Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicHef
Why is a conservative political thinktank doing research on footballs?
Anyway, remember how I was talking a few weeks ago about how you have to assume an extremely specific timeline (invented out of thin air by a Patriots fan) of what happened during the halftime measurements to come to this conclusion? These guys don't just assume it, they state it as fact in their report with no evidence.
Also, to reach their conclusion, they're assuming that a football is a rigid vessel. I don't think it is, do you?
|
Do you mean measuring the Colts footballs last? No evidence? They said they ran out of time when doing the Colts footballs. What does that suggest? That they did the Pats balls first, and THEN the Colts balls. Heck, "suggest" is too weak a word. What other possible conclusion could there be.
And bottom line is the Wells report should have included the timeline, and should have factored it in, or ELIMINATED IT, but they didn't.