ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs TJ was better than Charles in Cleveland. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233987)

SenselessChiefsFan 09-23-2010 09:36 AM

TJ was better than Charles in Cleveland.
 
I know this will catch some grief, but the reality is that other than the 20 yard run against a defense expecting a pass at the end of the first half, JC averaged less than 3 yards a carry and broke no runs of longer than 10 yards.

Charles got the ball on 3-1 at the Cleveland six at 9:31 to go in the third quarter. At that point, TJ had one more carry than Charles. One.

Charles took a two yard loss. At that point, the Chiefs started going to TJ more and more down the stretch.

I won't blame that solely on Charles, it was a combination of blocking, defense, etc.

But, clearly, the match up versus Cleveland favored Thomas Jones. It was evident in nearly every carry other than the one that JC got at the end of the half.

And, if you take out the last for TJ carries, when the Browns new that the Chiefs were going to run the ball to ice the game. If you take out those for carries, TJ averaged over 4 yards a carry in the Cleveland game.

When you really break it down, I think you might actually see what the coaches see.

I will also note that if you take the 56 yard run out of the San Diego game, TJ and JC have the same yards per carry. JC is a tremendous playmaker, but he isn't the workhorse that TJ is and TJ rarely takes a loss. TJ is always falling forward.

JC actually had one more carry than TJ in the San Diego game, but it was called back on a penalty.

Even with all this said, I think JC needs to get on the field more. However, this isn't fantasy football, you have to look at more than just the box score to understand why guys are in the game during certain situations.

Mr. Arrowhead 09-23-2010 09:37 AM

BTW Cassel sucks

CaliforniaChief 09-23-2010 09:38 AM

http://3alleypub.files.wordpress.com...orse.jpg?w=450

ToxSocks 09-23-2010 09:39 AM

Oh ****...

loochy 09-23-2010 09:39 AM

Too many new Jamaal Charles related threads. Head...exploding....ARAGAHHHH!

Reaper16 09-23-2010 09:40 AM

And until someone gives me a convincing rebuttal to my assertion that IF Charles was less effective than TJ than it was only because the way that Charles was used made him so (in that the opposing defense sold out on the run on every Charles down because 1.) they know that Charles is the Chiefs' most explosive player, and 2.) since Charles was sparingly used, it meant that when he finally did see play that the ball would likely be going to him because no one expects a team to not use its best offensive threat) I will not agree with any post that comes close to suggesting that TJ is/was better.

booyaf2 09-23-2010 09:41 AM

The game was in KC, not Cleveland. Get your facts straight.

keg in kc 09-23-2010 09:42 AM

Bill Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman.

Coogs 09-23-2010 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 7030285)
I know this will catch some grief, but the reality is that other than the 20 yard run against a defense expecting a pass at the end of the first half, JC averaged less than 3 yards a carry and broke no runs of longer than 10 yards.

Charles got the ball on 3-1 at the Cleveland six at 9:31 to go in the third quarter. At that point, TJ had one more carry than Charles. One.

Charles took a two yard loss. At that point, the Chiefs started going to TJ more and more down the stretch.

I won't blame that solely on Charles, it was a combination of blocking, defense, etc.

But, clearly, the match up versus Cleveland favored Thomas Jones. It was evident in nearly every carry other than the one that JC got at the end of the half.

And, if you take out the last for TJ carries, when the Browns new that the Chiefs were going to run the ball to ice the game. If you take out those for carries, TJ averaged over 4 yards a carry in the Cleveland game.

When you really break it down, I think you might actually see what the coaches see.

I will also note that if you take the 56 yard run out of the San Diego game, TJ and JC have the same yards per carry. JC is a tremendous playmaker, but he isn't the workhorse that TJ is and TJ rarely takes a loss. TJ is always falling forward.

JC actually had one more carry than TJ in the San Diego game, but it was called back on a penalty.

Even with all this said, I think JC needs to get on the field more. However, this isn't fantasy football, you have to look at more than just the box score to understand why guys are in the game during certain situations.

It has been beat to death, but with an offense that is struggling to score points, that 56 yard TD could come and any point in time. And it could come more than once per game.

CaliforniaChief 09-23-2010 09:44 AM

And I thought ChiefsPlanet would become more bearable when the season started and wondered what it would be like if we won some games.

ChiefsPlanet's burst has been greatly exaggerated.

the Talking Can 09-23-2010 09:44 AM

everyone knows Jones is better than Charles...



it's ok, we'll draft a better backup next year

-King- 09-23-2010 09:44 AM

WHAT THE ****? DID YOU SERIOUSLY MAKE ANOTHER TOPIC? WTF?


Do you not see the 15 other JC threads?

bevischief 09-23-2010 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 7030291)

Please quit it.

Reerun_KC 09-23-2010 09:47 AM

man not again!

Art Vader 09-23-2010 09:48 AM

W!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.