![]() |
Would you take a modern-day Art Still with the #3 pick?
So would you take a guy guaranteed to have an equivalent career as Art Still with the 3rd overall pick of the draft, over whoever you favor now?
For those of you that didn't see him play, he was a LDE with 48.5 career sacks, not including his first 4 years, when the NFL was not recording sacks. Considering that sacks were not counted during his best year of 1980, I think he probably had around 75 career sacks. He went to 4 pro-bowls and in 1980 he was named to several all-conference and all-NFL teams. Of the years where his sacks were recorded he had 14.5 in 1984 and 10.5 in 1986, with 4 to 6 sacks in the other years. But his real strength was in the running game. He anchored the left side of the line against the run for a decade. He was probably one of the best run defenders at DE that I've ever seen. He had the ability to hold his ground and slip off the block just at the right moment to pull down the RB for little or no gain. Surrounding talent around him was bad at the beginning of his career but got better when Bill Mass came. If you draft Stills, he will be exactly the kind of player he was when he played: no better or no worse. Do you take him over whomever you currently like in this draft? |
I'm a big fan of Still, but no.
|
Quote:
|
nope.
|
Not over a franchise QB.
Why didnt the Cowboys select DT over Aikman in 89? |
No.
|
Quote:
I like this: 1 Dallas Cowboys Troy Aikman Quarterback UCLA Hall of Famer 2 Green Bay Packers Tony Mandarich Offensive Tackle Michigan State BUST 3 Detroit Lions Barry Sanders [3] Running Back Oklahoma State HALL OF FAMER 4 Kansas City Chiefs Derrick Thomas Linebacker Alabama HALL OF FAMER 5 Atlanta Falcons Deion Sanders Cornerback Florida State Perennial Pro Bowler |
Quote:
|
no. our #3 better be QB or BPA. trade down for more depending on LJ/TG situation.
|
Art Still was pretty good in his day. The guy who I used to share Chiefs season tickets with had St. Louis football Cardinals season tickets back in the '80's, and he said Still was the only guy who ever dominated Dan Dierdorf.
They played the 3-4 when Still was here, so I would consider him more of a Richard Seymour type. Hell yeah, I'd take that guy at #3 this year. Still had a couple off years when he became a vegetarian and went on an all-berry diet, I think he played a couple years in the 252 pound range, which was too light, even for back then. IIRC, there was some discussion about taking Wes Chandler with that pick in 1978, but I think the Chiefs were happy they took Still. It would have been nice if they would've kept him and let him play opposite Neil and Derrick in '89-'90. Just curious...why didn't you ask if we would take Neil Smith with the #3 pick? Is there a guy in this draft who reminds you more of Still than Smith? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Stills didn't like to practice but he really didn't need to.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.