Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochise
The title is completely false. Clark didn't say that or anything like that. He made some throwaway statement that he thought the London games were a good idea and he's glad they participated.
In fact, the Teicher piece specifically says they are NOT likely to play a home game there again anytime soon.
But for some reason there are a few yokels who are unhinged that the Chiefs might suck their way through 7 dates at Arrowhead instead of 8 every couple of years. Why, who can guess? But some people are ready to launch a rebellion over the team playing 1 London game in what, 4-5 years of the international series.
|
Amen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88
I think the point is why does Clark have to be so eager to do something that puts the Chiefs at a competitive disadvantage... i.e. give up a home game at Arrowhead?
|
What, you think they woulda curbstomped the Detoilet Lions 55-3 inside Arrowhead??
Maybe. But how much of an edge do you need to obliterate the Lions??
If anything, it seemingly made the team sharper, knowing that they didn't have that Arrowhead energy to draw from...