ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Should they have called this unnecessary roughness (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=327220)

-King- 12-08-2019 11:25 PM

Should they have called this unnecessary roughness
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">They would call this if it was on Brady <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/KCvsNE?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#KCvsNE</a> <a href="https://t.co/Ml8caUNpxG">pic.twitter.com/Ml8caUNpxG</a></p>&mdash; Koro (@nonsmoknlifboat) <a href="https://twitter.com/nonsmoknlifboat/status/1203823164364644358?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 8, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


This is an argument I'm having in another thread. Supposedly this hit should have been flagged because Mahomes was heading out of bounds even though he asnt officially out of bounds yet. IMO, there's no way this should be flagged. A player in bounds is a player in bounds and can get hit. As much as I'd love for Mahomes to be protected, objectively there's no way they should call a penalty here.

Also it's weird how people hate the refs but want to add even more subjectivity to how they rule. So now they have to guess if a player is clearly going out of bounds on not? Makes no sense to me but hey...I'm CPs chief contrarian so I may be way off...

eDave 12-08-2019 11:26 PM

There should have been a brawl after that. Defend your guy, linemen.

KC_Connection 12-08-2019 11:27 PM

I've never seen a hit like this not called unnecessary roughness on an elite QB. And I can guarantee that if Mahomes was playing a different team in a different context, it absolutely would have been.

Rasputin 12-08-2019 11:27 PM

It would have been called against Tom Brady.

-King- 12-08-2019 11:27 PM

Messed up on the 3rd poll choice, I really am a dumbass LMAO. Should be "No it's not a penalty..."

DaFace 12-08-2019 11:28 PM

Should it be? No. Do they often call that? Absolutely.

-King- 12-08-2019 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 14645022)
It would have been called against Tom Brady.

So, it should or shouldn't be called a penalty?

-King- 12-08-2019 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 14645025)
Should it be? No. Do they often call that? Absolutely.

Can you fix the 3rd poll choice? :D

KS Smitty 12-08-2019 11:30 PM

Yes.

Imon Yourside 12-08-2019 11:30 PM

meant to vote the ORIGINAL #3 but happy with 1 now that the poll changed.

stevieray 12-08-2019 11:31 PM

Definitely necessary.

No penalty.


:rolleyes:

KS Smitty 12-08-2019 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14645024)
Messed up on the 3rd poll choice, I really am a dumbass LMAO. Should be "No it's not a penalty..."

Yes you are. :D

NJChiefsFan 12-08-2019 11:31 PM

If they never called it I would be fine with it not being. But in this league that's a penalty. They always call that.

The one they took away with the lb landing on Mahomes, ok, you can talk me into that one. Those kind they don't get consistent ever. But this they almost always call.

Imon Yourside 12-08-2019 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 14645035)
If they never called it I would be fine with it not being. But in this league that's a penalty. They always call that.

The one they took away with the lb landing on Mahomes, ok, you can talk me into that one. Those kind they don't get consistent ever. But this they almost always call.

Yes especially on the leagues "favored" golden boys.

staylor26 12-08-2019 11:32 PM

If they’re trying to be consistent, then yes that should be called


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.