ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Evaluate the Defense Game #1 (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=324958)

petegz28 09-08-2019 03:24 PM

Evaluate the Defense Game #1
 
I thought they looked improved from several aspects. Keep in mind this was Jax and not a high-powered offense.

Tackling = Much, MUCH better

Coverage = Tighter. Few plays without a defender right on the WR

Run Defense = Stellar start, let's not get cocky

Pass Defense = Not a ton of pressure today. Missed a huge sack which ended up leading to a TD. Coverage overall was decent. Made a backup look all-world but that happens when a backup comes in mid-game.

Overall it looked like we were more sound fundamentally. Run gaps were getting filled, screens were getting blown up and not a ton of YAC. Hopefully as the season progresses our defense will as well.

Overall grade today: C+

Bump 09-08-2019 03:24 PM

Frank Clark has more picks than Jalen Ramsey!

Discuss Thrower 09-08-2019 03:24 PM

Not terrible, not great.

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-08-2019 03:28 PM

Patriots will destroy our defense

JohnnyHammersticks 09-08-2019 03:29 PM

The price of PP just went up.

Dante84 09-08-2019 03:30 PM

Fingertips away from a pick 6 with that tip

smithandrew051 09-08-2019 03:30 PM

Run defense and tackling were much improved.

Lots of blown assignments in coverage. Time will tell is Spags can fix those issues.

Rain Man 09-08-2019 03:30 PM

Initial reactions:

DL = good run stopping, no pass rush.
LB = seemed okay in short areas, decent against run
DB = forest fire

Hammock Parties 09-08-2019 03:31 PM

B-

Run defense was much improved other than one drive, where they got gashed in nickel.

Jags hit some passes, but they were holding a lot, especially Jones.

We'll be fine.

Bowser 09-08-2019 03:31 PM

I think they played pretty vanilla against their backup, to be honest.

New World Order 09-08-2019 03:32 PM

Thought Clark would dominate today.

Didn't look that great against a rookie backup.

Hammock Parties 09-08-2019 03:32 PM

When the game was in the balance, when it was 23-13, they made the plays to bring home the W in conjunction with the offense responding to those stops with scores.

That's the standard I always judged Sutton on.

They keep that up and we'll be a hard team to deal with.

KChiefs1 09-08-2019 03:33 PM

Evaluate the Defense Game #1
 
C-

Sassy Squatch 09-08-2019 03:34 PM

DBs ****ing sucked, Ward in particular.

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-08-2019 03:35 PM

Surprised Honey Badger was invisible.

PHOG 09-08-2019 03:36 PM

C-

bricks 09-08-2019 03:36 PM

There was communication today. Something we didn’t see a lot of last year.

pugsnotdrugs19 09-08-2019 03:36 PM

It was very meh. Good and bad.

But truthfully, we aren’t going to know what we have until week 8 or later.

kcclone 09-08-2019 03:36 PM

Better against the run.

Better secondary tackling.

I'm glad we still have more CB help on the way.

I think Thornhill will be really good by mid-year.

Our pass rush will be fine.

The Foles TD (where he got hurt) was a really great play by the Jags. Good coverage, can't fault anyone for that.

I suspect we'll see more blitzes as our secondary starts to gel.

threebag 09-08-2019 03:36 PM

C

MAHOMO 4 LIFE! 09-08-2019 03:36 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I owe <a href="https://twitter.com/tkelce?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tkelce</a> lunch or something for that ������ <a href="https://t.co/m1Gwh8Nzmk">https://t.co/m1Gwh8Nzmk</a></p>&mdash; Patrick Mahomes II (@PatrickMahomes) <a href="https://twitter.com/PatrickMahomes/status/1170810540534448128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Chieftain 09-08-2019 03:37 PM

Cornerback position is still crap. Fuller got beat constantly. I would feel a lot better when Claiborne returns from his suspension.
Damien Wilson was a stud out there. Very impressed by his game. Frank Clark was decent. Honey Badger had an average game and so did Thornhill imo.
Our run defense seems definitely more improved and we tackle a whole lot better when compared to last year. The pass rush seems to have regressed a little. Overall I notice a slight improvement. Still too early to tell.

ThaVirus 09-08-2019 03:38 PM

They looked like shit. The pass rush is nonexistent, coverage outside of Fuller was nowhere to be found, and the run defense wasn't even all that great.

Matthieu was legitimately invisible. Didn't hear his name called a once.

My gut tells me it won't get any better, but it's a long season. We'll see.

Pitt Gorilla 09-08-2019 03:38 PM

They got the ball back for the offense when it mattered. Mission accomplished.

Hammock Parties 09-08-2019 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 14434033)
Surprised Honey Badger was invisible.

Honey B is probably the reason there was only one long ass burner TD.

mnchiefsguy 09-08-2019 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14434026)
When the game was in the balance, when it was 23-13, they made the plays to bring home the W in conjunction with the offense responding to those stops with scores.

That's the standard I always judged Sutton on.

They keep that up and we'll be a hard team to deal with.

This. I was over reacting in the chat to be sure, but looking back, when Jax was in the game in the 3rd qtr and things could have went to shit, the defense did what we have wanted them to do...they got the one or two stops needed that allowed the offense to score a couple of TD's and put the game away.

I am dissappointed in the two 4th qtr garbage time TD's, but there is hope for this defense. I keep reminding myself it is gonna take a few weeks for this defense to develop its chemistry and gel.

tmax63 09-08-2019 03:39 PM

Got a game's worth of experience and a win. A lot of folks here have been saying they will improve as the season goes on and they work together more. Well, this was a full game of practice and 1 step closer to what they'll look like later on.
+1 on tackling - they looked much improved
+1 on stopping the run. Kept them under 100 yds for the game. Only remember a couple of runs over 5yds, most were 3-4 yds and not big gashes.

Buckweath 09-08-2019 03:39 PM

Not good enough.

Run defense was strong.

Passrush was OK.

Coverage was not a disaster but not good.

Ward was a liability.

I was definitly expecting more of Clark and Mathieu but it is just one game.

If Veach adds a good CB, I trust this D to be competent.

wazu 09-08-2019 03:40 PM

I thought for a new scheme and coordinator it looked pretty damn good. Late in the game, when things were pretty much over, we had allowed 13 points, and only 1 really broken play. Saw us "almost" make a lot of great plays in 1st half, including blowing up screen passes. I have some hope this could work.

bricks 09-08-2019 03:41 PM

Defense not playing all that great could be a road thing?

Last year we saw plenty of that but at home it was a different story.

That pattern may repeat itself?

Three7s 09-08-2019 03:43 PM

Defense was a lot like how it was preseason. Good run defense, bad pass defense for the most part. I'll reserve further judgement until Claiborne gets going.

Cosmos 09-08-2019 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 14434060)
Not good enough.

This, if you want to win a ring...

New World Order 09-08-2019 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14434031)
DBs ****ing sucked, Ward in particular.

Claiborne needs to play ahead of Ward when he returns.

ROYC75 09-08-2019 03:46 PM

They have a long ways to go to jell into a top 15 defense.

Buckweath 09-08-2019 03:47 PM

I must say, regardless of the Chiefs D, that Jags QB was playing damn well.

Foles wouldnt have been any better. Maybe worse.

PHOG 09-08-2019 03:47 PM

Number 35 needs cut tomorrow. Other than that, things look promising. Not good, but promising.

BlackHelicopters 09-08-2019 03:50 PM

D+. Cashew shredded us. 22/25? Embarrassing.

CrazyPhuD 09-08-2019 03:51 PM

Even after the overhaul our best defensive player is still Patrick Mahomes.

mnchiefsguy 09-08-2019 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 14434090)
They have a long ways to go to jell into a top 15 defense.

Just have to get to 20...especially in points allowed.

They were 24th in points allowed last year.

KChiefs1 09-08-2019 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14434044)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I owe <a href="https://twitter.com/tkelce?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tkelce</a> lunch or something for that ������ <a href="https://t.co/m1Gwh8Nzmk">https://t.co/m1Gwh8Nzmk</a></p>— Patrick Mahomes II (@PatrickMahomes) <a href="https://twitter.com/PatrickMahomes/status/1170810540534448128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Being too cute.

keg in kc 09-08-2019 03:54 PM

Didn't see the fourth quarter, obviously, so I can't really evaluate what happened with the garbage time scores, and that's half the points allowed in the game...

As I mentioned in the gameday thread, however, the scheme today looked a lot like preseason game number 5 to me. While there were some blitzes, I really didn't see a whole lot of creativity or much of an aggressive philosophy. And I do expect this to be an attacking defense.

So my guess is that they saw the offensive line injuries that Jacksonville had, decided they could win the game without having to be very exotic, and just played a relatively vanilla defense from the outset. And once we got ahead very quickly, there wasn't really a need to change that approach. Jacksonville was done before halftime.

So while it wasn't all that exciting to watch, I think they effectively kept the scheme off of film for another week, which may be beneficial moving forward. And it wouldn't surprise me to see it happen again in Oakland.

That said, I think they do look to be much improved against the run, I thought that both the linebacker play and the play of Thornhill was encouraging, but it does look like we're going to have to get creative to generate a pass rush, which I don't think surprises anyone. Although Jacksonville's approach did seem to be 'get the ball out as quickly as possible,' and maybe some slower-developing playcalls from the Jaguars would have resulted in more pressure.

All in all, not great, but it's a start. As the players themselves said, they need to tighten some things up, and they know they don't need to be giving up 26 points.

MIAdragon 09-08-2019 03:57 PM

Pretty shitty, going against backups on the oline we got garbage for pressure. We let a no name scrub carve up the secondary. Smells like it always has.

RunKC 09-08-2019 04:02 PM

I think the Fuller TD was just a damn good play. That’s just gonna happen sometimes.

Was definitely the best throw from the QB’s.

Ward is transitioning to a coverage defense after playing man n Dallas and under Sutton.

We definitely need Claiborne.

Side note: Thornhill was really good today

RunKC 09-08-2019 04:03 PM

Oh and we still suck on 3rd down. Unbelievable that we gave up 3rd and 18 today. That is completely unacceptable

dlphg9 09-08-2019 04:21 PM

****ing Chark and Conley both had damn good games.

Chark 4 rec 146yds 1 TD

Conley 6 rec 97 yds 1 TD

I'm not sure what some of you saw from the run D that makes you think they're improved, because Fournette (who may be the most overrated RB in football) had 13 rushes for 66 yards and averaged 5.1 ypc. The only reason he didn't have alot more is because they had to play catch up and their rookie QB did his best Alex Smith impression and completed 22 of 25 for 2 TDs. From what I was able to watch our pass rush looked like it wanted to replicate last year's AFCCG. Luckily one of the only times the D got to the QB they knocked the starter out of the game or else they would have allowed a lot more points.

WhiteWhale 09-08-2019 04:32 PM

They suck.

They gave up 428 yards to a bad offense who was using their BACK UP QB.

You guys need to come to grips with this. The defense is not going to be good. It's like watching you guys convince yourselves Matt Cassel doesn't REALLY suck.

Inspector 09-08-2019 04:35 PM

Jax O was able to move down the field way too easily. Need lots more QB pressure. Need a Derrick Thomas / Neil Smith sack team.

I miss that D.

Hammock Parties 09-08-2019 04:38 PM

Key stat:

JAX rushing 1st downs: THREE

Phenomenal.

duncan_idaho 09-08-2019 04:40 PM

I don’t expect this defense to be GOOD, but I saw improvement in the run game at least.

Fournette’s overall numbers look good, but the Chiefs were much more sound tackling and filling run gaps.

They did a much better job at the LoS to my eye. Weren’t getting put on skates as much as we saw last year.

They’ve sacrificed some pass rush to make that happen, but that’s OK.

The Chiefs D needs to be more capable against the run - preventing teams from using the game plans we saw from the Chargers and Ravens last year - and crest some turnovers. I like the early signs in those areas.

Bump 09-08-2019 04:43 PM

If the defense is bad statistically during the season and gives up yards but then in the playoffs they go lights out like that one Giants year when they upset the undefeated Patriots in the Superbowl, I'll be ok with that.

TwistedChief 09-08-2019 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 14434064)
I thought for a new scheme and coordinator it looked pretty damn good. Late in the game, when things were pretty much over, we had allowed 13 points, and only 1 really broken play. Saw us "almost" make a lot of great plays in 1st half, including blowing up screen passes. I have some hope this could work.

Yup. This is entirely where I'm at.

We're not going to have a 'good' defense. But we tackled better and were in better position than under Sutton. I'll absolutely take it given that I expect them to improve and get better over the course of the season.

TLO 09-08-2019 04:44 PM

They did a good enough job for us to win the game.

That's all that really matters.

Lprechaun 09-08-2019 04:45 PM

1st game as a unit, give Jags line some credit. Once the secondary gels a little we will be where we need to be.

big nasty kcnut 09-08-2019 04:47 PM

The last few scores were the chiefs trying to not get injured. Otherwise our d is better.

dlphg9 09-08-2019 04:48 PM

We paid Frank Clark $100 mil to have 1 tackle and an int. It's only 1 game and I don't expect him to suck, but if he does then that's really bad.

Sassy Squatch 09-08-2019 04:49 PM

Some Miami players are pissed off and want out. Inquire about Howard and let's get serious with this shit.

TEX 09-08-2019 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by big nasty kcnut (Post 14434328)
The last few scores were the chiefs trying to not get injured. Otherwise our d is better.

Yep.

Hammock Parties 09-08-2019 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 14434333)
We paid Frank Clark $100 mil to have 1 tackle and an int. It's only 1 game and I don't expect him to suck, but if he does then that's really bad.

IF ONLY he could play like Vonnie Holliday and get 3 sacks in his first game as a Chief

Chiefs4TheWin 09-08-2019 04:57 PM

Besides how they line up, no change from last year. Still bad enough to cost us a game.

crayzkirk 09-08-2019 04:59 PM

Pass rush seems to be a concern. I believe the referees allowed Jacksonville to hold to make the game competitive. Especially when Clark was being held and was called for tripping to offset the penalties. That's garbage.

TwistedChief 09-08-2019 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 14434242)
****ing Chark and Conley both had damn good games.

Chark 4 rec 146yds 1 TD

Conley 6 rec 97 yds 1 TD

I'm not sure what some of you saw from the run D that makes you think they're improved, because Fournette (who may be the most overrated RB in football) had 13 rushes for 66 yards and averaged 5.1 ypc. The only reason he didn't have alot more is because they had to play catch up and their rookie QB did his best Alex Smith impression and completed 22 of 25 for 2 TDs. From what I was able to watch our pass rush looked like it wanted to replicate last year's AFCCG. Luckily one of the only times the D got to the QB they knocked the starter out of the game or else they would have allowed a lot more points.

I saw a team that won comfortably. I'm responding to a guy that thought a Shady McCoy lotto ticket was too much of a gamble.

Fournette the most overrated RB in football?! I thought that was McCoy! It's so hard to keep up with your histrionics.

Hammock Parties 09-08-2019 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14434392)
I saw a team that won comfortably.

Winning on the road in the NFL is hard.

Every ****ing fan base would take a 14-point win and not complain.

stumppy 09-08-2019 05:11 PM

I agree pete, solid C+, a sack away from a B-.

NWTF 09-08-2019 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 14434276)
They suck.

They gave up 428 yards to a bad offense who was using their BACK UP QB.

You guys need to come to grips with this. The defense is not going to be good. It's like watching you guys convince yourselves Matt Cassel doesn't REALLY suck.

Pretty much.

The way I see it is the offensive power of this team outweighs its subpar defense and they will win a lot more games then they lose. Of course come playoff time things get a little dicier.

If i was to put a silly but honest raking on both units on where I think they will be at the end of the season Id say.

offense # 1
defense # 20-24 but thats a lot better than #31

King_Chief_Fan 09-08-2019 05:17 PM

Lack of pass rush, no pressure on Qb.
Allowing back up to Qb carve it up
Didn't do too bad against the run.

C-
not good enough come playoff time.

scho63 09-08-2019 06:18 PM

The ONLY improvement I saw was the tackling and run defense until about the 3rd quarter.

Pass rush blew
Thornhill rookie
Ward slow as molasses
Honey Badger more like an Ostrich or Prairie Dog today
A 1970's porn star QB who no one ever heard of outside a few bars in Jacksonville made our defense look pathetic.

Sannyasi 09-08-2019 06:22 PM

F. They made some shit backup look like a stud. If Minshew actually ends up being a great QB then this grade can be changed but for now I'm not giving them any credit for this game. You shouldn't let some team's backup tear your ass up like that.

RunKC 09-08-2019 06:24 PM

Yeah if this is our defense all year, we aren’t making it to Miami.

Easy 6 09-08-2019 06:25 PM

40 - 26 win, that’s a good enough debut

Coogs 09-08-2019 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14434748)
Yeah if this is our defense all year, we aren’t making it to Miami.

37-13 middle of the 4th. :shrug:

mlyonsd 09-08-2019 06:33 PM

They're better than last year. Especially tackling.

IA_Chiefs_fan 09-08-2019 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 14433992)
Not terrible, not great.

Which is all we need.

Marcellus 09-08-2019 06:35 PM

Moderately better, knowing they should improve as they adjust to the new scheme they did alright but not as good as I "hoped".

Definitely more bright spots but some of the same frustrations if that makes sense.

J Diddy 09-08-2019 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14434806)
Moderately better, knowing they should improve as they adjust to the new scheme they did alright but not as good as I "hoped".

Definitely more bright spots but some of the same frustrations if that makes sense.

With our line,against 2 inexperienced tackles, there is no excuse for captain grocery bagger to move up and down the field at will.


I'm just hoping it's growing pains and not the sign of things to come.

TEX 09-08-2019 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 14434795)
They're better than last year. Especially tackling.

And against the run.

Marcellus 09-08-2019 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 14434855)
With our line,against 2 inexperienced tackles, there is no excuse for captain grocery bagger to move up and down the field at will.


I'm just hoping it's growing pains and not the sign of things to come.

Totally agree.

FloridaMan88 09-08-2019 08:40 PM

F minus times 100.

Jacksonville started two tackles with zero NFL experience before today and had to go with a 6th round rookie QB for most of the game (who proceeded to complete his first 13 pass attempts against Spags shit defense).

kysirsoze 09-08-2019 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 14434064)
I thought for a new scheme and coordinator it looked pretty damn good. Late in the game, when things were pretty much over, we had allowed 13 points, and only 1 really broken play. Saw us "almost" make a lot of great plays in 1st half, including blowing up screen passes. I have some hope this could work.

Definitely this. I expect growing pains in the first half of the season. This was a good starting point and much more respectable than last season. If they don't improve week to week, then of course we're in trouble.

dlphg9 09-08-2019 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14434392)
I saw a team that won comfortably. I'm responding to a guy that thought a Shady McCoy lotto ticket was too much of a gamble.

Fournette the most overrated RB in football?! I thought that was McCoy! It's so hard to keep up with your histrionics.

Never said it was a gamble, just thought it was dumb to sign him when we had capable backs already on the roster. People talk about Fournette as if he's some elite back, but he can't stay healthy and only averaged 3.9 ypc in 2017 and 3.3 ypc last year. I never said McCoy was the most overrated back in football. I don't know why you are getting so offended over a person's opinion. You must be one insecure mother****er. To make up lies too. Shame shame. This thread has nothing to do with McCoy, so why you bringing him up? Cuz you're a ****ing reerun or are you some girl that holds grudges and can't get over things?

Simply Red 09-08-2019 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14434370)
IF ONLY he could play like Vonnie Holliday and get 3 sacks in his first game as a Chief

now there's a name I haven't heard in a while


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.