Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz
So the player gets everything no matter what?
Chiefs shouldn't have extended Charles a few year ago either.
Patriots wouldn't have
|
No, I'm actually looking at it from the franchise's standpoint. You reward the players
who really deserve it in order to help yourselves with contracts and signings in the future.
Charles' extension was basically just moving around numbers on a pre-existing contract. That's not really related to this situation in any way. This is more like his 2010 contract.