Quote:
Originally Posted by Cunning Linguist
No. We have a scientific method that fuels the evidence-based medicine doctors practice daily. You can toss around terms like subclinical hypothyroidism and fill in massive logical gaps with lofty promises, but when there is absolutely no data and evidence to support your bullshit, people will call you a quack.
Sorry, but you're a ****ing quack.
|
Dude, you are coming off as a prick if you deem to dismiss any and all pathologies simply because they have yet to gain established practicum. Observational data, often comes out as a secondary finding many times in research and investigative protocols. Hell, new findings pop up about the health related effects of substances we've been ingesting for years that were previously unknown. Of course, there is a lot of snakeoil salesman, but caveat emptor to those that don't do their own research and due diligence. It certainly doesn't mean everything is junk science. That's obtuse and dangerously ignorant
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy
I've heard mixed reviews from people that have tried injectable B vitamins. Never checked out the science though since I wasn't planning on trying it myself.
|
My dad is a doctor and we've had a number of conversations about vitamin B and it's benefits. He's head of the largest clinical phase 1 group in America. Clinical phase 1 are 1st time in man drug trials, so he has a decent amount of understanding of physiological responses to compounds in man. He and I are both in agreement on the gains in vitamin B and their benefits. Just FYI.