![]() |
Would KC have a win of Gailey wasn't fired?
Would the Chiefs have won the Cowboys or Raiders game if Chan was around calling shots and getting the most out of a horrible roster? Could a pistol like formation have beaten the Raiders?
|
ROFL
No... |
ROFLROFL
No I don't so either.... |
Hard to say. I think we could've been more productive offensively.
Enough to win? Not sure about that. |
irrelevant since Haley wouldn't of allow Gailey to run the pistol etc anyway.
although i did think it was humorous that Haley has run LJ in that delayed draw several times this year ... which is pretty dam close to a pistol type play. |
No. Gailey doesn't make passes. He doesn't run the ball. He doesn't make pre-snap reads. He doesn't block. He doesn't run routes, and he doesn't score touchdowns
|
Quote:
|
the three teams that fired their OCs before the start of the season are a combined 1-14. but i guess it really doesnt mean anything
|
The Chiefs would at least know an offense if he was still here, so the chances would be greater that we would have a win. It wouldn't be the same offense as it was last year, but the players would have a much better feel of the system. Completely changing it before the last pre-season game ****ed the offense over hard.
|
If they did go back to some kind of gimmick offense, to me it's the equivalent of treading water. This team needs to figure out how to swim in a pro style offense, even at the expense of losing games.
|
When the Chiefs fired Gailey they had to implement new blocking schemes. Our O-line would still have been terrible, but a lot of Gailey's plays seemed to take into consideration how horrible our 0-line is more than Haley's do.
|
Quote:
|
Didn't our look like crap in the preseason before Chan was put down? Yeah it did. No we wouldn't have won a game if we kept Chan at OC.
PhilFree:arrow: |
Quote:
|
and if we had one win life would change how?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.