ChiefsPlanet
Page 59 of 62 « First 94955565758 59 606162
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The Chiefs are taking Geno #1; bank on it (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270750)

B14ckmon 03-12-2013 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9490540)
Never gonna happen. Geno is absolutely going #1. Just not to the Chiefs.
No one is trading with you guy. You are taking your LT.

They will trade with the Jaguars to move up.

saphojunkie 03-12-2013 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9490560)
No one is trading with you guy. You are taking your LT.

They will trade with the Jaguars to move up.
No one is trading up to #2 when they know that #1 is up for sale. Whoopty shit, you just gave up two firsts and a third! For... star lotuleilei at #2. Because someone else gave up two firsts and a third for Geno Smith at #1.

Why do you ****ing idiots insist on thinking that teams trade with the team that wants to draft their guy? They trade with the team AHEAD of that team. And no one trades to #2 when #1 is for sale.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-12-2013 06:34 PM
Welp, at this point, I hope he somehow ends up with Coach T. Make it rain, football gods.
Posted via Mobile Device

B14ckmon 03-12-2013 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9490569)
No one is trading up to #2 when they know that #1 is up for sale. Whoopty shit, you just gave up two firsts and a third! For... star lotuleilei at #2. Because someone else gave up two firsts and a third for Geno Smith at #1.

Why do you ****ing idiots insist on thinking that teams trade with the team that wants to draft their guy? They trade with the team AHEAD of that team. And no one trades to #2 when #1 is for sale.
The only way they would trade up to #1, is if it cost less than the #2 offer. Why would they need to trade up to #1 to get a guy that isn't being taken by anyone in the top 6?

You are ****ing stupid lol

saphojunkie 03-12-2013 06:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9490641)
The only way they would trade up to #1, is if it cost less than the #2 offer. Why would they need to trade up to #1 to get a guy that isn't being taken by anyone in the top 6?

You are ****ing stupid lol
:facepalm:

Mr_Tomahawk 03-13-2013 11:40 AM
Emory Hunt‏@FBallGameplan

A part of me doesn't feel like Geno Smith gets past #2 w/ Jags, so it wouldn't surprise me to see the Bills try to get that #1 pick from KC

B14ckmon 03-13-2013 11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9493083)
Emory Hunt‏@FBallGameplan

A part of me doesn't feel like Geno Smith gets past #2 w/ Jags, so it wouldn't surprise me to see the Bills try to get that #1 pick from KC
The biggest hiccup with that, is Reid/Dorsey have to have someone they want that they know can fall to them at #8. Because if they really want Fisher or Joeckel, is isn't happening at #8.

Buckweath 03-13-2013 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9493113)
The biggest hiccup with that, is Reid/Dorsey have to have someone they want that they know can fall to them at #8. Because if they really want Fisher or Joeckel, is isn't happening at #8.
Lol, Im pretty sure they would love to trade down to #8 or even lower if the value is there in the trade.

B14ckmon 03-13-2013 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 9493138)
Lol, Im pretty sure they would love to trade down to #8 or even lower if the value is there in the trade.
Big IF. We have 0 indication that the Bills are even looking to trade up for Geno. For all we know they should be looking to trade up in the second round for Nassib, or get a QB in FA.

Alot of the assumptions here are just Chief fans saying what they WANT to have happen.

FlaChief58 03-13-2013 11:50 AM
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>A part of me doesn't feel like Geno Smith gets past #2 w/ Jags, so it wouldn't surprise me to see the Bills try to get that #1 pick from KC</p>&mdash; Emory Hunt (@FBallGameplan) <a href="https://twitter.com/FBallGameplan/status/311892233089601536">March 13, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Cannibal 03-13-2013 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flachief58 (Post 9493167)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>A part of me doesn't feel like Geno Smith gets past #2 w/ Jags, so it wouldn't surprise me to see the Bills try to get that #1 pick from KC</p>&mdash; Emory Hunt (@FBallGameplan) <a href="https://twitter.com/FBallGameplan/status/311892233089601536">March 13, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Damn, that would be sweet.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9493083)
Emory Hunt‏@FBallGameplan

A part of me doesn't feel like Geno Smith gets past #2 w/ Jags, so it wouldn't surprise me to see the Bills try to get that #1 pick from KC
I said this last night

Cannibal 03-13-2013 11:52 AM
With the Bills dumping Fitz, it's as if they already have a deal worked out.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9493182)
With the Bills dumping Fitz, it's as if they already have a deal worked out.
Buddy Nix HAD to dump Fitzgerald after being punked on national radio earlier this week.

Cannibal 03-13-2013 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9493190)
Buddy Nix HAD to dump Fitzgerald after being punked on national radio earlier this week.
Haven't heard about that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 PM.
Page 59 of 62 « First 94955565758 59 606162
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.