Charles vs. Priest
 

Been wondering who CP thinks is the better back

Jamaal Charles

1401 rushes, 7556 yards, 44 tds, 5.4 ypc

Priest Holmes

1780 rushes, 8172 yards, 86 tds, 4.6 ypc

My choice is JC. If you put Jamaal with the offense that Priest had he would probably have broken several records and would be a HoFer. That's not saying I don't love Priest, but Jamaal was out of this world.

Jamaal, and its not even close.

Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk

What are their receiving stats?

I've said it before and took massive heat for it, but if you put JC on that O, it is disgusting.

Jamaal Charles

JC does some very bad things behind that line. Priest was good, but JC had to do with it shitty QBs and poor o-line play.

Jamaal. Priest was great, but he was also running behind the best OL guys the Chiefs ever had. Jamaal was running behind dogshit most of the time.

Strictly running, Charles was better. Priest was much more of a weapon as a receiver, but he had a more competent QB. Also Charles seemed to fumble quite a bit more. It's a tough call. Although in a two year stretch, LJ may be better than both

Charles was the best we ever had but you always held your breath he was going to fumble.

Priest was never a Bronco 😀

:spock:

Charles' best year was under Reid while he was catching passes.

LJ was close, but JC wouldn't need to hit anyone. They wouldn't be close enough to hit.

For me it was tense every carry after the knee injuries.

Doesn't change who they were.

Mods, reverse my vote!

Something needs to be said about Priest's patience - that's a huge bonus - JC was slightly more prone to coughing up the rock. Plus to me - Priest was funner to watch. JMO