ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Shaunard Harts. Boerigter Fujita Receives Offer (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=111126)

blackhawk 03-02-2005 01:00 PM

Shaunard Harts. Boerigter Fujita Receives Offer
 
Chiefs | Harts Receives Offer - from www.KFFL.com
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:31:53 -0800

Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs have tendered a one-year, $656,000 offer to restricted free agent S Shaunard Harts.


Chiefs | Boerigter Receives Offer - from www.KFFL.com
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:31:04 -0800

Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs have tendered a one-year, $656,000 offer to restricted free agent WR Marc Boerigter.


Chiefs | Fujita Receives Offer - from www.KFFL.com
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:30:13 -0800

Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs have tendered a one-year, $656,000 offer to restricted free agent LB Scott Fujita.

siberian khatru 03-02-2005 01:03 PM

Why all the same salary? Is that league minumum or something? (pardon my ignorance)

Rausch 03-02-2005 01:04 PM

I really don't think it's a great idea to lowball our OLB when we're already needing starters at MLB and OLB on the other side.

While Fuj isn't a probowl player he's solid.

KCTitus 03-02-2005 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru
Why all the same salary? Is that league minumum or something? (pardon my ignorance)

yes..vet minimum.

htismaqe 03-02-2005 01:05 PM

Yeah, I believe that's the minimum.

keg in kc 03-02-2005 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
I really don't think it's a great idea to lowball our OLB when we're already needing starters at MLB and OLB on the other side.

While Fuj isn't a probowl player he's solid.

That's not lowballing him, that's the midlevel tender, where'd we have right of first refusal and would recoup a draft pick if he goes. I don't think he requires the top-level one.

jspchief 03-02-2005 01:10 PM

So Fujita is of the same value to us as a back-up safety? Seems like an insulting offer to me.

Kclee 03-02-2005 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
So Fujita is of the same value to us as a back-up safety? Seems like an insulting offer to me.



No one on D can feel insulted. They all collected paychecks last year. Fortunate is more like it.

Clint in Wichita 03-02-2005 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
So Fujita is of the same value to us as a back-up safety? Seems like an insulting offer to me.


If another FS isn't found, Harts should take Woods' starting job away next season. Permanently.

keg in kc 03-02-2005 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
So Fujita is of the same value to us as a back-up safety? Seems like an insulting offer to me.

It's not a matter of making an offer, the different level tenders are established by the NFL. It's sort of a smaller version of a franchise or transition tag.

tiptap 03-02-2005 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc
That's not lowballing him, that's the midlevel tender, where'd we have right of first refusal and would recoup a draft pick if he goes. I don't think he requires the top-level one.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...ohn&id=1743706

. . . Restricted free agency: From March 2 through a week before the draft, players with three years of experience can shop their services, but teams that sign them may have to pay a price related to the round in which the player was picked when he came into the league. For example, a former third-round choice requires third-round compensation from the signing team. Teams that are losing a player, though, have a week to match a restricted offer sheet. Restricted free agents are offered a one-year tender at $656,000. Teams can further restrict movement of these players by increasing the tenders. By offering $1.430 million, the team can't lose that player unless they receive a first-round choice. For $1.906 million, the team puts the player's price at first- and third-round choices. A more exclusive tender has been created to prevent movement of a player with three years experience. It's rarely used, but it would count $2.406 million against the cap. . . . .

cmh6476 03-02-2005 01:20 PM

I like these offers, and like the fact they're not offering Easy a contract :thumb:

buddha 03-02-2005 01:21 PM

Fujita
 
Don't mistake approaching average, for "solid". Who was "solid" on that defense last year, and how would anybody know?

Nobody from that group deserves a raise! Get serious.

keg in kc 03-02-2005 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiptap
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...ohn&id=1743706

. . . Restricted free agency: From March 2 through a week before the draft, players with three years of experience can shop their services, but teams that sign them may have to pay a price related to the round in which the player was picked when he came into the league. For example, a former third-round choice requires third-round compensation from the signing team. Teams that are losing a player, though, have a week to match a restricted offer sheet. Restricted free agents are offered a one-year tender at $656,000. Teams can further restrict movement of these players by increasing the tenders. By offering $1.430 million, the team can't lose that player unless they receive a first-round choice. For $1.906 million, the team puts the player's price at first- and third-round choices. A more exclusive tender has been created to prevent movement of a player with three years experience. It's rarely used, but it would count $2.406 million against the cap. . . . .

Exactly.

Thanks for posting that, I was in the process of looking up something like that myself.

jspchief 03-02-2005 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiptap
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...ohn&id=1743706

. . . Restricted free agency: From March 2 through a week before the draft, players with three years of experience can shop their services, but teams that sign them may have to pay a price related to the round in which the player was picked when he came into the league. For example, a former third-round choice requires third-round compensation from the signing team. Teams that are losing a player, though, have a week to match a restricted offer sheet. Restricted free agents are offered a one-year tender at $656,000. Teams can further restrict movement of these players by increasing the tenders. By offering $1.430 million, the team can't lose that player unless they receive a first-round choice. For $1.906 million, the team puts the player's price at first- and third-round choices. A more exclusive tender has been created to prevent movement of a player with three years experience. It's rarely used, but it would count $2.406 million against the cap. . . . .

Great info. Rep.

So does that mean that Fujita can't turn the offer down? And if he can't, the only way he doesn't get paid that tender is if some other team aggressivley pursues him, correct?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.