That really irked me also.

How? I still don't understand people having a problem with the destruction. These are two of the most powerful things in the known universe fighting. Of course there will be A LOT of destruction. And how exactly would Superman get Zod to a less populated area? Ask him? Go there and hope Zod follows him? Zod would just stay in metropolis and continue killing people.
Posted via Mobile Device

everything is your opinion but number 6.. they just avoided death and it was a moment of appreciation for each other.. pretty sure they cleaned up after

<iframe width="655" height="368" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/F6cpTjsHTNk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This is exactly the problem. What's supposed to set Kal El apart from Zod and the rest of the Kryptonians still alive is his upbringing and in this version, Pa Kent is (largely) a cowardly piece of shit so I guess it's no wonder why he hardcore executes Zod on his knees.. :harumph:

Apparently people who attended theater trailer screenings tonight saw 5 seconds of footage of Batman and Superman charging each other. Also they got a voucher for a free ticket to see bvssuperman 1 week early and a poster

LMAO exactly! I've never understood that argument.

-Superman: "Zod, I care about these people, let's settle this in that field over there."

- Zod: "Oh, my bad! Meet you there in 5?"

This looks bad ass IMO, seems like they're taking him more into the dark comic books than Nolans version... this Batman is bigger, darker, and meaner.

Affleck is going to pleasantly surprise a lot people I bet.

I'm skeptical of anything Ben does in which he does not direct himself. He has a substantial history of crap when he's directed by others. Gone Girl was very good, but Zack Snyder's no David Fincher.

I bet he'll be fine as long as the script is good, this definitely wont be a rental for me, it has a chance to be really awesome.

We'll probably see it in the theater, too. Just saying I'm skeptical, especially of Ben.

This.

Supes is almost an unwinnable character. He was written as part Boy Scout, part Jesus. If you portray him that way, people hate it. If you give him a darker edge, people hate it. If you show him developing his personality (MoS), people hate it. What the **** do people want, really? Honestly, "MoS" and "Smallville" are the more realistic idea of what it would be like. Think about it: you, yourself, grow up pretty well, and suddenly find out you have the powers of a god. Would it really be that easy to suddenly become a do-gooding hero? Dedicate your life to just helping people? Purge yourself of any thoughts of using your powers for selfishness, greed, lust? Take your anger just a little too far? I think the superhuman "nature vs. nurture" discussion was done pretty well with the unheralded film "Chronicle" that came out a while back. That's all these modern directors are doing: exploring HOW Kent makes his choices and becomes Supes.

Good post. XRay vision would DEFINITELY be used to look at tits.

Superman's Xray vision is a goddamn farce. There's no ability to perceive color, as color is part of the visual optical spectrum. There's no way that Xrays emitted from Superman's eyes could return back to his eyes. There's no way for the Xrays to distinguish between matter that should be transparently seen through, and matter that should be seen. It's ****ing bullshit! :cuss:

He could use his laser eyes, then, to just zap away clothing.