Based upon what I'm seeing so far here..
 

I'm almost inclined to make my own list of top players since I pretty heavily disagree with a ton of things.

1. There is no chance in hell you do that, because you never do that.

2. Should hell freeze over, and you actually do, I know I'd love it.

I should do one, it'd take me some time and all but I'm pretty inclined..

Should I do just a list of everyone or position by position?

I'd do it position by position, because then later you can see if you can try to create a "big board" out of it. I don't really think that's your style because you're more of an observational guy than you are a comprehensive analysis guy, but I'd enjoy it. Position by position would work.

I'd also enjoy a preliminary, doesn't-mean-shit-at-this-point Mecca mock.

A "Mocca"? Forget it.

If I were you I'd plug a big one into a spreadsheet and use auto filter to do position by position.

But I'm a ****ing accounting nerd. So do whatever you want. I'll read it and appreciate it.
Posted via Mobile Device

Is it really that hard to make up a list of the best prospects? You can do the top guys at each position fairly easily, in a minute or so.

DL: Suh, with McCoy as runner up.
LOT: Okung with Bulaga as runner up (provided he is healthy).
RT: Trent Williams.
WR: Bryant, Benn and some would say Williams. Good slots guys Tate, Shipley.
ILB: McClain with Spikes as the runner up.
Safety: Berry.
34 OLB: probably the toughest to judge. Probably Morgan if he can transition followed by Graham, Hughes and Norwood.

QB: Locker or Clausen.

I'm pretty sure he's going to do more than just 1 or 2 people per position. STFU

Since the original thread said he was considering creating a list of "top" players. 2 people per position gives you a good idea of the "top" players.

Do it man, id appreciate it! who knows this could lead to ur very own draft site... lol