View Single Post
Old 04-09-2014, 11:55 AM   #11
Discuss Thrower Discuss Thrower is offline
"You like to drink?"
 
Discuss Thrower's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "I like to drink."
Casino cash: $-420000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies View Post
Everyone knocked Mark Cuban, but he was right. People here think they've distanced themselves from the Chiefs, but I'd be willing to bet it's the NFL as a whole.

They're everywhere, on all the time, clearly ruining the game, and people are stepping away.

It's a subtle shift, but a lot of people are doing it...
What have Chiefs done to "reward" KC fans' loyalty?

I'm 26 and the Chiefs have had 15 winning seasons in that span. Only five of those seasons came since the year 2000 and a 3-11 record in the postseason.

And it's not like KC is the only fanbase that follows a mediocre team. Cleveland and Detroit are worse. The Jets have sucked outside of their defensive runs carrying Mark Sanchez. Jacksonville and Tennessee haven't done anything since 1999. Cincinnati is just a step higher than the Chiefs "success" wise. Miami and Buffalo get to be fisted by New England on regular occasions. Dallas is a perennial 8-8 team with the hype of Montana-era 9ers... Some of the same goes to the Bears. The Vikings would've been moved to LA had it not been for the Favre years and Adrian Peterson.

The NFL has been a Patriots / Packers / Steelers / Colts (Peyton Manning) / NFC East-flavor-of-the-week league for the better part of the decade. It looks to be transitioning to a 49ers / Seahawks / Panthers / Colts league owing to their young, marketable stars. It would be really no wonder if interest wanes because all of the other franchises not mentioned above aren't relevant nationwide or to the echo chambers that are ESPN and the NFL Network -especially when you figure out that a lot of these teams have outright sucked for the developmental years of the kids my age or younger: it leads to them being "bandwagon" fans loosely tied to a team that's probably not in their region or caring more on fantasy football.

But coming back to the Chiefs... They've been mediocre at best for almost two decades outside of a handful of seasons where they play exciting ball in the regular season only to get bounced in their first game of the playoffs. Depending on who you ask, they're still at the same competitive level as they were last season or they've actively gotten worse. And they're facing a tougher schedule alignment from drawing the NFC West and AFC East along with being in the awesome spot of being in the division with two other playoff teams last season who swept the Chiefs.

There's really no reason for a team to be overly excited about the team's prospects in the next two seasons when you factor in the age of the team's stars and the moves that haven't been made to get ready for their departure.
__________________
Chiefs 2016 Opponents:
Home: JAX, TEN, NO, TB, NYJ. Away: HOU, IND, ATL, CAR, PIT
Chiefs 2017 Opponents:
Home: BUF, MIA, PHI, WSH, AFC North. Away: NE, NYJ, NYG, DAL, AFC South
Posts: 45,272
Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote