ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Survey of Draft Websites: Chiefs will pick... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200088)

KCJohnny 01-11-2009 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 5378392)
Pretty much.

Yeah, you're right. Who needs TDs?

aturnis 01-11-2009 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5378391)
Wow you're dense.

ha!

Nightfyre 01-11-2009 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 5378397)
Yeah, you're right. Who needs TDs?

PPG: Chiefs - 18.2; Falcons - 24.4; Ravens - 24.1
TDs: Thigpen - 18; Ryan - 14; Flacco -14

Funny - TDs by the QB don't correlate to team scoring.

Mecca 01-11-2009 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 5378406)
PPG: Chiefs - 18.2; Falcons - 24.4; Ravens - 24.1
TDs: Thigpen - 18; Ryan - 14; Flacco -14

Funny - TDs by the QB don't correlate to team scoring.

This is Johnny the guy who tried to use the garbage time stats the Chiefs put up in the Buffalo blowout as an example of the offense improving.

beach tribe 01-11-2009 01:40 AM

So KC Johnny wants to keep Herm, as the coach, and Thigpen as the starter.


Thigpen will be the starter for a few games until our QBOTF is ready to play.

KCJohnny 01-11-2009 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 5378406)
PPG: Chiefs - 18.2; Falcons - 24.4; Ravens - 24.1
TDs: Thigpen - 18; Ryan - 14; Flacco -14

Funny - TDs by the QB don't correlate to team scoring.

Thigpen had 4 additional TDs rushing/receiving. And the Chiefs averaged 21.6 ppg in games started by Thigpen who came off the ebnch. Flacco and Ryan were starters in camp from day one and got all the reps. thigpen got garbage time or scout team reps and had to immediately step in and play.

Tribal Warfare 01-11-2009 01:40 AM

This also concerning drafting strategy if KC believes Albert is cemented at LT, and Sanchez/Stafford isn't there. I'm kind of expecting them making the team trading up sell there soul which would mean next years 1st round pick and another day 1 pick if they just totally fell in love with a specific player.if they won't do that pick the BPA even if it's an LT and move Albert to RT. I rather do that then allow a team to believe we need to trade down to fill a need because then you'd get the bad end of the deal because of the undercutting.

KCJohnny 01-11-2009 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5378433)
So KC Johnny wants to keep Herm, as the coach, and Thigpen as the starter.


Thigpen will be the starter for a few games until our QBOTF is ready to play.

What I said was that Edwards deserves another year as he had just one to rebuild. And its hard IMHO to justify picking a QB in the draft when you have the NFL's worst _efense.

Rigodan 01-11-2009 01:49 AM

Hey Mecca, just curious who you would take if everyone relevant but Sanchez declared and Stafford and Mays were off the board. What do you do then? Do you settle for Bradford?

I know Mays likely won't be gone but I am skeptical the chiefs would take him there. I could definately live with Mays though.

RealSNR 01-11-2009 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rigodan (Post 5378454)
Hey Mecca, just curious who you would take if everyone relevant but Sanchez declared and Stafford and Mays were off the board. What do you do then? Do you settle for Bradford?

I know Mays likely won't be gone but I am skeptical the chiefs would take him there. I could definately live with Mays though.

Rams likely want Andre Smith. I think either Stafford OR Mays will be there at #3. Or both, in which case we take Stafford.

Basileus777 01-11-2009 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5378484)
Rams likely want Andre Smith. I think either Stafford OR Mays will be there at #3. Or both, in which case we take Stafford.

Taking a safety at 3? I hope we aren't that ****ing stupid.

I wouldn't mind trading down and taking Mays, but at 3 he is horrible value.

crazycoffey 01-11-2009 02:09 AM

mocks are fun!!!!


all look to be good players at this level, but who knows....
not terribly happy/upset with some of them

KCJohnny 01-11-2009 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5378484)
Rams likely want Andre Smith. I think either Stafford OR Mays will be there at #3. Or both, in which case we take Stafford.

Thanks.

So who is the QBotF for the Rams? Isn't Bulger about 32?

Valiant 01-11-2009 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 5378505)
Thanks.

So who is the QBotF for the Rams? Isn't Bulger about 32?

I don't think the Rams believe they are in rebuilding road.. Just a ****ing awful year..

mylittlepony 01-11-2009 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5378435)
This also concerning drafting strategy if KC believes Albert is cemented at LT, and Sanchez/Stafford isn't there. I'm kind of expecting them making the team trading up sell there soul which would mean next years 1st round pick and another day 1 pick if they just totally fell in love with a specific player.if they won't do that pick the BPA even if it's an LT and move Albert to RT. I rather do that then allow a team to believe we need to trade down to fill a need because then you'd get the bad end of the deal because of the undercutting.

Exactly.I agree 100%. You draft by looking at your board not at your roster.

Getting top 15 talent with a top 3 pick (just because of the position he plays) is bad value.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.