Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNull
|
"Morrison’s claim that the
Joker kills Batman at the end of the story is clearly only one way of reading an intentionally vague scene. Obviously, DC would never
let them actually kill Batman in the story, but the fact that the ending could be interpreted that way enriches the twenty-five-year-old comic. "
They have this COMPLETELY backwards. I didn't read the rest of the article but clearly this guy has no idea what the **** he's on about