ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Terrence Cody slims down to 354 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=224058)

Quesadilla Joe 02-28-2010 06:29 AM

Terrence Cody slims down to 354
 
Quote:

Posted by Michael David Smith on February 28, 2010 6:49 AM ET

When we last mentioned former Alabama defensive tackle Terrence Cody, he was weighing in at 370 pounds at the Senior Bowl.

He's been losing weight at a rate of half a pound a day since then.

Cody weighed in at 354 pounds on Saturday, a weight that doesn't exactly make him svelte, but does indicate that he's been taking his diet and conditioning seriously over the last month.

Gil Brandt, the longtime VP of player personnel for the Cowboys who now analyzes the draft for NFL.com, thinks teams are going to move Cody up on their draft boards as a result of his weigh-in.

"Terrence Cody just made himself lots of money. I'll tell you what. It's a seven-figure number," Brandt said. "The Brinks truck just stopped at his house."
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...s-down-to-354/

You just watch. The Chiefs are gonna draft him in the top 5.:)

Hog's Gone Fishin 02-28-2010 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6564813)
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...s-down-to-354/

You just watch. The Chiefs are gonna draft him in the top 5.:)



No they're not. Neg Rep!

RealSNR 02-28-2010 11:08 AM

Eh, go suck Robert Ayers' cock.

BossChief 02-28-2010 01:50 PM

More like he may have climbed up to #10/11 going to Denver

KCrockaholic 02-28-2010 08:56 PM

He will be available for the Chiefs 2A pick :) Just where we want him, while Denver reaches for NT Dan Williams, because their first Dan Williams didn't turn out very well.

Ebolapox 02-28-2010 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6566169)
He will be available for the Chiefs 2A pick :) Just where we want him, while Denver reaches for NT Dan Williams, because their first Dan Williams didn't turn out very well.

psst. let's not compare how dan williams went for EITHER of our teams, eh? remember, he was a chief as well and after one good season and a franchise tag/sitting out a whole season, it didn't end well for us either.

KCrockaholic 02-28-2010 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 6566179)
psst. let's not compare how dan williams went for EITHER of our teams, eh? remember, he was a chief as well and after one good season and a franchise tag/sitting out a whole season, it didn't end well for us either.

Yeah, yeah. I know. I just tried to ignore that and focus on his sucky Donk career :)

Gadzooks 02-28-2010 10:26 PM

This proves he has the self discipline to regulate his weight and will allow him to run a sub 10 second 40 but I don’t think it will make a huge difference in his ranking.
350 is still enormous (which isn’t a bad thing), and I still see him going in the late first early second.
It would have been a red flag had he shown up at 400 lbs+ .

milkman 02-28-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zooks (Post 6566285)
This proves he has the self discipline to regulate his weight and will allow him to run a sub 10 second 40 but I don’t think it will make a huge difference in his ranking.
350 is still enormous (which isn’t a bad thing), and I still see him going in the late first early second.
It would have been a red flag had he shown up at 400 lbs+ .

If he runs a sub 9, watch out.

KCrockaholic 02-28-2010 11:42 PM

On a serious note, who knows, besides Rich Eisen, is the slowest 40 time at the combine of all time? Just curious.

Saccopoo 03-01-2010 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zooks (Post 6566285)
This proves he has the self discipline to regulate his weight and will allow him to run a sub 10 second 40 but I don’t think it will make a huge difference in his ranking.
350 is still enormous (which isn’t a bad thing), and I still see him going in the late first early second.
It would have been a red flag had he shown up at 400 lbs+ .

The thing is, he's not like Wilfork or Hampton who played around three bill in college and have had to dine at the all you can eat Oktoberfest buffet nightly to get to what they are today. Cody's frame is absolutely enormous, and he'll benefit from a strict weight training regime and the longer conditioning of the NFL season. (Depending upon the team and his desire.) He is pretty athletic for his size and does have excellent power and leverage on the field, at least at the collegiate level. Once everything is said and done, I can see him playing around 380 or so in three or four years and be utterly immovable. However, you've got to worry about guys like that. Their mass makes them susceptible to fatigue and they can burn themselves out quickly, e.g. Haynesworth, Rogers, Jenkins. There are very few guys like Ted Washington - ever.

DumbHillbillies 03-01-2010 02:18 AM

26 pounds in 4 weeks not too bad. I thought he could get around there if he was to show commitment. Not the 40 lbs he said he would lose after the senior bowl but 354 seems like a more natural weight loss.

Mecca 03-01-2010 03:00 AM

354 is probably his playing weight so it's not that big of a deal.

Brock 03-01-2010 10:10 AM

A guy like that should be able to lose 15 pounds in a week easily. Acting like this is a big deal is funny.

KCUnited 03-01-2010 10:12 AM

Shows he may good during a contract year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.