50 Shades of Ginger.

They will give him a burial at sea.

He's hiding out at the NAACP fox hole.

LOL then again we could make the offensive comment and ask if they checked the woodpile? But that's probably still too hot with all the wood burning!

(pardon me while I punch my ticket to hell now)

How in the holy **** have they not said something one way or the other by now?!?!

It is either A) Truly to hot still for them to check it out

B) He escaped

C) There was a hostage in there that died as well.

I'm thinking A but I'm almost hoping it's B just to **** with the media.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8MahIsr3gpU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I'm kinda rooting for him, not sure why lol

this guy is totally Rambo

The entire cabin burned to ashes. It's hot. And they're not going to just tromp through their evidence. Unless he has a twin bother, 99% sure what's left of him is in there.

I bet by the evening news tomorrow they will have a much clearer picture. So far they've reported anything and everything some of which was obviously false. Why freak out when they've stopped their verbal diarrhea and are finally taking their time to get it right.

That's great. It's also probably bullshit.

A soft-jacketed bullet isn't going to spark at all and the spark from a FMJ round isn't going to be hot enough to ignite the fuel (and you'd have to hit the tank at just the right angle to make a spark at all). Moroever, the gas would have to be at exactly the right fuel/air mixture to actually ignite.

There are ways you can rig it to make it blow...and you can title a YouTube video about damn near anything you want. But in the end you just have to kinda turn your brain on here and think about it.

There isn't a catalyst. There isn't going to be an explosion.

EDIT: This isn't dispositive on it's own, but it's a hell of a lot more dispositive than a 14 second clip of a guy shooting something at something and making fire.

<iframe id="dit-video-embed" width="640" height="360" src="http://static.discoverymedia.com/videos/components/hsw/33060-title/snag-it-player.html?auto=no" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>

you shouldn't be so trusting of the media.

Yeah, I'm not buying the propane tank idea either. Would be 1 in a million. One of the main factors in gases burning is getting the right gas to air ratio as well as getting that perfect ignition.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/iiSz9v78l2E?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I'm not putting my trust in the media. I'm putting in the guys that surrounded the cabin. Yeah yeah, the police there don't know shit, the LAPD shot at innocent people therefore all law enforcement in SoCal don't know what they're doing.

Yeah, that's where Mythbusters was trying to show that the stunt from Casino Royale wouldn't work in real life. That you aren't going to shoot the pistol that Bond used and pierce through a propane tank. A high powered rifle round will though. A full tank will blow out enough propane to flood a room when pierced. I have no idea where the tank was within the structure, or how full it was, or if the guy was even telling the truth when he said that there was one in there. But if the tank was in there, and it was reasonably full, it could have been pierced by weapons that were on scene. There are a number of ways that the resultant cloud of propane could have been ignited at that point. If you "turn your brain on and think about it" as you suggested, it's silly to just assume that the authorities torched Dorner based on one comment made by a passing cop.