Quote:
We'll never know what could've been if teams doubled up on Dorsey and left JA singled, or visa-versa..... A suitable replacement for JA is dire need IMO. |
I think we're okay at DT. Boone will play there sometimes, but Dorsey, Edwards and Tank are a decent DT tandem. Throw in Boone and we're alright for a couple more years until either Boone or Edwards breaks down.
It's the edges where we're in trouble. Hali isn't a #1 guy, and we desperately need a #1 guy. We may not even have a #3 guy, and Johnston has a season to show if he's that guy. Turk can fit in there somewhere, I imagine. But who knows. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
JA's a hard act to follow, but if we can make opposing teams believe that someone other than Hali can "get there" we'll be so much more effective Defensively. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No one seems all that interested in locking that job down thus far. |
Quote:
Who's the 'Roaf' who's been available since then? |
Quote:
We can't undersell the importance of a serviceable DE on the other side of Hali though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's called foresight, that prevents you from trying to find a "Roaf" when "Roaf" retires. Start developing 2-3 seasons prior to the retirements, and don't piss off and send away your younger guns like John Tait. |
The real problem was our failures at identifying Defensive Line talent.
That's what cost this O-Line. We invested far too many picks in the D-Line and gave only low-round commitments to Offensive Line prospects. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.