ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Video Games Chargers vs Chiefs (Madden 2011 Player Ratings) (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=230153)

mcaj22 07-01-2010 11:37 AM

Chargers vs Chiefs (Madden 2011 Player Ratings)
 
http://espn.go.com/espn/thelife/vide...ers-and-chiefs

Thought it was interesting, what do you guys think he rated correctly or incorrectly?



Note: The guy that does the player ratings for EA is a Broncos fan(homer).

Mr. Flopnuts 07-01-2010 11:39 AM

LMAO Our QB is a 78. Shame he's not paid like a 78.

mcaj22 07-01-2010 11:43 AM

yea he made Cassel so bad it's almost unplayable.

BossChief 07-01-2010 11:47 AM

For the most part, those are pretty close IMO. I don't see how Croyles injury rating is a 78 though, it should be a 50 or 60 max.

ToxSocks 07-01-2010 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6853737)
For the most part, those are pretty close IMO. I don't see how Croyles injury rating is a 78 though, it should be a 50 or 60 max.

That and no love at all for Carr. Carr should be more like a 78, not a 72.

KurtCobain 07-01-2010 12:03 PM

Flower's should've been a 90.

Sofa King 07-01-2010 12:05 PM

Boy they f-ing bombed the Lbers......

Williams sucks, Hali should be higher, Vrabel sucks... Johnson is fairly close...

Quesadilla Joe 07-01-2010 12:06 PM

Orton should be at least an 85

BossChief 07-01-2010 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6853758)
That and no love at all for Carr. Carr should be more like a 78, not a 72.

That was one that I disagree with. I agree a 78 is about what he should be.

Sofa King 07-01-2010 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6853766)
Orton should be at least an 85

based on what exactly?

ClevelandBronco 07-01-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6853771)
based on what exactly?

He means 85 proof.

Quesadilla Joe 07-01-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6853771)
based on what exactly?

Mark Sanchez and Jason Cambell have an 82 and 83 rating and Orton is better than both of those guys. His awareness and accuracy should be bumped up.

SDChiefs 07-01-2010 12:12 PM

Demario Williams is our highest rated LB?

ToxSocks 07-01-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6853763)
Boy they f-ing bombed the Lbers......

Williams sucks, Hali should be higher, Vrabel sucks... Johnson is fairly close...

I noticed that too. Williams was too high and Hali too low. I think Vrable at 77 was probably about right, Johnson at 76 is close enough.

mcaj22 07-01-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6853763)
Boy they f-ing bombed the Lbers......

Williams sucks, Hali should be higher, Vrabel sucks... Johnson is fairly close...



Hali is actually very good, even though the OVR is just an 80, his attributes to rush the passer are par with how he is in real life, what hinders the overall average is I'm assuming his pass coverage skills are low for a LBer. That's how it is with most 3-4 OLB in the Madden games though.

Williams is an 82 because he was the leading tackler last season. So it kind of makes sense, even though from a real life fan's perspective he did nothing.

Boy they really made Jarrad Page shitty.

Jamaal Charles just looks filthy in the game. 97 Speed 98 acceleration.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.