ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Why Pioli?

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Why Pioli? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199332)

Just wondering. What has he done that makes him a better candidate than others?

He works for New England, he must be the best! /typical CP response

He got his name into the media and they ran with it.

It just seems like a good idea to hire people from great organizations.

Comes from a winning program - has shown he is smart with personnel, veteran or no - understudy Dmitroff has been lights out in Atlanta as their GM - certainly must want to get out from under the shadow of Belichick

He has no previous relationships with the Chiefs.

why not Pioli?

i mean he's young and comes from the Player Personnel dept of arguably the best organization of the last 10 years.

what else are you gonna base your decision on?

Quote:

The Winningest Team In Past 11 Years- Brief Statistical View

Posted 29-Oct-2008 at 04:23 AM by towen5 
Updated 29-Oct-2008 at 05:25 AM by towen5
 In a thread a person mentioned merging the conferences and creating two divisions with promotion and relegation based on teams performances over the past 11 years.

Now obviously this idea was slated and shot out of the water, but it got me thinking.

How have teams been doing over the past 11 years? Would there be any surprising data?

I started by compiling a spreadsheet database of win-lose records for each team for the last 11 years. I then highlighted playoff appearances and super bowl wins. I then calculated a total win-loss record for the year and used this to work out a win percentage (this meant i could compare teams who had played different amounts of games ie. Browns and Texans)

This winning percentage then allowed me to rank the teams.

Here is a basic form what i found:

Rank---Winning %---Playoff Apps---Sbowl Apps

1. Patriots - 67.04% (8 p/o Apps) (3 sb wins)
2. Packers - 62.50% (8 p/o Apps)
3. Colts - 61.36% (8 p/o Apps) (1 sb win)
4. Broncos - 60.89% (8 p/o Apps) (2 sb wins)
5. Steelers - 60.51% (8 p/o Apps) (1 sb win)
6. Jaguars - 56.81% (8 p/o Apps)
7. Titans - 56.25% (8 p/o Apps)
8. Seahawks - 55.68% (8 p/o Apps)
9. Eagles - 55.39% (8 p/o Apps)
10. Bucs - 54.54% (7 p/o Apps) (1 sb win)
11. Vikings - 54.54% (5 Playoff Apps)
12. Giants - 53.12% (6 p/o Apps) (1 sb win)
13. Chiefs - 52.84% (3 p/o Apps)
14. Ravens - 52.55% (4 p/o Apps) (1 sb win)
15. Jets - 51.70% (5 p/o Apps)
16. Rams - 51.13% (5 p/o Apps) (1 sb win)
17. Dolphins - 50.56% (5 p/o Apps)
18. Cowboys - 48.86% (5 p/o Apps)
19. Redskins - 46.87% (3 p/o Apps)
20. 49ers - 46.59% (4 p/o Apps)
21. Falcons - 46.30% (3 p/o Apps)
22. Chargers - 46.02% (3 p/o Apps)
23. Bills - 45.45% (2 p/o Apps)
24. Bears - 44.88% (3 p/o Apps)
25. Panthers - 44.31% (2 p/o Apps)
26. Saints - 43.75% (2 p/o Apps)
27. Raiders - 40.90% (3 p/o Apps)
28. Bengals - 38.63% (1 p/o Apps)
29. Lions - 35.22% (2 p/o Apps)
30. Cardinals - 35.22% (1 p/o Apps)
31. Browns - 34.72% (1 p/o Apps)
32. Texans - 33.33%

NFC ranks total - 280 - 48.93% (3 sb wins)

AFC ranks total - 248 - 51.36% (8 sb wins)

Obviously the lower the number the better the teams are as a whole in that conference.

Issues with the study

Firstly i would like to state there were a few issues that affected the quality of the data.

Obviously the Texans were formed in 2002 but because it was based on win percentage that didn't really matter. The same goes for the Browns missing '97 and '98.

I decided to include Tennessee Oilers as part of Tennessee Titans stats and also included all the stats from the Seahawks prior to their shift to the NFC in 2001. This therefore may affect the outcome.

I decided that tied games would count as 0.5 win 0.5 loss.

10 Key Results

1. There seems to be a massive gap with the 'Top 5' teams compared to the rest of the league. They relatively seem to have dominated the last 11 years, especially New England.

2. There are a few teams that are surprisingly high, would you say that the Packers are the 2nd best team in the NFL? (based on empirical data)

3. A few are also surprisingly low. Would you rate the Cowboys as a mid rate team?

4. Is it a surprise over the past 11 years the AFC has been a better conference? Also, would you have guessed that over the past 11 years the NFC as a whole has lost over half their games.

5. The Texans are the only team in the league to not reach the playoffs in the last 11 years. Also, only 2 teams have won the Super Bowl more than once over this period. This demonstrates the parity of the NFL.

7. Over the past 11 years we have seen 16-0 (Patriots), 15-1 (Steelers), 1-15 (Miami, Panthers & Chargers)

8. The lowest winning record of a Super Bowl winner during this period was last years Giants at 10-6.

9. 5 teams in the AFC won more than 100 games (1 with 99) - Broncos, Colts, Jaguars, Pats & Steelers (Titans), while only the Packers managed this for the NFC.

10. The AFC won 97 more games than the NFC over this period.

This was my first foray into statistical research based on the NFL so im aware that its quite simple stats but i would love any feedback as it will help me improve.

Thanks for being so patient, i have added an attachment containing my spreadsheet in a compressed file for anyone that wants to check it out.

http://forum.nfluk.com/blog.php?b=162

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Jesus (Post 5336722)

Just wondering. What has he done that makes him a better candidate than others?

Personally, I don't really want him here because I think he brings Matt Cassell and the Chiefs would have to trade for him.

If we can avoid that mistake, then I am all for bringing him in.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5336748)

Personally, I don't really want him here because I think he brings Matt Cassell and the Chiefs would have to trade for him.

If we can avoid that mistake, then I am all for bringing him in.

I believe Cassel is a free agent at end of this season.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5336748)

Personally, I don't really want him here because I think he brings Matt Cassell and the Chiefs would have to trade for him.

If we can avoid that mistake, then I am all for bringing him in.

No way do the Patriots let Cassell walk, especially with Brady's rehab not going well. They'll franchise him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by txhawk (Post 5336759)

I believe Cassel is a free agent at end of this season.

Even if they are willing to part with Cassel, they will franchise him to get compensation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 5336763)

No way do the Patriots let Cassell walk, especially with Brady's rehab not going well. They'll franchise him.

That is the point. They will want significant compensation for him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5336775)

That is the point. They will want significant compensation for him.

They won't let him walk, period, unless they know for sure Brady is ready to go at 100% next season. I could see the Pats franchising him and letting him ride the pine, if need be.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 5336763)

No way do the Patriots let Cassell walk, especially with Brady's rehab not going well. They'll franchise him.

i don't see anyway the Pats can franchise Cassell

this would mandate a 8-9 million 1 year contract for him.

not gonna happen imo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 5336783)

They won't let him walk, period, unless they know for sure Brady is ready to go at 100% next season. I could see the Pats franchising him and letting him ride the pine, if need be.

I think the Pats are smart enough to cash in when they can. A year from now, they probably don't get the same offers.

But, we will see what happens.