What's the lovefest with Fisher?
 

Lotta people on here saying no to Romeo and want Fisher. Why Fisher? What is so great about him? Wouldn't he just be more of the same? What has he done that makes you want him as a HC so much? Doesn't he have a losing record against the Chiefs? If so doesn't that mean he couldn't put together a better team than we had in the past? So what's the big sell for him as opposed to Romeo or someone else?

I'd rather Billick if we hire a retread coach.

This hasn't been discussed to death.

Chiefsfan 50/50 will be along shortly to enlighten us all.

Well feel free to discuss again....

Why would you want someone worse than Fisher? Because Billick won a SB because of the historically good Ravens D and not because of his offense?

And when the endless Fisher to KC threads pop up I like to point out the the Stache is an overrated piece of crap.

Personally I would like Gruden. Anyone who can win under Al Davis has to be able to have some sway with the front office!!!! :p

Proven winner.

Or, if we can pry Andy Reid away from Philly I would go for that as well. But if if comes down to Fisher or Romeo I am not sure Fisher is the better choice. But I'd like to hear why others think he would be?

Winner of what?

Except for 40 years of history that says head coaches don't win SBs with 2 teams, he's fine. :rolleyes:

142 ****ing NFL games

"What's the lovefest with Fisher"

1 miracle SB appearance and 4 division titles in 16 years = getting your balls washed by CP's dumb shits.

He coached 16 years? That's not even 9 wins a season.