Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
The Colts are the most one dimensional team in the NFL. They don't even have the whiff of a threat of a running game. That makes things significantly more difficult for Luck. Their defense is also markedly worse than KC's.
Hootie is being duplicitous. For years he said there was no difference between Marvin Harrison and Eddie Kennison. Now, Luck is surrounded by talent because they put up big numbers with him? Which one is it?
Luck's line is worse than KC's (he gets hit more than any QB in football) his running backs are the worst in the NFL (KC has arguably the best), his primary TE is worse.
The only thing he has better than Smith are his receivers. His defense isn't in the same galaxy as KC's.
If you put 2014 Andrew Luck on this Chiefs team it's 14-2. If you put 2014 Alex Smith on the Colts they're 5-11.
|
omfg
this is ridiculous
Luck has a worse line than KC?
Dwayne Allen and Coby Fleener are really worse than Fasano and Kelce?
Ahmad Bradshaw was really that bad?
Shit, I'll give you Charles >>>>>> than anything Indy had. Bradshaw and Knile Davis were about a wash.
The receivers? Donte Moncrief probably would have made our team exponentially better, but that's on Dorsey. And I won't even mention T.Y. Hilton.
But I'm tired of guys like Luck getting excuses.
Why?
Why does he get an excuse because his offense sucked?
Peyton threw 55 TD's with an undrafted LT last year taking over for Clady. He was sacked his usual less than 20 times and took his usual almost not hits.
Luck takes too many hits because he holds the ball too long. So does Smith. So does Rodgers.
When people start realizing QB's who take sacks are ruining offensive drives where you only get about 10 per game ... they'll start to realize how valuable Peyton Manning really is ... a guy who never puts his team in a 3rd and unmanageable.
I'm so, so, so tired of Andrew Luck, who turns the ball over 20 times per year on average, getting pass after pass after pass because he was an elite prospect.
He doesn't do more with less than Manning or Brady. He's just not NEARLY as good as they are.
Peyton Manning would have still won more games with that Indy team than Andrew Luck.
Wanna know why?
BECAUSE HE'S BETTER THAN LUCK.
Peyton would have won between 11 and 14 games on all 32 NFL teams this year.
Andrew Luck regressed this year. That's not a great sign. He was supposed to be the next HOF once in a generation QB. He hasn't lived up to the hype. Right now, he's simply the next Eli Manning with mobility.
Stop making excuses for these guys. It's ridiculous.