Quote:
|
I'm sure he's also fitting in well with the city of Baltimore.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bengals. He feasts off shit QB's and good QB's feast on him.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I'm sure harbaugh and Martindale who run primarily zone coverages traded for him and started him on their defense just for shits and giggles. |
Quote:
Then you, you know, put words in my mouth. I didn't say he sucks at EITHER. He's not ideal for press coverage (man or zone, he's not a cover 2 corner either because he won't tackle) but is good in off coverage (zone or man) at reading the play and breaking on the ball by watching the triangle. YOU implied he can't play man coverage in a thread about a pick 6 he got while playing man coverage. Don't move the ****ing goal posts. If you don't understand what I'm talking about just ask me to explain further. The world isn't binary "he's awesome or he totally sucks". Peters has very specific strengths and weaknesses. |
He tends to fit in well anywhere for a year or two, and then his personality wears out the welcome.
|
Quote:
Peters is a player who does very well in zone coverage and is much better at it. The fact that that one play is in man doesn't change anything. No team runs 100% man or 100% zone. At the end of the day, what Peters does isn't a fluke or accident. I'll take him getting burnt all day if it came with the turnovers he forces. The thing that I couldn't put up with was his lack of effort when it came to tackling. But in pass defense, I have no problem with how he plays. |
As predicted, shitty QB throws the ball straight to Peters and some dipshit starts a thread about how great Peters is.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Are they shitty human beings? Perhaps. Don’t care. I want talented players, not choir boys. Clark Hunt and Andy should be Forced to watch highlights of these guys every day for the next 5 years. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.