![]() |
Why don't receivers catch with their hands?
I see too many dropped passes by trying to catch it in their gut. Are they coached to do it that way.
To use a comparison, in basketball, it is all hands. I dunno. |
It works in Madden
|
Quote:
|
Lol there's a g spot in your asshole bundle of sticks
|
Might as well add...
Why do they jump when the ball is at chest level? |
The good ones do.
|
I know, it's so easy, right?
|
Would read again, thanks
|
Not exactly as easy as it looks.
|
I am freaking out man. This is like the Twilight Zone.
|
|
OK, simple question: hand v chest/stomach?
So not important as an observation? Seems like a logical question. |
Quote:
|
are you gay?
|
Catching with your hands isn't a natural reaction
|
Quote:
|
I did a detailed analysis of WR drops today. From year to year, the league-wide drop rate is 6.5%. In a given season, a simple model where every receiver has a 6.5% chance of dropping a given pass, accurately reproduces the league wide drop frequency distribution. The correlation between drop rates in 2022 and 2023 for a given receiver was only 0.2.
Stripping through all the math, no receiver in the NFL has better hands than another. The simplest representation is that all NFL receivers have a 6.5% chance of dropping any given pass. |
Quote:
|
Maybe it hurts their hands.
|
Quote:
Lol, now that's funny. |
Quote:
|
No they are taught to attack the point of the ball with their thumbs and pointer fingers making a diamond pattern. I low ball or over the shoulder are the exceptions. Sometimes they are late and don't get their hands in the correct and coached position.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Drop rate = drops/(drops+receptions) The denominator of that represents catchable balls. I then plotted the drop rate in 2021 vs the drop rate in 2022 of every receiver who caught at least 50 passes in both years. If some players had better hands than others, you'd expect them to have similar drop rates in both years and all the points to be scattered on a 45 degree line. Instead you get a scatter plot with a correlation coefficient of only 0.2. There is another analysis I did, but it is a little more complex. |
your mom catches with her mouth
|
Quote:
|
Wow, they got math for everything...
|
Quote:
|
3 points of contact/control vs 2…just spitballin here..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:thumb: "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Mark Twain |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.