Seriously, Herm has to go
 

I don't think I could remain sane if we played Herm's not-to-lose crap when the games matter. This game is a microcosm of why Herm simply CANNOT be a successful head coach.

yup

The Sun is hot, and water is wet.

This is so on herm

here's an original idea...

Bob Dole is afraid that Herm is going to get one more year to prove that this bullshit brand of football can work. If we had better players, his philosophy might be workable (even though it never has), so that's going to be the excuse.

No, see that's the problem. Give Herm better players and this exact same ****ing thing happens in the playoffs instead of to a 2-11 team.

The reeruned SOB played with an 11 point lead like it was 30. He continually played close to the vest on offense in the second half even though his defense can stop a f3cking sneeze?

If we had an owner who gave a fuck about winning he be fired, have his company car confiscated and be forced to walk home (and hopefully be stuck be a passing semi while walking along I-70).

He's fucking reeruned - just like his defensive coordinator, Gunt, and 7/8ths of his coaching staff. He should be shown the door immediately.

cosign

like there is a decent football Head Coach
who can't find a better gig this of season

herm should see if ISU will hire him

I seriously hope San Diego State is dumb enough to want the sonavabitch.

He can take Gunt with his stupid ass.

Herm's problem, and it was evident when he was with the Jets, is this play-not-to-lose crap. It's the reason posters like myself and Cdcox hated the guy from the start. He simply can't properly manage risk.

i also believe that herm has to go. this is an excellent point.

Thus the "even though it never has" part of the post.

We have a better line, LJ picks up the first. We have a solid kicker, we don't miss chipshots. We're not starting our 3rd string QB, he doesn't run with 30 seconds left. We win enough games to make the playoffs and then we get punked.

Bob Dole was around for the Marty years. Bob Dole understands the philosophy of play-not-to-lose just fine. But does Clark?