Curry
 

They were just saying on ESPN that he wouldn't be a very good fit for the Chiefs 3-4 defense but they should draft him anyways. :shake:

"They"

Who are "They"?

ChiefsPlanet members?

Mel Kiper and whoever else was on I don't know her name.

They = The Hearsay Experts for You.

I don't think there's one member who thinks he doesn't fit.

They just don't believe he plays a position that should be drafted at #3 overall.

Yeah, ok, that explains it.

Suzy Kolber, she must think she is a legit NFL analyst since Joe Willy Namath hit on her a few years back

Mel Kiper basically think Curry is going to be Keith Bulluck which well means he's a bad fit for a 3-4.

This. He can play outside in a 4-3 or inside in a 3-4. He's a solid player with alot of upside.

But he's not worth the #3 overall.

I'd like to see an analysis on similarly situated LB talent over the past several years, for example, how they were hyped (by the well-known pundits like Kiper and Mayock), described, and how they worked out. Then, having someone compare what we are hearing about Curry in comparison, would be an interesting exercise.

So long as you keep in mind that most if not all of us would be fine taking him in the 8-10 range, earlier than elite prospects such as Patrick Willis.

Bad draft, I know, I know. That's why we should trade down.

just say no to jesus

Care to elaborate on this? why couldn't Bulluck play in a 34

As an inside backer sure...outside backer not so much.

Guys like Bulluck are nice pieces to have but would you use a top 5 pick on the guy?