Quote:
Originally Posted by TEX
Nobody even suggested that until he did...We were all just saying we would like the line to be solid / decent / good enough. It's not. Its still bottom 1/3 in the league by today's standards. Its bad enough as is to wreck the season. Can it improve to be just "good enough?" Probably so, but what happens during that process? The season can quickly get ugly and be lost. Week 1 is a must win. The Chiefs can recover from 1-2 but not from 0-3 or 0-4, and then Pitt comes calling week 5... In other words the Chiefs cant afford to wait on the OL to get it together...
|
Again, your definition of "solid" means something closer to that 2003 line than it does an average NFL offensive line. Your expectations are ridiculous.
We HAD a good group until we had lots of injuries. Right now your expectation is that the offensive line with ****ing Paul Fanaika at RT should have looked good against a top 5 DL in the NFL. The fact that it didn't means it's not "solid" or adequate.
It's not just unreasonable. It's ****ing stupid is what it is.