A Draftmas gift for Mahomes
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DciHqbX7udE" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Looks like a good replacement for DAT / Wilson. Don’t know much about him, or where he’s slot, as I’d rank WR as 5th on my draft wishlist without knowing what we do in FA
|
How about a ball hawking CB to replace the one we just traded away for a moldy bag of dicks?
|
We need that Punter from Texas
|
Quote:
|
chill guys - redick
|
let's see his 40 time in a few days - also - was that supposed to be rap in the HL video?
|
Quote:
|
Could be an optical illusion but his speed seems NFL average.
|
Quote:
:harumph: |
Quote:
|
The only position on Offense that we need to upgrade in this off season is LG. Everything else needs to go on the Defense.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Another Tech receiver, Dylan Cantrell, could be a steal in the draft, 6-3, 225, 4.4. 40. |
A new DC?
|
Quote:
2nd - Edge Rusher 3rd (a) - NT/DE 3rd (b) - NT/DE 4th - CB 5th - ILB 7th - RB (someone for ST) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://thesource.com/wp-content/uplo...kable_feat.jpg |
What's it called when you dick somebody a second time?
|
I really want Tim Settle, please?
|
Coutee is interesting to me- he plays the slot receiver position which I believe is a need for the Chiefs and has played with Mahomes before. I'm not sure how well Coutee will transition to the NFL though as I see him as a better athlete than most of the guys in the NCAA and doesn't win necessarily by having outstanding routes.
When I look at the Chiefs offense I want my slot receiver to be a guy who understands coverages well, can make catches in traffic, and runs terrific routes (Jarvis Landry is a good example of the player type I'm after- not at his price tag though) . I'm not opposed to Coutee but I don't think he is the best fit. I think this offense has enough explosive players, I want a guy who is relied upon to move the sticks. For those interested Coutee's draft comparison is John Brown. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Personally, if I were a GM, my philosophy would be to sign offensive players via free agency and draft almost exclusively defense, offensive line, and late round RB.
My theory is that offensive players are skill players, and skills can be developed over time. Also, the QB makes average WR look great (cough cough Albert Wilson). Defense being so reliant on speed and athleticism, I'd rather get my young players there in the draft, rather than sign the Josh Normans of the world, who might excel in a scheme but not translate across the board. Additionally, so much of defensive success is based on uncontrollable variables, given its reactive nature. A CB who isn't thrown at doesn't get interceptions. An ILB with a shitty DL can't make tackles, etc. It's harder to gauge in FA, I feel like. Also, I feel like Belichick has used this method for years. Populate your skill positions with inexpensive guys who can execute a scheme and draft defensive players. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.