ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Daniel Jeremiah: Many expect Chiefs to trade up for a CB (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=314951)

Shag 04-16-2018 02:54 PM

Daniel Jeremiah: Many expect Chiefs to trade up for a CB
 
Not real surprising, but from here: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...oking-to-trade

Quote:

Chiefs are a candidate to trade up for a CB: The Chiefs don't own a first-round pick in this year's draft (they dealt that pick away in the Patrick Mahomes trade last year), but I won't be surprised if they move up from where they're picking in the second round (No. 54 overall). They have a glaring need at cornerback and the top cover men will be long gone by the time they are on the clock if they stay put at No. 54. They need to get into the range of picks 35-40 in order to secure a Day One starter at that position, and many around the league expect them to make that happen.

ThaVirus 04-16-2018 03:09 PM

Trade who? What?

Baby Lee 04-16-2018 03:11 PM

Two years wasted trying to talk sense into a knucklehead, and here we are.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-16-2018 03:18 PM

So we're not trading up for a TE. Kinda disappoint

Buckweath 04-16-2018 03:28 PM

I have always thought, especially ever since Veach made that comment about trading up, that it is just a question a having a CB he really likes fall a bit and having the opportunity to trade up.

Veach definitly needs to pick up a top CB from this draft, after having traded Peters.

JakeF 04-16-2018 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 13519432)
Trade who? What?

They are talking about trading up from the bottom to the top of the 2nd round. They don't usually trade a player to do that. Their second pick in the 3rd round would probably be enough, maybe throw in a 6th.

Tribal Warfare 04-16-2018 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 13519432)
Trade who? What?

Justin Houston, reports from Paylor were that Peters and he were close friends and Justin had a problem with how his trade was dealt.

It goes along with the "right attitude" Veach has been citing.

Buckweath 04-16-2018 03:37 PM

I just don't see how Veach doesn't somehow trades this year the 2019 2nd round pick acquired from the Rams.

sedated 04-16-2018 03:39 PM

Aren't we trading into the top 10 to pick a LG?

Dante84 04-16-2018 03:45 PM

If it's one thing I know, its that every report that comes out the two weeks prior to the draft is definitely factual.

Simply Red 04-16-2018 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 13519467)
Aren't we trading into the top 10 to pick a LG?

i hope so

CoMoChief 04-16-2018 03:50 PM

CB and DL are the 2 biggest immediate needs right now. However...

I think they're going to trade up into the beginning of 2nd rd and select OG Will Hernandez. Fisher, Hernandez, Morse, LDT, Schwartz would be a fine OL wk1...assuming Morse's bitchass can stay healthy.

I think right now, the Chiefs main goal is to protect Mahomes and give him ALL of the weapons and protection he needs for him to immediately successful, because the Chiefs need him to be.

scho63 04-16-2018 03:56 PM

Before we trade up for a CB or TE, I think it's about time we trade up for better Cheerleaders! We got dogs!

I saw we swap 10 of ours for 1-2 of the Cowboys or Dolphins with their first round pick.

CoMoChief 04-16-2018 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 13519484)
Before we trade up for a CB or TE, I think it's about time we trade up for better Cheerleaders! We got dogs!

I saw we swap 10 of ours for 1-2 of the Cowboys or Dolphins with their first round pick.

or Rams or Chargers....I'm sure LA can churn out some good pussy.

Clyde Frog 04-16-2018 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 13519467)
Aren't we trading into the top 10 to pick a LG?

http://i.imgur.com/sktnWBc.gif

Kiimo 04-16-2018 04:01 PM

I would actually love that.

O.city 04-16-2018 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13519458)
Justin Houston, reports from Paylor were that Peters and he were close friends and Justin had a problem with how his trade was dealt.

It goes along with the "right attitude" Veach has been citing.

This was just as dumb the first time you said it as it is now

CoMoChief 04-16-2018 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clyde Frog (Post 13519488)

ROFL

That gif....

Seriously the "stereotypical midwestern hillbillies" vibe in those 2 *edit* 3..is literally off the charts ROFL. And people wonder why it's called Camarohead.

Jesus. this will never get old I hysterically lose my shit everytime I see it. ROFL

You know they arrived in a rusted out El Camino. No ****ing way they didn't drive in anything else and if so, I refuse to believe/accept it as truth.

Eleazar 04-16-2018 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13519458)
Justin Houston, reports from Paylor were that Peters and he were close friends and Justin had a problem with how his trade was dealt.

It goes along with the "right attitude" Veach has been citing.

If some other team wants to try to swim with Houston's millstone of a contract tied around their neck, they are welcome to take him on and try.

Luke Atamadong 04-16-2018 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 13519510)
ROFL

That gif....

Seriously the "stereotypical midwestern hillbillies" vibe in those 2 *edit* 3..is literally off the charts ROFL. .

And that's the Fisher pick right?

Clyde Frog 04-16-2018 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 13519510)
ROFL

That gif....

Seriously the "stereotypical midwestern hillbillies" vibe in those 2 *edit* 3..is literally off the charts ROFL. And people wonder why it's called Camarohead.

Jesus. this will never get old I hysterically lose my shit everytime I see it. ROFL

You know they arrived in a rusted out El Camino. No ****ing way they didn't drive in anything else and if so, I refuse to believe/accept it as truth.

You forgot the 18 pack of crushed Busch Light cans that fall out when they birth out the doors. "Why not Coors light?", you ask. Cuz F**k Colorado, thats why.

Bewbies 04-16-2018 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luke Atamadong (Post 13519552)
And that's the Fisher pick right?

The only draft picks that get Chiefs fans out of their seats are o-lineman drafted way higher than they should be.

Hoover 04-16-2018 05:04 PM

A few thoughts.

1. We are not one CB away from fielding a competent denfense, if we were by all means push the chips into the center of the table and go all in.

2. Yeah we need a starting CB, but we also need a ton of youth on the defensive side of the football. Having 5 of the first 125 picks could go a long way in providing this team with the defensive depth it needs.

3. Its not 2018 or bust. If you add solid defensive players (lets say our send and two third rounders) on defense, then next year you can add a playmaker since we will have a 1st and two second round picks.

4. Frankly hitting on picks #54, #78 & #86 would be > going all in on pick #32 IMO.

Let Veach do his work. There is no reason to do something stupid and go all in on a player drafted at the end of the first round.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-16-2018 05:14 PM

I'd give our 2019 1st rounder and this years 3rd, 4th 6th and 7th for Nelson.

That dude is legit at a spot we're weak in

Chief Roundup 04-16-2018 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 13519570)
A few thoughts.

1. We are not one CB away from fielding a competent denfense, if we were by all means push the chips into the center of the table and go all in.

2. Yeah we need a starting CB, but we also need a ton of youth on the defensive side of the football. Having 5 of the first 125 picks could go a long way in providing this team with the defensive depth it needs.

3. Its not 2018 or bust. If you add solid defensive players (lets say our send and two third rounders) on defense, then next year you can add a playmaker since we will have a 1st and two second round picks.

4. Frankly hitting on picks #54, #78 & #86 would be > going all in on pick #32 IMO.

Let Veach do his work. There is no reason to do something stupid and go all in on a player drafted at the end of the first round.

This

MTG#10 04-16-2018 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 13519586)
I'd give our 2019 1st rounder and this years 3rd, 4th 6th and 7th for Nelson.

That dude is legit at a spot we're weak in

Jesus ****ing Christ you're a ****ing moron.

I mean just...wow.

:facepalm:

Sassy Squatch 04-16-2018 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 13519586)
I'd give our 2019 1st rounder and this years 3rd, 4th 6th and 7th for Nelson.

That dude is legit at a spot we're weak in

Or we could just draft an interior lineman in the 5th or 6th. Reid seems to know what he's doing with OLinemen.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-16-2018 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13519621)
Or we could just draft an interior lineman in the 5th or 6th. Reid seems to know what he's doing with OLinemen.


we don't have a 5th so you suck.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-16-2018 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTG#10 (Post 13519618)
Jesus ****ing Christ you're a ****ing moron.

I mean just...wow.

:facepalm:

It's the 32nd pick dumbass. Good value for a top 5 player. ****ing moron!

RunKC 04-16-2018 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 13519570)
A few thoughts.

1. We are not one CB away from fielding a competent denfense, if we were by all means push the chips into the center of the table and go all in.

2. Yeah we need a starting CB, but we also need a ton of youth on the defensive side of the football. Having 5 of the first 125 picks could go a long way in providing this team with the defensive depth it needs.

3. Its not 2018 or bust. If you add solid defensive players (lets say our send and two third rounders) on defense, then next year you can add a playmaker since we will have a 1st and two second round picks.

4. Frankly hitting on picks #54, #78 & #86 would be > going all in on pick #32 IMO.

Let Veach do his work. There is no reason to do something stupid and go all in on a player drafted at the end of the first round.

What if I told you we could trade a 2019 2nd to move from 54 to either 35 (Dorsey) or 37 (Ballard) while keeping our picks this year?

Tribal Warfare 04-16-2018 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13519496)
This was just as dumb the first time you said it as it is now

I'm still saying it till disproven

Kiimo 04-16-2018 06:07 PM

Not sure where else to put this....



Chad Forbes
‏ @NFLDraftBites

Multiple Folks saying #Bills #Giants #Browns working on 3 Team Trade... Browns would slide to 2nd, Bills would land 1st Overall & Giants would slide to 4th or 12th. Heard it from few people.... Browns would be monetizing taking Josh Allen... Remember, it's silly season...

staylor26 04-16-2018 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13519678)
I'm still saying it till disproven

Houston’s so upset he showed up to workouts this offseason when he didn’t last year.

BryanBusby 04-16-2018 06:09 PM

If the Browns are stupid enough to take Josh Allen, they might as well go for a trade like that.

Tribal Warfare 04-16-2018 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13519681)
Houston’s so upset he showed up to workouts this offseason when he didn’t last year.

Till we know how Veach runs the draft, the point still stands

The Bad Guy 04-16-2018 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13519458)
Justin Houston, reports from Paylor were that Peters and he were close friends and Justin had a problem with how his trade was dealt.

It goes along with the "right attitude" Veach has been citing.

When did he say this?

Houston so mad that he showed up for day 1?

The Bad Guy 04-16-2018 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13519684)
Till we know how Veach runs the draft, the point still stands

What point? That you're reaching with a garbage opinion again? You think Justin Houston and a massive contract have any trade value?

Al Bundy 04-16-2018 06:12 PM

The Buccaneers will be open for business trying to recoup that 3rd round pick they gave away to the Giants for 1 year of average DE play.

UChieffyBugger 04-16-2018 06:14 PM

There are a plethora of decent CB's in this class so I see no reason why we should trade up tbh.

Ward= will be gone
Joshua Jackson= will be gone
Alexander= will be gone
Oliver= could be gone
Donte Jackson= could be gone
Hughes= could be gone

After that we could easily find ourselves being able to get Davis, Mcfadden, Averett, Hill etc. So I wouldn't feel inclined to trade away a 3rd or next years second round pick just to go up a few places.

SAUTO 04-16-2018 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13519644)
What if I told you we could trade a 2019 2nd to move from 54 to either 35 (Dorsey) or 37 (Ballard) while keeping our picks this year?

Why would they do that? They lose a year and most likely spots in the round.

SAUTO 04-16-2018 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 13519680)
Not sure where else to put this....



Chad Forbes
‏ @NFLDraftBites

Multiple Folks saying #Bills #Giants #Browns working on 3 Team Trade... Browns would slide to 2nd, Bills would land 1st Overall & Giants would slide to 4th or 12th. Heard it from few people.... Browns would be monetizing taking Josh Allen... Remember, it's silly season...

How would giants get the 4th?

Browns move both their firsts?

pugsnotdrugs19 04-16-2018 06:21 PM

I expect it would be for Oliver or Davis.

Priest31kc 04-16-2018 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13519702)
I expect it would be for Oliver or Davis.

Mike Hughes? Or you think he'll be gone by the 35-40 range?

Hughes is the CB I want

Chiefs=Champions 04-16-2018 06:24 PM

Id laugh so hard if Dorsey was able to get another team to move ahead of him for a qb he doesn't want. I genuinely dont understand the Allen hype, and cant understand Dorsey wanting him after the other qbs he's had a hand in drafting and been around. Would be a great move by the browns.

RunKC 04-16-2018 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 13519698)
Why would they do that? They lose a year and most likely spots in the round.

Bc they both have multiple early 2nd rd picks. Browns have 33/35 and Colts have 36/37.

Dorsey just loves picks and Ballard has an enormous rebuild to do.

You don’t think either team would like to pick early in rd 2, move down to 54 with their second 2nd rd pick, stay in rd 2 and get 2nd rd pick next season?

RunKC 04-16-2018 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13519702)
I expect it would be for Oliver or Davis.

Don’t forget Jaire Alexander

SAUTO 04-16-2018 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13519712)
Bc they both have multiple early 2nd rd picks. Browns have 33/35 and Colts have 36/37.

Dorsey just loves picks and Ballard has an enormous rebuild to do.

You don’t think either team would like to pick early in rd 2, move down to 54 with their second 2nd rd pick, stay in rd 2 and get 2nd rd pick next season?

You said keep all our picks this year didn't you?

never mind im a dumbass

pugsnotdrugs19 04-16-2018 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13519719)
Don’t forget Jaire Alexander

I’ve been seeing him in the top 20 of all the mocks lately

pugsnotdrugs19 04-16-2018 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Priest31kc (Post 13519706)
Mike Hughes? Or you think he'll be gone by the 35-40 range?

Hughes is the CB I want

I think he goes late 1st round

O.city 04-16-2018 06:46 PM

Hughes or Davis I’d think

Priest31kc 04-16-2018 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13519732)
I think he goes late 1st round

I could see that, damnit. I want him. But I'd be good with Davis or Oliver. I like Davis a little better.

Fuller-Davis/Oliver-Nelson-Amerson would be a solid Top 4 CBs. Especially if Nelson can stay healthy and return to 2016 form. I don't expect 2015 Amerson but hopefully he's serviceable.

Shoes 04-17-2018 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13519719)
Don’t forget Jaire Alexander

Jaire is the cornerback I've been pulling for all off season- seems like he is getting a bit of a boost lately in all of the mock drafts I've looked at. Could be the 2nd CB off the board after Denzel Ward, ahead of Joshua Jackson which is somewhat surprising.

If Jaire slips though I would love for Veach to make a move.

Al Bundy 04-17-2018 08:21 AM

Mike Hughes/Jaire Alexander aren't making it past the Buccaneers 2nd round pick.

carcosa 04-17-2018 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 13519473)
i hope so

Me to, thalks

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 04-17-2018 09:22 AM

Giving up assets to replace a player we had on the cheap. Clown franchise.

staylor26 04-17-2018 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy tossed tigger's salad (Post 13520164)
Giving up assets to replace a player we had on the cheap. Clown franchise.

Clown poster

Bewbies 04-17-2018 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy tossed tigger's salad (Post 13520164)
Giving up assets to replace a player we had on the cheap. Clown franchise.

Durr hurr hurr.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-17-2018 10:27 AM

Well, it is silly to give up the lone decent pick the team got for him to move up and grab a lesser player replacement with the only decent pick in this draft.

Simply Red 04-17-2018 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 13519634)
we don't have a 5th so you suck.


Not a very nice post bud.

Jethopper 04-17-2018 11:55 AM

We drafted a QB in the first. Who cares what happens for the next 5 drafts

Simply Red 04-17-2018 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jethopper (Post 13520400)
We drafted a QB in the first. Who cares what happens for the next 5 drafts

i do - I also bet the farm we move up - possibly even into the first.

carcosa 04-17-2018 12:24 PM

Didn't Daniel Jeremih do that song "Borthday Sex"

JoeyChuckles 04-17-2018 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 13520435)
Didn't Daniel Jeremih do that song "Borthday Sex"

He was also a bullfrog by my understanding.

CHENZ A! 04-17-2018 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy tossed tigger's salad (Post 13520164)
Giving up assets to replace a player we had on the cheap. Clown franchise.

Truth hurts.

Pitt Gorilla 04-17-2018 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13520186)
Clown poster

He's right, though. We gave up a young, lockdown corner on his rookie deal for fairly little. How much will we have to give up to replace his production? One would hope it isn't too much, but I doubt that's the case.

BossChief 04-17-2018 12:51 PM

1) Veach has a twinkle in his eye when he said the chiefs might end up in the first round

2) using the pick from Peters and a third would probably get us into the early to mid second. That’s high enough to get a good CB.

BossChief 04-17-2018 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13520470)
He's right, though. We gave up a young, lockdown corner on his rookie deal for fairly little. How much will we have to give up to replace his production? One would hope it isn't too much, but I doubt that's the case.

I hated the trade and still do, but we aren’t privy to the information they used to make such a tough decision.

I’ll always think that was a bad move. Having a CB that takes the ball away when we have a QB like Mahomes would have been very advantageous.

BryanBusby 04-17-2018 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13520478)
1) Veach has a twinkle in his eye when he said the chiefs might end up in the first round

2) using the pick from Peters and a third would probably get us into the early to mid second. That’s high enough to get a good CB.

That would be idiotic as ****, so something we're capable of doing.

ct 04-17-2018 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 13519602)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 13519570)
A few thoughts.

1. We are not one CB away from fielding a competent denfense, if we were by all means push the chips into the center of the table and go all in.

2. Yeah we need a starting CB, but we also need a ton of youth on the defensive side of the football. Having 5 of the first 125 picks could go a long way in providing this team with the defensive depth it needs.

3. Its not 2018 or bust. If you add solid defensive players (lets say our send and two third rounders) on defense, then next year you can add a playmaker since we will have a 1st and two second round picks.

4. Frankly hitting on picks #54, #78 & #86 would be > going all in on pick #32 IMO.

Let Veach do his work. There is no reason to do something stupid and go all in on a player drafted at the end of the first round.


This

and this AGAIN

BossChief 04-17-2018 01:33 PM

This team is going to score tons of points.

Tons. Probably top 5 scoring offense.

The team has 1 corner signed for 2019...and that’s the last year of his rookie deal.

This draft is stacked with CBs. 7 or 8 with first round grades.

Veach traded, tried to trade or let every single corner from last year walk.

Connect the dots here...we’re drafting 3 corners and 2 of them need to be able to not only start in a year, but play at a high level because our defense is going to be in dime a lot due to teams trying to keep up with the scoring.

I’m betting on them using next years second from the Peters trade and a third to move up to get one and then moving up again using our second and another pick this year or next to select another corner.

And I think that’s smart.

BryanBusby 04-17-2018 01:42 PM

Yeah, that's not going to happen.

TomBarndtsTwin 04-17-2018 01:43 PM

While I don't necessarily agree with them trading Peters, I get why they did it.

But if they turn around and package multiple(3 or more) picks to trade up into the first round to draft said replacement CB, well then that's just ****ing stupid. Hell, I'd rather see them draft 3 DB's with 3 different picks in hopes of 'hitting' on at least one . . . .

staylor26 04-17-2018 01:48 PM

What’s wrong with going up and getting a CB?

If we add a guy like Hughes, Davis, Oliver, or Alexander this could easily be the best CB group we’ve had under Reid.

BryanBusby 04-17-2018 01:50 PM

Going from 8 to 7 picks than spending nearly 50% of your draft capital on a single position is absurd. Veach should be fired out of a cannon, directly into the ****ing sun if he does that.

They don't have a starting caliber FS, a cum dumpster situation at LG, a hole at slot WR and shitty TE LB and DL depth. No way would dropping half of the draft for corners make.any ****ing sense.

staylor26 04-17-2018 01:54 PM

I definitely wouldn’t want to give up too much though.

I think we can get one if we trade up 10-12 spots. That shouldn’t cost too much.

JakeF 04-17-2018 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jethopper (Post 13520400)
We drafted a QB in the first. Who cares what happens for the next 5 drafts

I imagine that Patrick Mahomes cares who we draft the next 5 drafts. He would rather not go out there with a shit team around him. KC fans shouldn't want to do to Mahomes what the Colts did to Andrew Luck either.

BryanBusby 04-17-2018 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13520571)
I definitely wouldn’t want to give up too much though.

I think we can get one if we trade up 10-12 spots. That shouldn’t cost too much.

I don't think giving up 54+86+196 to the Redskins for 44+109 would be bad to secure a corner.

Wrecking nearly all the gains from the Alex and Peters trades to get a 1st round pick for a corner would be stupid though.

BossChief 04-17-2018 02:00 PM

It’s all about value.

Let’s say it gets to the end of the first and Mike Hughes/Josh Jackson/Isiah Oliver are on the board and we can get one by trading with Philly by using a third this year and a second next year.

If it weren’t for the depth at the position, those guys are usually going in the top 15-20 picks of most drafts. Moving a 2 and 3 to get one is good value.

If one of the other corners is still on the board from 37-44, we can move up from 54 and get another CB that we can have on a cheap rookie deal instead of having to spend in FA for one (corners are very expensive in FA)...

If we can come out of the draft with 2 first round talent CBs, and spend 2 second rounders, a third and fourth...that’s gonna go a long way towards making this defense what we need it to be...effective in sub packages that allows Sutton to turn the pass rushers loose.

BryanBusby 04-17-2018 02:09 PM

LMAO if you think Philly would even consider that trade

Try more like a 3rd and the Chiefs 2019 first, as the floor.

BossChief 04-17-2018 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13520578)
I don't think giving up 54+86+196 to the Redskins for 44+109 would be bad to secure a corner.

Wrecking nearly all the gains from the Alex and Peters trades to get a 1st round pick for a corner would be stupid though.

After 2018, we only have 1 corner signed for 2019.

1

This draft is an opportunity to fortify a premium position at a huge discount


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.