Quote:
Originally Posted by scott free
So go ahead and explain the nuance.
Oh yes, ALL of that shit has been said in one way or another 10,000 times here... so does Axl get atleast some benefit of the doubt from you because of the receivers, tight ends, line, new team/scheme or not? Because all i ever see is those factors being swept completely under the rug.
Nothing matters to some of you... plays, drives, the record, none of it... you don't like the guy, never will and wont hear a single argument to the contrary.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott free
Forget it with that guy, all QB's have to be a superhuman capable of overcoming any and all problems singlehandedly, if they're not a top 5 player at the position... they're not worth having.
Now, if we had the rookie who shall go unnamed, he'd breeze us right through the playoffs and into the big game, because, you know... rookies can do that and not waste this great start.
|
Everything in bold is complete crap, unless you only read the most irrational posters here, or maybe you just
really like hyperbole and strawmen in order to make points on arguments that don't exist.
It's not nuance, it's reality... it's rarely black and white, and
never as ridiculous as you've described.
I have no idea how people can read guys like duncan, HemiEd, Bowser, OtWP, keg, Plow, Brock, Pablo (to name a few haters (holla!)) and come close to any of the conclusions you've made in those two posts, unless you're just here to troll or maybe if English is like your 3rd language.
I think the first thousand times my stance as well as those I mentioned was explained is probably enough, but I'm sure it'll get mentioned a few more times, so be on the look out for that. But, to answer your question (which seems to be about the only thing not in bold for some reason), yes, it is a rationally based opinion, so it takes all kinds of things into account.