[GloryDayz]

I'm on Kelce's side, it's very superficial and shallow to say all the things the commentators said, and the league will say. But in the end if the Chiefs have any balls at all, they won't talk to the league about what Kelce did unless the league is willing to replay what all the official's missed on the play in question. It's relevant, and it matters; it's not OK for them to miss that. And if the league does something overly stupid, the Chiefs should bonus Kelse some dramatic amount in the future to let the league know they suck hairy goat balls.

Now, if they suspect Kelce for a game for hurting an official's feelings and the officials for two games for missing something that was obvious (dereliction of duty), I'll be fine with it.