View Single Post
Old 04-05-2014, 04:02 PM   #10
O.city O.city is offline
In Search of a Life
 
O.city's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $-725936
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcaj22 View Post
Pioli is a moot point when you trade for a 29 year old QB for two draft picks. I'd be fine with a rebuild if you weren't giving away picks for a soon to be now 30 year old QB in year 2.

If you wanna rebuild that's fine, tank the seasons, keep your picks, and use those 2nd rounds to build a core.

Seattle punted their first two seasons on shitty QBs and kept their draft picks.

This team painted itself in a corner to its fans by bringing in Alex Smith and Andy Reid won me over as a gigantic Alex Smith fan in year 1. Alex Smith's play for the Chiefs is some of the best QB play in a QB league we have seen on the Chiefs since Trent Green. So how dare I as a fan want them to put as much talent around him like DV did with Green even if it means sacrificing future years or cap money. I don't give a shit what happens in 2016 or 2017 if it means a chance to win in 2014 or 2015 with a guy that A) has been to an NFC Championship B) has shown he can win in the playoffs C) Will be better than whatever QB we draft/backup we trade for after him. Alex Smith bucks the trend of shitty retread backups we trade for because unlike the Bonos and Grbacs, Alex Smith is actually a decent NFL QB. He falls in that tier of a Cutler or Rivers that can move a ****ing offense.

This isn't a position where we have Christian Ponder and Matt Cassel as our QB options or Matt Schaub and Matt McGloin, we have a capable NFL starting QB that can win and I'm not sure why you would want to tread water with that for future picks?

You sold me on Alex Smith and I became a fan, now I want you to win something with him. How does that make me a bad fan?
I agree. And I never said you were a bad fan, nor do I think they feel they're rebuilding.

They're banking in this core being good enough, and along with their coaching, being able to develop players around them now.

It's a risk sure.

But again, I'm not sure how many times this current core has ha the same exact system am philosophies 2 straight years. Perhaps with continuity in said system, they don't need more high prices free agents
Posts: 84,239
O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.O.city is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote