Chiefspants |
05-20-2021 12:49 PM |
As to why our farm should be looked at with more of a mid 2010's optimism than a mid 2000's mirage.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How absurd is this? Royals pitchers from 2018 MLB Draft:<br><br>Brady Singer (MLB): 3.96 ERA<br>Kris Bubic (MLB): 0.96 ERA<br>Jackson Kowar (Triple A): 1.15 ERA<br>Jonathan Bowlan (Double A): 1.65 ERA<br>Jon Heasley (Double A): 1.93 ERA<br>Josh Dye (Double A): 1.13 ERA<br>Zach Haake (High A): 1.69 ERA</p>— Alec Lewis (@alec_lewis) <a href="https://twitter.com/alec_lewis/status/1395443259309281281?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
To be fair, we need a higher percentage of our young talent to "hit", than the 2010's pipeline. The understated thing about our farm system of a century was how many busts we had (basically all of our stud pitching - Monty, Lamb, Dwyer & Arguelles). Duffy was literally the biggest pitching success story we had from that time. Our system was so deep then that it didn't matter how many busts we had or that none of our bats became MVP caliber players (Cain is an exception, but he emerged a bit later than the 2011 class I’m thinking of and also got there from his D).. That depth allowed us to trade even our flame-outs (Lamb and Monty) to give our young talent on offense the extra pieces they need for a World Series.
Admittedly, our current system isn't as deep and can't afford that high of a bust percentage. We'd also be hugely benefitted by finally developing a star player on offense (Looking at you, Witt and Mondesi) But, if we're more fortunate with our pitching prospects this time around (and our pitching prospects now have more potential than ours from the Mid-2010's), we can easily become a force and be in contention again.
|