Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8590891)

Of course, that's NOT AT ALL what I said.

Arguing AGAINST Gannon <> arguing FOR Grbac.

For someone who throws 4-year old temper tantrums about people being "intellectually dishonest" you shouldn't be so quick to put words in people's mouth.

You are the biggest ****ing baby on this board, bar none.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8591714)

They were winning with Grbac too. Everybody only remembers the last game.

Nobody remembers that, with Grbac at the helm, the team was arguably the BEST TEAM IN FOOTBALL the first half of that season.

That team had one of the best defenses ever fielded in KC as far as takeaways, a defense that manufactured points as good as any in the history of football.

To argue that Gannon could have won that playoff game if he had played in place of Grbac is 100% revisionist history.

Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe (Post 8605342)

Matt Cassel sucks

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8594457)

"I've seen teams change QB and it's been a disaster"


Yup Scott Pioli deserves credit.

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8614119)

Pioli gets a franchise quarterback in the 5th round and people still bitch.
:evil:

Originally Posted by Worthless n00b (Post 8614126)

Start the fool. Please. Shat Crapple makes my bowels ache.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8591714)

They were winning with Grbac too. Everybody only remembers the last game.

Nobody remembers that, with Grbac at the helm, the team was arguably the BEST TEAM IN FOOTBALL the first half of that season.

That team had one of the best defenses ever fielded in KC as far as takeaways, a defense that manufactured points as good as any in the history of football.

To argue that Gannon could have won that playoff game if he had played in place of Grbac is 100% revisionist history.