keg in kc |
01-06-2010 07:32 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
(Post 6416572)
No, it's a pretty clear statement.
You can't treat football like it's alchemy. It's been proven over and over again.
|
You hire the best guys for the job. Period.
What you're suggesting is that they shouldn't hire a guy, regardless of how successful he's been at his job, because they've worked with him before, because they have a track record. Which is your perogative. But, again, I say you hire the best guy for the job. They've apparently decided that's Crennel. Decided that a year ago, probably.
If your only criteria for hiring a guy is "he can't have worked with NE, or Arizona, or Parcells, or whoever", then I fail to see how that's realistically any different than hiring a guy because he has. You're not looking at his merit as an individual candidate.
|