Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
Looking at team game single positions 'in a vacuum' is what's bullshit, especially when you assume synergy for some positions and discount it entirely for others.
Truly, I realize that a lot of people see me as an Alex apologist. I'm not. I'm just trying to get people to apply their butthurt evenly.
****, we're a 1/2 step away from blaming moldy hot dogs in the concession stands over vendor despondence over QB performance.
I understand, QB is THE MOST IMPORTANT POSITION IN CIVILIZATION!!!WTFBBQ!!SMURFANAL!!!
It's still a team game.
|
You're right, and the D did their job in MN; kept AP in check and only allowed MN to score 16 points. It wasn't a stellar performance but it was a solid performance on the road in the NFL.
The O, led by Smith, failed to capitalize on the D's effort. So one part of the team did their job and the other did not. Put an average QB in place of Smith KC wins a close one. But with Smith we get the same old same old, a milquetoast effort from a QB that more afraid of losing the game than taking the bull by the horns and winning the game.
Smith is so scared of making a mistake that his play lacks any type of fire. When the leader of the O is scared the rest of the unit reflects that. The opposing D sees this and adjusts. This is why we find ourselves where were are now as KC fans. Pieces of what could be a good to great team held back by the lack of a quality QB. Same old, same old.