|
I understand you lose as a team, and that there were things the O and Smith could've done to pull out the win, but it's small, very small compared to what really lost the game.
Answer this. Regardless of not running the clock or missing a few throws. Should the Chiefs have won with what Smith did? Were the numbers the O put up enough for a team to win nine times out of ten? Hell 19 times out of 20. The O played winning football without the one player everyone here would say they CAN'T win without. I have no complaints with the O.
|