Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus
Pretty much every LT tackle taken high in the draft last year started at RT.
They are all slated to be LT sooner than later.
This isn't a new idea, they aren't reinventing the wheel here.
This is hilarious, you guys were bitching we had a 1.1 at RT and now you are bitching he is going to be LT.
JFC
|
it is hilarious
boils down to those bitching that he was a bad pick, beit RT or LT, but who should we have taken? In my humble opinion, DT Richardson, RT/LT Fluker, and S Viccaro performed the best on the field over their rookie years, and there's no way we were taking Viccaro. that leaves Richardson and fluker, the #13 and #11 picks, respectively, that in our short evaluation period appear to be the best selections 1.1 so far. frankly, if they took a DT, the fan base may have stormed the stadium and burned it down. and at the time last year, nobody had fluker projected anywhere
except RT, so then they truly would have taken RT #1.
they chose the best upside in a downside talent pool. now they will play him where he was drafted to play.