Quote:
Originally Posted by TEX
I'm not too sure about that. CB opposite Peters concerns me. Many questions there. CB's are very important in this scheme. Will wait and see how it all plays out. Gains may be fine and Russell might be something. Just have some concerns at this point in time.
|
I'd preferred to have gone CB and then G but since there are still a ton of G's out there with G/T ability I'd be a sucker.
Considering what's left there's huge talent at G, OLB, and HB.
I know we don't need OLB or HB but it's there...