![]() |
Sports Science breaks down MNF's controversial conclusion
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/vng4fR8O17I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
That last line made me lose it. LMAO |
**** Brady and the Patriots. That's my conclusion.
|
It was a terrible, on evvery level. I think after one PI on the drive the ref just didn't want the wrath of the Carolina crowd coming down on him.
If that had been us vs Peyton... |
Oh well, every team gets screwed by a bad call at one time or another. Don't feel sad for Patriots not one little bit.
|
He not only needed to decelerate, but accelerate in the opposite direction. If he made that catch completely unguarded, it would have been on of the more miraculous plays in NFL history, let alone a defensed pass attempt.
That would have been Dante's juke on the Broncos, on steroids, in a man twice the size and mass. Forget human joystick, he'd be the human stealth fighter in a stealth bomber's body. |
So there is no holding or pass interference if the ball lands 2-3 yards away from the reciever?
They can put you in a body lock, not allow you to go towards the ball and if lands 2-3 yeards away, no pass interference? Really?....Really!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Noun A deliberate exaggeration used for effect |
There's no way they were going to let a weak flag decide the game. The ball was not catchable.
|
Enjoyed the ending of that video.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The first and last time Brady didn't get a call.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.