Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow
1. Is he capable of avoiding or warding off impending contact of an opponent? No, he got absolutely raped on this play and it should have been pass interference on #28.
2. Is he capable of tucking the ball away? No, again because #28 was busy raping him and then momentum kept him from bringing his arms into a tuck position.
3. Is he capable of turning up field? No, again because #28 is now at his feet impeding his progress and tripping him up.
4. Is he capable of taking additional steps? Not while keeping his arms attached to both himself and the football.
.
|
aslo, those are an "or" situation, correct? so just fulflling any of the conditions would satisfy the argument. seemingly