ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Pics from Star Trek set (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=256481)

BillSelfsTrophycase 02-25-2012 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8397320)
I'm sorry, they can't use Star Trek 2 for the title. It was already filmed and came out June 4, 1982.
Best ST Scene Ever

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7jwLWx7xWvM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

mikey23545 02-25-2012 08:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott free (Post 8398701)
:shake: the new Spock just showed more of his human side, why should he have to be so dull & logical when he is after all, half human?

I sure enjoyed it more than any of the previous Shatner & Piccard snoozers, granted i'm not emotionally tied to the old casts like a lot of others, but i thought it did a good job of keeping most of the key elements of the old mythos & expanding upon the main characters pasts.

To each their own i guess.
Hell, I've seen the light!

Let's make him half gay as well, and we can watch him going down on Kirk instead of them playing 3 dimensional chess!

Easy 6 02-25-2012 08:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 8398718)
Hell, I've seen the light!

Let's make him half gay as well, and we can watch him going down on Kirk instead of them playing 3 dimensional chess!
LMAO ok fine.

mikey23545 02-25-2012 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott free (Post 8398741)
LMAO ok fine.
Hell, dude, I'm just taking it out on you. As you can tell, I was not a big fan of this new Trek...

Glad you enjoyed it, so don't let this grumpy old man ruin it for you...:thumb:

milkman 02-25-2012 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 8398656)
I wonder if Spock is going to be acting like a sex-crazed hormone-imbalanced teenager again...

They may have suckered me out of my money the first time, but it'll never happen again. Absolutely the WORST abortion of a "re-imagining" of an iconic sci-fi franchise in cinematic history. I almost wept at its awfulness.

I bet Gene Roddenberry was spinning in his grave fast enough to spawn a rogue black hole.
I would think since he's half human, that the human side would be harder to control as a young man/Vulcan.

That, to me, would be an interesting aspect of the growth and maturing of Spock to explore in these movies.

milkman 02-25-2012 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 8398702)
I hope they continue with the storyline of giving command of the Enterprise, the flagship of Star Fleet, to a 23 year old Star Fleet Academy graduate as well...Kind of like the USN giving command of a $10 billion aircraft carrier to some 20 year old kid who they had just signed up at the recruitment office...
I admit, I did find that difficult to accept.

Easy 6 02-25-2012 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carls20yearplan (Post 8398711)
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-qDupjWPuIU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
LMAO, ROFL, :LOL:

This things ****ING HILARIOUS & makes great points, i have to run a ten minute errand & finishing it is going to be my Top Priority when i get back.

The guys voice is the real sell.

Deberg_1990 02-25-2012 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 8398656)
I wonder if Spock is going to be acting like a sex-crazed hormone-imbalanced teenager again...

They may have suckered me out of my money the first time, but it'll never happen again. Absolutely the WORST abortion of a "re-imagining" of an iconic sci-fi franchise in cinematic history. I almost wept at its awfulness.

I bet Gene Roddenberry was spinning in his grave fast enough to spawn a rogue black hole.
I guess your in the minority then. It was by faaar, the highest grossing Star Trek film ever and absolutely revitalized a tired, worn out franchise.

loochy 02-25-2012 10:27 PM
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...tattooborg.jpg

Bowser 02-26-2012 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loochy (Post 8399037)
I am HERPDERP of Borg. All Your Base Are Belong To Us.

mikey23545 02-26-2012 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8398866)
I guess your in the minority then. It was by faaar, the highest grossing Star Trek film ever and absolutely revitalized a tired, worn out franchise.
Wow, I guess now that I think of it people with taste have always been fewer in number than trailer park slack jaws who think a bunch of explosions and shiny lights are the ultimate in movie making.

Discuss Thrower 02-26-2012 02:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 8399267)
Wow, I guess now that I think of it people with taste have always been fewer in number than trailer park slack jaws who think a bunch of explosions and shiny lights are the ultimate in movie making.
Coming from an unabashed nerd who was raised on TNG and grew to like DS9 on my own, the Abrams reboot was needed because it stepped away from the 40 years of "canon" backstory and focused on the relationships between it's main characters, which as much as it might not fit exactly with what TOS did, in essence it mimicked half of what made the original series good in the Kirk/Spock/McCoy dynamic.

Yes, it's hard to copy what made TOS good considering it was the heyday of good SciFi in that it made you think and question things, but if you ignore that aspect and feel that StarTrek is fundamentally about "fun" and "adventures" then the newest movie did just that.


At least that's how I feel.

Deberg_1990 02-26-2012 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 8399323)
Coming from an unabashed nerd who was raised on TNG and grew to like DS9 on my own, the Abrams reboot was needed because it stepped away from the 40 years of "canon" backstory and focused on the relationships between it's main characters, which as much as it might not fit exactly with what TOS did, in essence it mimicked half of what made the original series good in the Kirk/Spock/McCoy dynamic.

Yes, it's hard to copy what made TOS good considering it was the heyday of good SciFi in that it made you think and question things, but if you ignore that aspect and feel that StarTrek is fundamentally about "fun" and "adventures" then the newest movie did just that.


At least that's how I feel.
Well said and exactly how I feel. The Kirk/Spock/McCoy dynamic has always been one of the best things about Trek

keg in kc 02-26-2012 01:18 PM
I thought the villain needed more screen time/development in '09 Star Trek but other than that it was a quite enjoyable film with really good chemistry amongst the cast.

keg in kc 10-05-2012 12:03 AM
Sneak peek!

<iframe width="640" height="465" src="http://teamcoco.com/embed/v/41587" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.