Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow
Wow Pest, if you can do that kind of rape job to the 9ers for our 23rd pick, I vote you new assistant GM in charge of trades....
The realistic trade value for #23 if dropping down to #30 is that we'll also receive #94 (R3) and #170 (R5). That is a far cry from two 2nd round picks.
Edit: As a reference.... Last year the trade from 22 to 30 netted #92 and #198.
|
Actually, I think maybe I was smoking crack. For some reason I was thinking about trading down into the 2nd and what would be required to compensate for that drop. Since the 9ers had two second round picks, I threw both of those in without realizing that I had already accounted for a trade down to the bottom of the first, not the top of the second.
I guess if you want to look at this idea with a more realistic lens, then just ignore either the Cody Latimer pick.
Wow, that was a ****up on my part.