. Allen is a great person and he&#39;s been a great player for a long time. You talk to him and you say, &#39;this is a possibility that we&#39;re exploring, that we might move you. But</p>&mdash; Jourdan Rodrigue (@JourdanRodrigue) <a href="https://twitter.com/JourdanRodrigue/status/1640844153813860352?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 28, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">if we don&#39;t, I want you to know that I&#39;m going to pour everything I have into you as a player and try to reach your highest potential, make sure it&#39;s an enjoyable experience where you love coming into work.&#39; That&#39;s exactly where we&#39;ve left it. I don&#39;t think it&#39;s uncomfortable</p>&mdash; Jourdan Rodrigue (@JourdanRodrigue) <a href="https://twitter.com/JourdanRodrigue/status/1640844155030233088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 28, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Bowser 04-02-2023 06:50 PM

*looks at Robinson's contract*

https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.a65cffa5...pid=ImgRaw&r=0

I was all about Robinson two years ago? last offseason? But now, with that contract? Eh.....what are we talking about, here? A fifth? Fourth?

To try and put a positive spin on it - Randy Moss was traded to the Pats from the Raiders for a fourth round pick, so maybe it has the potential to work?


DISCLAIMER: Allen RobinsonII is not and will never be Randy Moss

TinyEvel 04-02-2023 06:51 PM

A totally amazing player.....in 2015

Abba-Dabba 04-02-2023 06:53 PM

Ideas like that only come from tranq users. Hopefully that idea dies as soon as the users do.

chiefzilla1501 04-02-2023 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 16886841)
*looks at Robinson's contract*

https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.a65cffa5...pid=ImgRaw&r=0

I was all about Robinson two years ago? last offseason? But now, with that contract? Eh.....what are we talking about, here? A fifth? Fourth?

To try and put a positive spin on it - Randy Moss was traded to the Pats from the Raiders for a fourth round pick, so maybe it has the potential to work?


DISCLAIMER: Allen RobinsonII is not and will never be Randy Moss

Contract looks pretty good to me if we want a cheap bandaid. I believe LAR already paid his roster bonus. And they’ve paid out his signing bonus. So it’d be $10m this year and $16m next year. Which we can void if Robinson sucks this year or if we find a young replacement.

Hammock Parties 04-02-2023 07:06 PM

if you need to pull the fire alarm i guess

Womble 04-02-2023 07:08 PM

Counter offer: Straight swap, Cooper Kupp for Clyde.

RedinTexas 04-02-2023 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Womble (Post 16886870)
Counter offer: Straight swap, Cooper Kupp for Clyde.

Get this to Verch ASAP.

Bowser 04-02-2023 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16886862)
Contract looks pretty good to me if we want a cheap bandaid. I believe LAR already paid his roster bonus. And they’ve paid out his signing bonus. So it’d be $10m this year and $16m next year. Which we can void if Robinson sucks this year or if we find a young replacement.

That would help. I didn't look at the details of his deal, just the average of his deal

nychief 04-02-2023 07:15 PM

Conditional 7th or wait for him to be released.

BigRedChief 04-02-2023 07:20 PM

You sell out to win a SB. You knew there’d be pain selling out for a one year run. At least you got a SB trophy. Take your pain.

Robinson for a 1st? WTF?

Dunerdr 04-02-2023 07:25 PM

So they want *adjusts glasses* another pick after 150?

The perfect deal. It leaves the chiefs wanting for a top receiver still, and the rams still wanting a top pick.

Chris Meck 04-02-2023 07:26 PM

**** that.

Too old, too expensive.

BossChief 04-02-2023 07:27 PM

I doubt the validity of this.

Dunerdr 04-02-2023 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16886902)
I doubt the validity of this.

It’s getting harder to Belize the internet with every passing day.

JohnnyHammersticks 04-02-2023 07:28 PM

My wet dreams of pairing Allen Robinson with Tyreek Hill a few years ago are well-documented on ChiefsPlanet, but that dude is like a shot fighter at this point. Punch drunk. Nothing left. His game fell right off a cliff.

Rainbarrel 04-02-2023 07:32 PM

Cedric Wilson also being theorized as available

Chiefshrink 04-02-2023 07:33 PM

Veach chuckles:LOL:

TwistedChief 04-02-2023 07:36 PM

There’s a big difference between a rumor and a guy throwing random potential trades at a wall that he thinks might make sense to justify his existence as an online journalist.

This is the latter and he makes that clear. There’s nothing about this that deserves the characterization of “rumor.” Thread title is unnecessarily misleading.

Why Not? 04-02-2023 07:40 PM

Not convinced 2023 Allan Robinson is significantly better than say, Justin Watson. He is, however, significantly more expensive. Pass.

chiefzilla1501 04-02-2023 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16886916)
There’s a big difference between a rumor and a guy throwing random potential trades at a wall that he thinks might make sense to justify his existence as an online journalist.

This is the latter and he makes that clear. There’s nothing about this that deserves the characterization of “rumor.” Thread title is unnecessarily misleading.

I think there’s a very good chance he gets moved. For sure it’s a rumor to suspect any team is interested in him yet.

There’s still a surprising amount of offseason left. You expect guys like jeudy, tee Higgins, Keenan Allen, mike Williams, DHop to move. We still have some mega mega qb contracts that haven’t hit yet.

RaidersOftheCellar 04-02-2023 07:46 PM

I’m assuming the Rams would pay part of the ‘23 salary and KC would restructure the rest of his deal. May not be a terrible plan.

ThyKingdomCome15 04-02-2023 07:48 PM

This is NOT thread worthy.

Megatron96 04-02-2023 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 16886934)
This is NOT thread worthy.

I don't see why not. It's a fact that we're completely clueless as to which JAG WR "reclamation project" Veach is going to sign to replace JuJu at this point. AR is as likely as any.

bigjosh 04-02-2023 07:57 PM

Robinson aNd nagy had a great relationship in Chicago right?


Right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

493rd 04-02-2023 08:01 PM

This was some random opinion-piece article on Fanside nothing more. There’s no “smoke” here whatsoever and this isn’t worthy of its own thread.

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 16886934)
This is NOT thread worthy.

I see the internet bandwidth police have popped up again....

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 493rd (Post 16886954)
This was some random opinion-piece article on Fanside nothing more. There’s no “smoke” here whatsoever and this isn’t worthy of its own thread.

Here is the other stuff from the Bleacher source

Quote:

The Arizona Cardinals have been open to dealing wide receiver DeAndre Hopkins this offseason, but they haven't found a trade partner yet. That could change now that Arizona has opened the door for teams to speak with Hopkins directly.

"The Cardinals' initial ask, to get a second-rounder and another asset for Hopkins, seems to have fallen flat," Albert Breer of Sports Illustrated wrote Monday. "... To try to facilitate something, I'm told Arizona has granted teams permission to talk to Hopkins and his agents."

Hopkins is 30 years old and coming off a season shortened by a performance-enhancing drug suspension, but he's still one of the better wideouts in the league. In nine games this past season, he caught 64 passes for 717 yards and three touchdowns.

Meanwhile, the Kansas City Chiefs lost receivers JuJu Smith-Schuster and Mecole Hardman in free agency. Hopkins would be a terrific go-to target for quarterback Patrick Mahomes, and Kansas City is at least somewhat interested.

According to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler, the Chiefs are among the teams who "are at least looking" at a Hopkins trade. Fowler also mentioned the Buffalo Bills, who are seeking depth behind Stefon Diggs and Gabe Davis.

Buffalo's reported interest in Hopkins could force the hand of Chiefs general manager Brett Veach. If he isn't amenable to surrendering a second-round pick, a third-rounder might do the trick.

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16886916)
There’s a big difference between a rumor and a guy throwing random potential trades at a wall that he thinks might make sense to justify his existence as an online journalist.

This is the latter and he makes that clear. There’s nothing about this that deserves the characterization of “rumor.” Thread title is unnecessarily misleading.


Thread title is title of article :shrug:

Jamie 04-02-2023 08:15 PM

https://i.imgur.com/YuFweiV.jpeg

Chris Meck 04-02-2023 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16886940)
I don't see why not. It's a fact that we're completely clueless as to which JAG WR "reclamation project" Veach is going to sign to replace JuJu at this point. AR is as likely as any.

No he's not.

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie (Post 16886984)

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/BtEw37CXZti8yfq3Ke" width="480" height="315" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/PermissionIO-power-bruce-almighty-ive-got-the-BtEw37CXZti8yfq3Ke">via GIPHY</a></p>

Megatron96 04-02-2023 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16886988)
No he's not.

Sure he is. He's basically Sammy 2.0. Well, close enough anyway.

TwistedChief 04-02-2023 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16886976)
Thread title is title of article :shrug:

That's a pretty terrible defense. Lots of stuff on the internet is nonsensical clickbait and it doesn't mean you need to fall for that, let alone perpetuate that by re-posting it elsewhere with the same title.

TwistedChief 04-02-2023 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16886928)
I think there’s a very good chance he gets moved. For sure it’s a rumor to suspect any team is interested in him yet.

There’s still a surprising amount of offseason left. You expect guys like jeudy, tee Higgins, Keenan Allen, mike Williams, DHop to move. We still have some mega mega qb contracts that haven’t hit yet.

No, you don't expect guys like Higgins, Allen, and Williams to move. That's pretty much already been established this offseason.

I don't think it's a stretch to say there's a good chance AR might be moved after they traded away Jalen Ramsey. The Rams are in full re-build mode as best as they can with a limited number of picks. AR was a massssssive disappointment last season not because of the QB's play but because of his own limitations. The idea that the Chiefs are going to trade anything for a guy who looks clearly washed up and **has a very well-publicized poor history with our OC** is fairly comical.

I'd rather go into next season with our current WR corps than give up much of anything of value for AR, and I'd be surprised if Veach sees it much different. Hence, this speculation is dumb.

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16886993)
That's a pretty terrible defense. Lots of stuff on the internet is nonsensical clickbait and it doesn't mean you need to fall for that, let alone perpetuate that by re-posting it elsewhere with the same title.

Fact: The Rams have given Robinson permission to seek a trade
Fact: Chiefs are interested in trading for a veteran receiver
Fact: Chiefs have been rumored to be feeling around the league for many WR's (Ayuk, DeHop, etc)

Just because you don't "like" the article. You can feel free to not open the thread yes?

TwistedChief 04-02-2023 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16886998)
Fact: The Rams have given Robinson permission to seek a trade
Fact: Chiefs are interested in trading for a veteran receiver
Fact: Chiefs have been rumored to be feeling around the league for many WR's (Ayuk, DeHop, etc)

Just because you don't "like" the article. You can feel free to not open the thread yes?

Yes, but I opened the thread because it was expressed that there was a rumor that the Chiefs are interested in him. And there's no evidence of that in the article you posted.

Couch-Potato 04-02-2023 08:34 PM

Not at that price

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16887000)
Yes, but I opened the thread because it was expressed that there was a rumor that the Chiefs are interested in him. And there's no evidence of that in the article you posted.

Wait...you are looking for credibility to a rumor? Shall I remind you what the definition of a rumor is?

Quote:

currently circulating story or report of uncertain or doubtful truth.

RaidersOftheCellar 04-02-2023 08:41 PM

I think they’re ultimately going to sign Beckham. There seems to be legit interest there, and I think they’re just waiting for the price to come down. Which it will. Bet they eventually sign him for around 7-8 mil, with incentives for a few mil more.

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 16887009)
I think they’re ultimately going to sign Beckham. There seems to be legit interest there, and I think they’re just waiting for the price to come down. Which it will. Bet they eventually sign him for around 7-8 mil, with incentives for a few mil more.

I agree - I don't think Veach wants to part with his draft picks - especially with as well as we have been drafting - but I could also see him pulling the trigger on a deal that makes another team eat some salary and a swap of draft picks

TwistedChief 04-02-2023 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16887004)
Wait...you are looking for credibility to a rumor? Shall I remind you what the definition of a rumor is?

This isn't even that. This is a guy speculating about a potential landing spot. How hard is that to understand?

Quote:

Bleacher Report suggests an idea that could land them another mid-round pick, trading wide receiver Allen Robinson II to the Kansas City Chiefs.
If I suggested that the Chiefs could trade Mahomes this offseason and started a thread about it, would that make it a "rumor" according to your definition?

This would be meaningful if it suggested that the Chiefs had interest in AR. Then it would be a "rumor." You can't seriously not understand the difference.

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16887015)
This isn't even that. This is a guy speculating about a potential landing spot. How hard is that to understand?



If I suggested that the Chiefs could trade Mahomes this offseason and started a thread about it, would that make it a "rumor" according to your definition?

This would be meaningful if it suggested that the Chiefs had interest in AR. Then it would be a "rumor." You can't seriously not understand the difference.

The difference is that the Chiefs have been exploring trade options with other teams for WR's - that single thread makes it more plausible than a "story' about the Chiefs wanting to trade Patrick - that is the difference.

I'm sorry your day was ruined.

Chief Pagan 04-02-2023 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16887004)
Wait...you are looking for credibility to a rumor? Shall I remind you what the definition of a rumor is?

Hot rumor, we're trading Sneed for D'Hop.*



*I heard it on CP

DenverChief 04-02-2023 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Pagan (Post 16887021)
Hot rumor, we're trading Sneed for D'Hop.*



*I heard it on CP


<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/uJmg4C752N8Q3uC1J4" width="480" height="480" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/abcnetwork-steve-harvey-judge-abc-uJmg4C752N8Q3uC1J4">via GIPHY</a></p>

Titty Meat 04-02-2023 09:36 PM

Why wouldn't they just cut him? He's a broke dick at this point noway anyone gives a pick for him

Bowser 04-02-2023 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16887059)
Why wouldn't they just cut him? He's a broke dick at this point noway anyone gives a pick for him

No idea what his dead cap number is if they cut him, but I bet it's more than they're willing to pay.

Titty Meat 04-02-2023 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 16887060)
No idea what his dead cap number is if they cut him, but I bet it's more than they're willing to pay.

Just looked it up according to Over the Cap:

18 mil cap hit
26.45 dead money

LMAO what an awful contract. McVay is going to be doing play by play after next season

New World Order 04-02-2023 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16887068)
Just looked it up according to Over the Cap:

18 mil cap hit
26.45 dead money

LMAO what an awful contract. McVay is going to be doing play by play after next season

Ewww

Bowser 04-02-2023 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16887068)
Just looked it up according to Over the Cap:

18 mil cap hit
26.45 dead money

LMAO what an awful contract. McVay is going to be doing play by play after next season

Haha, shiiiiit.

Give me OBJ or DHop all day every day over that mess.

Titty Meat 04-03-2023 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 16887123)
Haha, shiiiiit.

Give me OBJ or DHop all day every day over that mess.

I'm curious what Dhop gets unless it's a draft night trade which could happen that trade compensation has to go waaaay down after the draft. As for OBJ I don't see how any team commits to him for longer than 1 year.

Man it's such a shame the Rams won that 1 fluke title. They really are the definition of a poorly ran front office another example according to Over the Cap:

Stafford this year 20 mil cap hit & 111 mil cap. Next year 49.5 mil cap hit & 91.5 dead cap

This article goes into alot of detail about the awful deals they have:

https://theramswire.usatoday.com/lis...-2023-players/

TEX 04-03-2023 04:24 AM

This proposed trade is stupid. Its somening Denver would do, not KC.

Skyy God 04-03-2023 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 16886883)
Conditional 7th or wait for him to be released.

7th plus they eat 90% of his salary.

BryanBusby 04-03-2023 08:27 AM

Nope lmao

tredadda 04-03-2023 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Womble (Post 16886870)
Counter offer: Straight swap, Cooper Kupp for Clyde.

I like that a lot. Definitely a fair and balanced trade.

Gravedigger 04-03-2023 08:35 AM

I was really hoping that this was the end of the McVay era. The year before they brag about "**** them picks." Thinking Stafford is a world-beater, that OBJ was a difference maker, thinking that their model was the new best thing in sports. Then Aaron Donald is injured, contemplates retirement unless they pay him directly after the Super Bowl. They have to cut Wagner and trade Ramsey, McVay goes on a pouty retreat to wonder where it all went wrong, now for some reason he's coming back out of the shadows with significantly less talent and expecting people to believe he's a good coach again. Man we would've beaten the ever loving shit out of that team if we hadn't lost to Cincy, pisses me off still.

DJ's left nut 04-03-2023 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16886862)
Contract looks pretty good to me if we want a cheap bandaid. I believe LAR already paid his roster bonus. And they’ve paid out his signing bonus. So it’d be $10m this year and $16m next year. Which we can void if Robinson sucks this year or if we find a young replacement.

Eh - $10 million for a guy who's been hurt and/or ineffective the last 2 seasons (as he's entered his 30s) doesn't qualify as a 'cheap bandaid', IMO.

That's a desperation play. And with very little upside because you're not going to write that guy's $5 million roster bonus check next season so he's really just a 1 year deal at $10 million.

And he looked DONE last season after somehow looking as bad/worse the season before.

Nah - that's gonna need to be a deal where they bonus out that base salary over the remaining 4 years (2 void) on his deal to get that salary down near $5 million this season at worst. And is $5 million in cap savings worth a 6th round pick for the Rams? Probably not - ol' Les and his '**** dem picks' approach wouldn't seem to care that much about a 3rd day pick.

There have been a slew of better gambles to make in FA at lower costs and we haven't made them. This one seems very unlikely absent some additional maneuvering by the Rams.

DJ's left nut 04-03-2023 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 16887112)
Ewww

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 16887123)
Haha, shiiiiit.

Give me OBJ or DHop all day every day over that mess.

In fairness, no matter what LA does, they absorb a massive chunk of his cap hit. The roster bonus has already been paid so it's on their cap as is the pro-rated bonus.

As it stands, he'd come here with $10 million in cap charges and zero in dead money for 2024.

DenverChief 04-03-2023 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16887352)
In fairness, no matter what LA does, they absorb a massive chunk of his cap hit. The roster bonus has already been paid so it's on their cap as is the pro-rated bonus.

As it stands, he'd come here with $10 million in cap charges and zero in dead money for 2024.

You're not supposed to have conversations about things that aren't based in any true "rumor mill" fashion.

Just saying...

chiefzilla1501 04-03-2023 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16887349)
Eh - $10 million for a guy who's been hurt and/or ineffective the last 2 seasons (as he's entered his 30s) doesn't qualify as a 'cheap bandaid', IMO.

That's a desperation play. And with very little upside because you're not going to write that guy's $5 million roster bonus check next season so he's really just a 1 year deal at $10 million.

And he looked DONE last season after somehow looking as bad/worse the season before.

Nah - that's gonna need to be a deal where they bonus out that base salary over the remaining 4 years (2 void) on his deal to get that salary down near $5 million this season at worst. And is $5 million in cap savings worth a 6th round pick for the Rams? Probably not - ol' Les and his '**** dem picks' approach wouldn't seem to care that much about a 3rd day pick.

There have been a slew of better gambles to make in FA at lower costs and we haven't made them. This one seems very unlikely absent some additional maneuvering by the Rams.

Yeah it would depend on if he’s cooked. I didn’t see enough of him to know. I thought from the little I saw he’s got a little left but was used poorly. I am just saying if you think a guy like this has any gas left in the tank this kind of contract isn’t a bad one. If the goal is to aggresssively develop a WR1 or maybe hold out into true WR1s like aiyuk become available either way it seems like our best immediate solution is a bandaid.

And a 2-year deal worth $10m with a conditional second year ain’t too shabby. I thought the juju deal last year was a good one too. Where we tripped up (and I’m hoping I’m wrong) was not aggressively drafting a WR1. I just don’t think skyy has that ceiling. As long as the goal is to get rid of these bandaids sooner vs later, it’s not a bad strategy to overpay a little. Of course that completely depends on if the guy is too cooked to contribute anymore.

wazu 04-03-2023 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16887352)
In fairness, no matter what LA does, they absorb a massive chunk of his cap hit. The roster bonus has already been paid so it's on their cap as is the pro-rated bonus.

As it stands, he'd come here with $10 million in cap charges and zero in dead money for 2024.

Still way too much for a guy who looks completely washed. No thank you.

DenverChief 04-03-2023 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16887349)
Eh - $10 million for a guy who's been hurt and/or ineffective the last 2 seasons (as he's entered his 30s) doesn't qualify as a 'cheap bandaid', IMO.

That's a desperation play. And with very little upside because you're not going to write that guy's $5 million roster bonus check next season so he's really just a 1 year deal at $10 million.

And he looked DONE last season after somehow looking as bad/worse the season before.

Nah - that's gonna need to be a deal where they bonus out that base salary over the remaining 4 years (2 void) on his deal to get that salary down near $5 million this season at worst. And is $5 million in cap savings worth a 6th round pick for the Rams? Probably not - ol' Les and his '**** dem picks' approach wouldn't seem to care that much about a 3rd day pick.

There have been a slew of better gambles to make in FA at lower costs and we haven't made them. This one seems very unlikely absent some additional maneuvering by the Rams.


Is he 30 this year? I thought he just turned 29 - and was he "done" because the Rams were garbage or "done" as in Josh Gordon status?

DenverChief 04-03-2023 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 16887396)
Still way too much for a guy who looks completely washed. No thank you.

To be fair, their best WR (Kupp) only had ~800 yards receiving and 6 TDs - not exactly a good showing for their offense.

Total offensive output passing ~3500 yards 16 TDs

TwistedChief 04-03-2023 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16887402)
To be fair, their best WR (Kupp) only had ~800 yards receiving and 6 TDs - not exactly a good showing for their offense.

Total offensive output passing ~3500 yards 16 TDs

Robinson averaged 34yds per game receiving (annualized 578yds).

Kupp averaged 90yds per game receiving (annualized 1,530yds).

Kupp’s showing was fine - it was the injuries which dampened his stats. Robinson was just bad.

BryanBusby 04-03-2023 09:51 AM

If you paid attention to Allen Robinson running routes in LA, you could tell he's pretty much cooked.

Wouldn't take him even at a reduced salary. There's a reason to Rams are dire to let him go even after eating a recent bonus.

DenverChief 04-03-2023 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16887408)
Robinson averaged 34yds per game receiving (annualized 578yds).

Kupp averaged 90yds per game receiving (annualized 1,530yds).

Kupp’s showing was fine - it was the injuries which dampened his stats. Robinson was just bad.

Ahh - I missed that he only played in 9 games - Robinson only played in 10 too though.

Also - you have to factor in the poor OL play and the fact that Bryce Perkins, John Wolford and Baker Mayfield were slinging the ball around at some point during the season.

oldman 04-03-2023 09:54 AM

"While the 11 selections the Rams have are valuable, eight of those picks come after No. 150 overall. The team's three picks outside of those come on Day 2, and Los Angeles could use another one."

Sure, let's give up a #2 or 3 pick for a guy that had 339 yards last year. Makes sense --- if you're the Raiders.

wazu 04-03-2023 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16887408)
Robinson averaged 34yds per game receiving (annualized 578yds).

Kupp averaged 90yds per game receiving (annualized 1,530yds).

Kupp’s showing was fine - it was the injuries which dampened his stats. Robinson was just bad.

And Robinson didn't start being bad in 2022. In 2021 he was every bit as terrible, probably even worse. Only hope any observer had was that the QB situation was awful, and they were stuck with Matt Nagy as their coach, so Robinson lost all motivation to play. That was about as much optimism as could be sprinkled on Robinson's 2021 campaign. Then he went the Rams and eliminated other people as the cause of the problem.

DenverChief 04-03-2023 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 16887412)
If you paid attention to Allen Robinson running routes in LA, you could tell he's pretty much cooked.

Wouldn't take him even at a reduced salary. There's a reason to Rams are dire to let him go even after eating a recent bonus.

And I didn't watch any LA Rams games (other than ours) and he didn't play that game.

DenverChief 04-03-2023 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 16887418)
And Robinson didn't start being bad in 2022. In 2021 he was every bit as terrible, probably even worse. Only hope any observer had was that the QB situation was awful, and they were stuck with Matt Nagy as their coach, so Robinson lost all motivation to play. That was about as much optimism as could be sprinkled on Robinson's 2021 campaign. Then he went the Rams and eliminated other people as the cause of the problem.

Just to put things in perspective - the Rams (5-12) gave up 59 sacks last year to their QB's. The Broncos (5-12) Gave up 63 and the Colts (4-12) 60.

So some of that play can possibly be attributed to the poor play of the offense in genreal?

Bowser 04-03-2023 10:07 AM

I guess the Rams are going to answer the question of "how much would you be willing to give to win ONE championship in your lifetime", because their cap situation might be the most cap-hell ridden cap that's ever been stuck in cap hell.

Balto 04-03-2023 10:12 AM

So if Rams cut him they would be hit with a $26M dead money hit BUT if traded only a $11.2M Dead Money hit. So even a 2024 7th round pick would be a benefit to them AND could even be one of those trades that the Rams actually give pick value to take Robinson.

For the trading team
2023: $10M Cap hit because the $5.25 Roster bonus has already been paid.
2024: $15.750M Cap hit


I'd still be ok with getting Robinson just not at that price when I believe OBJ could be had for that money and produce much better.

DenverChief 04-03-2023 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16887398)
Is he 30 this year?

He is - 30 on 08/24

Gravedigger 04-03-2023 10:17 AM

It's a shame that his career was wasted in Chicago.

warpaint* 04-03-2023 10:24 AM

I'd take a flier as a FA on a prove-it deal. At most a 7r. He'd only be here a yr regardless of how it goes most likely.

DenverChief 04-03-2023 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16887408)
Robinson averaged 34yds per game receiving (annualized 578yds).

Kupp averaged 90yds per game receiving (annualized 1,530yds).

Kupp’s showing was fine - it was the injuries which dampened his stats. Robinson was just bad.

5 of the 10 games were well over the 34 YPG average:

W vs ATL (31-27) 4 Rec/5 Tgts, 53 Yds, 4 1stD, 1 TD
W vs CAR (24-10) 5 Rec/6 Tgts, 63 Yds, 5 1stD, 1 TD
L vs SF (14-31) 5 Rec/7 Tgts, 54 Yds, 3 1stD
L vs ARI (17-27) 4 Rec/6 Tgts, 44 Tds 3 1stD
L vs NO (20-27) 4 Rec/5 Tgts, 47 Yds, 4 1stD, 1 TD

The other games were blowouts or Defensive battles

L vs BUF (10-31) 1 Rec/2 Tgts, 12 yds
L vs SF (9-24) 2 Rec/6 Tgts, 7 Yds
L vs DAL (10-22) 3 Rec/5 Tgts, 12 yds
L vs TB (13-16) 3 Rec/5 Tgts, 24 yds, 3 1stD

The one outlier:

W vs ARI (20-12) 2 Rec/5 Tgts, 23 yds, 1stD

htismaqe 04-03-2023 10:56 AM

I'd take him if he's cheap. He's not DHop or OBJ but he's a decent WR. He could replace JJSS' production pretty easily in this offense.

BryanBusby 04-03-2023 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16887419)
And I didn't watch any LA Rams games (other than ours) and he didn't play that game.

He ran his routes like he had concrete in his shoes. He looks cooked.

TribalElder 04-03-2023 11:05 AM

dear media: quit speculating every old broke dick receiver to the Chiefs

notorious 04-03-2023 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16887408)
Robinson averaged 34yds per game receiving (annualized 578yds).

Kupp averaged 90yds per game receiving (annualized 1,530yds).

Kupp’s showing was fine - it was the injuries which dampened his stats. Robinson was just bad.

If we managed to get Cooper Kupp my balls would implode from orgasms.

Dude is a baller.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.